1. Home
  2. / Economy
  3. / 6×1 Scale: Debate intensifies in Brazil with divergent opinions on the work model
reading time 5 min read Comments 1 comments

6×1 Scale: Debate intensifies in Brazil with divergent opinions on the work model

Written by Rafaela Fabris
Published 12/11/2024 às 07:52
6x1 Scale: Debate intensifies in Brazil with divergent opinions on the work model
Deputies Nikolas Ferreira and Reginaldo Lopes disagree on the 6×1 scale (Image: Reproduction)

The recent proposal to review the working day, known as the 6x1 scale, has generated great repercussions and mobilized diverse opinions in Brazil. Deputies Nikolas Ferreira and Reginaldo Lopes expressed their positions in relation to the model.

For many CLT workers, the 6×1 scale is a central point in the organization of the working day, impacting the routine and living conditions of thousands of Brazilians.

The proposal under discussion aims to change the 6×1 model to other work configurations, such as the 4×3 scale, where people would work four days in a row with three days off.

Ferreira points out that an in-depth debate is necessary before any change, highlighting that simplifications can hide consequences serious economic consequences. “The idea of ​​implementing new scales without assessing the impact on the economy could bring problems that, in the future, will fall on the CLT workers themselves,” emphasized the deputy.

The complexity of the 6×1 scale

The issue of the 6×1 scale raises debates about productivity, quality of life and even the cultural impact of this change in Brazil.

According to the PL deputy, the current model is not perfect, but he questions the potential impact of a drastic change to a 4×3 journey, especially in sectors that require continuous operations, such as hospitals, supermarkets and restaurants.

Ferreira also argues that an increase in rest days would force companies to hire more workers or reduce weekly working hours, which would result in a higher cost that, according to him, could be passed on to the end consumer.

“If the change to a 4×3 system is not well thought out, it could result in increased unemployment or informal employment among CLT workers. Companies with high operating costs, especially those that operate 24 hours a day, may have to choose between laying off employees or increasing prices to absorb the new costs,” he noted.

PT deputy defends the project

Federal deputy Reginaldo Lopes (PT-MG), deputy leader of the government in the Chamber, expressed his support for the end of the 6×1 model, which provides for one day off for every six days worked.

The proposal, which aims to implement a work schedule of four days of work for three days of rest (4×3) or five days of work for two days of rest (5×2) without a salary reduction, is one of Lopes' flagship projects, and his Proposed Amendment to the Constitution (PEC) is still awaiting filing in the Chamber of Deputies.

Lopes argues that adapting working hours without impacting wages is a necessary step to provide workers with a better quality of life, allowing more time with family and opportunities for qualification.

He highlights that the current work model in Brazil is outdated, as it was implemented before major technological transformations, such as the advent of the internet and the automation of processes.

Lopes emphasizes that these changes significantly increased the productivity of companies and that the results of this gain must be shared with workers.

Brazilian productivity challenge

Nikolas Ferreira also mentioned the difficulties faced by CLT workers due to traffic and public infrastructure, which, according to him, impacts productivity.

He highlights that long working hours and commuting time are relevant issues for any debate on the work schedule in Brazil. He stressed that many workers end up wasting hours on public transport and face exhausting working conditions.

It further emphasizes that comparing the Brazilian scenario with other countries, these aspects need to be taken into account, and that simply changing working hours may not be enough to improve the quality of life of CLT workers.

Economic consequences?

The deputy highlighted that changes in the work schedule, such as the change from the 6×1 scale to the 4×3 model, can increase costs for companies and generate inflation, as the additional expenses are often passed on to the consumer.

He warns about “populist measures” and explains that significant change without responsibility can lead to economic problems and, possibly, a worsening of workers’ lives.

For Ferreira, there is a fine line between protecting labor rights and increasing the financial burden on employers. He emphasizes that, without careful analysis, the cost of change may be higher than expected, not only for employers, but also for workers themselves.

Need for a discussion?

The speeches by the deputies highlight the need for a more in-depth debate on the 6x1 scale. Ferreira argues that the topic should be widely discussed and analyzed, seeking alternatives that can balance the interests of CLT workers and companies.

Congressman Reginaldo Lopes, in turn, defends the adaptation of the workday to models such as 4×3 or 5×2, arguing that these options would provide a better quality of life for CLT workers, allowing them more time with their family and opportunities for personal and professional development.

Lopes highlights that, with the advancement of technology and the increase in productivity in companies, it is fair that workers also reap the benefits of these gains, participating in a work model that aligns with current changes in the market and living conditions.

Amid increasing pressure for changes in working conditions, the 6x1 scale remains at the center of discussions, with different positions.

For CLT workers, this is an issue that directly affects their routine and quality of life. On the other hand, business owners and legislators are analyzing the financial impacts that the change may have.

With discussion still ongoing, it is clear that the issue requires a balance between rights and economic viability, with the hope that the result will bring real improvements for the working class without compromising economic development.

And you, do you agree with any of the representatives? Express your opinion in the comments, after all, the project concerns more than 30 million formal workers in Brazil.

Be the first to react!
React to article
Register
Notify
guest
1 Comment
Older
Last Most voted
Feedbacks
View all comments
Lucas Tubino Law Firm
Lucas Tubino Law Firm
19/11/2024 10:14

The role of the Labor Lawyer is extremely important in the fight for workers' rights! Let's work together to achieve decent working conditions for everyone!

Rafaela Fabris

It discusses innovation, renewable energy, oil and gas. With over 1.200 articles published in CPG, it provides daily updates on opportunities in the Brazilian job market.

Share across apps
0
We would love your opinion on this subject, comment!x