1. Home
  2. / Legislation and Law
  3. / A man who discovered he was not the biological father is still obliged to pay child support due to socio-affective paternity, a court in Goiás rules.
reading time 3 min read Comments 10 comments

A man who discovered he was not the biological father is still obliged to pay child support due to socio-affective paternity, a court in Goiás rules.

Published 12/10/2025 às 09:48
The Goiás Court upheld child support payments to a man who discovered he was not the biological father, recognizing socio-affective paternity based on the emotional bond with the child and reinforcing the legal value of this bond in Brazil.
The Goiás Court upheld child support payments to a man who discovered he was not the biological father, recognizing socio-affective paternity based on the emotional bond with the child and reinforcing the legal value of this bond in Brazil.
  • Reaction
  • Reaction
  • Reaction
  • Reaction
  • Reaction
  • Reaction
249 people reacted to this.
React to article

The Court ruled that, even without a genetic link, the man must continue paying child support for having established socio-affective paternity with the child, a decision based on the principle of the best interests of the child.

The Court of Goiás decided that a man who discovered he was not the biological father of a girl must continue paying child support. The case was judged by the 1st Family and Succession Court of Aparecida de Goiânia, which rejected the request for annulment of the civil registration and exemption from payment of the pension.

According to the sentence, the socio-affective bond between a man and a child has legal value equivalent to biological paternity. According to the portal people's gazette, even after the DNA test proved that there was no genetic link, the evidence of process showed that he maintained a continuous relationship of affection and responsibility with the girl, which configured the so-called socio-affective paternity, consolidating the duty of support.

The concept of socio-affective paternity is recognized by Brazilian legislation and higher courts.

It establishes that whoever raises, educates and establishes an emotional bond with the child assumes legal obligations similar to those of a biological parent.

The basis is in the constitutional principle of human dignity and in best interests of the minor, which prevails over the genetic link.

In the case of Goiás, the man registered the child believing he was the biological father.

Even after discovering otherwise through a DNA test, he continued to play an active role in the girl's life for several years.

The Court understood that breaking this emotional and financial bond would cause emotional harm to the child., who recognized him as a father figure.

Decision reinforces STJ jurisprudence

The understanding of the 1st Family Court follows the guidance of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), which has consolidated the legal validity of socio-affective paternity for years.

The court has ruled that affection, coexistence and the intention of being a father generate legal effects as relevant as blood.

In previous judgments, the STJ highlighted that fatherhood is not only biological, but also built on daily life, and that, once consolidated, cannot be undone by mere genetic testing.

This interpretation aims to protect the child's emotional bond and ensure the stability of their family structure.

Civil liability and duty of support

By maintaining the civil registry, the man remains legally responsible for the payment of alimony, as well as other obligations arising from membership.

The value should continue to be calculated based on the the child's needs and the economic capacity of the person providing support, as provided for in the Civil Code and the Statute of Children and Adolescents (ECA).

We also pack any the exclusion of the father's name from the civil registry can only occur in exceptional situations, when the lack of an emotional bond and the total breakdown of the family relationship are proven.

In the case in question, the Court observed that the behavior of the man who maintained contact and participated in the upbringing of the girl showed otherwise.

Social and legal impact of the decision

Cases like this reinforce the importance of recognizing socio-affective paternity as an instrument for protecting children.

The Goiás decision reaffirms that affiliation is, above all, an act of responsibility and emotional bond., not just a genetic test result.

The tendency of Brazilian courts is to expand the reconhecimento of this type of parenting, guaranteeing children equal rights to biological children, including with regard to pension, inheritance and civil name.

Do you agree with this ruling by the Goiás court? Do you think it's fair that emotional ties take precedence over biological ones in pension cases? Tell us your thoughts in the comments—we'd love to hear from anyone who's experienced something similar.

A square banner on a black gradient background highlights the phrase "Access CPG Click Petróleo e Gás with fewer ads" in white and red letters. Below, informative text: "Lightweight app, personalized news, reviews, resumes, and more." In the footer, Google Play and App Store icons indicate the app's availability.
Registration
Notify
guest
10 Comments
Last
Older Most voted
Feedbacks
View all comments
sidinei walacheski
sidinei walacheski(@ienidis3)
Active Member
13/10/2025 12:56

If there were true justice, this woman and her biological father should reimburse the amount spent by the deceived person and also pay moral damages.
But since everything is a circus and carnival, the guy ends up being punished twice.
This will end relationships, men will no longer trust women and vice versa.

Elizwte
Elizwte
13/10/2025 08:16

Yes, I agree with the court's decision.
But I understand the person's situation; they were deceived, ridiculed... but the emotional bond created does not break in a hearing.
For me it is a superhuman act, of overcoming for the benefit of a greater purpose.

Debora
Debora
In reply to  Elizwte
13/10/2025 14:57

What "greater good"? Supporting the offspring of betrayal? Such a decision is absurd. This farce of compulsory socio-affectivity should end. The mother must struggle with her child's psychological well-being.

Ana Paula Girardon Ferreira
Ana Paula Girardon Ferreira(@anagirardon_apgf)
Active Member
12/10/2025 21:43

It's absurd, the guy was deceived and on top of that he has to pay child support for a child that isn't his????? What do you mean? Is it the biological father or the mother who is responsible for this role????

If the man doesn't want to take responsibility for the child, it's a crime to exploit the creature 🤡🤡🤡🤡

Philver Viana
Philver Viana
In reply to  Ana Paula Girardon Ferreira
13/10/2025 13:33

Dude, the guy found out he wasn't the father and kept the kid, he really needs to get screwed, you read the whole news, from the moment he found out he should have gotten out... He messed up

Jon
Jon
In reply to  Philver Viana
13/10/2025 21:08

Go after the biological father

Optimus Prime
Optimus Prime
In reply to  Ana Paula Girardon Ferreira
13/10/2025 14:21

I understand that the love he acquired for this child and she for him are irrevocable, but forcing him to pay full child support is ridiculous. He should at least call the biological father into the process and share the child's obligations with the emotional father.
It is our legal system, immoral, but legal.

Jon
Jon
In reply to  Optimus Prime
13/10/2025 21:12

If he is not a father, he has no obligation to the child, he has already done a lot, for the time he was deceived, I think he should receive with interest and correction the amounts spent.

Ana
Ana
In reply to  Ana Paula Girardon Ferreira
13/10/2025 17:21

The information is that even afterward, he continued to maintain contact with the child. Only later, for reasons that were not mentioned, did he decide to remove his name from the birth certificate and stop assuming paternity. Therefore, I agree with the court's outcome; he was aware of the situation.

Jon
Jon
In reply to  Ana
13/10/2025 21:15

I wanted to see if you were the man, having to pay child support for a child that isn't yours.

Maria Heloisa Barbosa Borges

I talk about construction, mining, Brazilian mines, oil and major railway and civil engineering projects. I write daily about interesting facts about the Brazilian market.

Share across apps
0
We would love your opinion on this subject, comment!x
()
x