English 
Spanish 
5 min read
0 comments
Businessman shocks the world by suggesting that unemployment should rise by 50% to “put workers in their rightful place”.
A surprising statement has shaken up the corporate world. In a scenario marked by economic crises and debates about valorization of work, an unexpected statement by a real estate magnate caused widespread outrage, both on social media and among economists.
His words brought up a sensitive issue: the balance of power between employers and workers, at a time of growing dissatisfaction in the global labor market.
What led this businessman to suggest something so radical? Let's dive into the details of this story that caused such a stir.
- Gol and Azul surprise the market and prepare a historic merger: Will this be the end of airline competition in Brazil? Discover the impacts of this unexpected union!
- Central Bank announces new PIX rules and surprises users. Understand what will change from November 2024
- Many believe that debts with Serasa expire after 5 years, but understand what really happens and unravel this important financial myth
- The end of Claro, Oi, Tim and others? Nubank prepares to launch its own mobile operator
Businessman Tim Gurner's controversial speech
During the event AFR Property Summit In 2023, Tim Gurner, founder and CEO of Gurner Group, gave a speech that shocked the audience and echoed around the world.
According to Gurner, “employees feel that the company is very lucky to have them, not the other way around.” He added: “We have to end this attitude, and it has to happen at a loss in the economy.”
The businessman was even more emphatic, stating that “unemployment needs to grow by 40% or 50%” so that workers “remember that they work for companies, and not the other way around”.
These words brought to the fore a complex debate about the power relationship between employers and employees.
Changes in employment relationships
Gurner’s comment did not come in a vacuum. In recent years, the global labor market has undergone profound changes.
Terms like quiet quitting (the practice of doing only the minimum necessary at work) and quiet ambition (discreet ambition, where employees avoid drawing attention) have gained prominence.
In response, companies have developed strategies such as quiet cutting, in which they create work environments that force employees to resign voluntarily.
As these dynamics evolve, the pressure on employers and employees has intensified. However, Gurner has taken a more extreme view: advocating higher unemployment as a way to rebalance the balance of power.
Public reaction and Gurner's apology
Reactions to Gurner's speech were swift and intense. On social media, netizens expressed their outrage at the businessman's harsh words, who was accused of being insensitive to the plight of millions of workers who face uncertainty and difficulties in their careers.
The backlash was so strong that Gurner quickly issued an apology.
In his words: “I want to be clear: I appreciate that when someone loses their job, it has a profound impact on them and their families, and I sincerely regret that my words did not convey empathy for those in this situation.”
He went on to say that his comments about unemployment and productivity were wrong and that he deeply regretted the impact his words had caused.
Economic context in Australia
The context for Gurner's statement is the backdrop of high inflation and price pressures in the housing and rental markets in Australia.
According to him, “there are clearly important conversations to be had in this environment of high inflation, price pressures on housing and rents due to lack of supply and other cost of living issues.”
The economic crisis and difficulties in the job market have led many economists to discuss alternatives to deal with these challenges.
However, the solution presented by Gurner was considered extreme and, according to experts, not very effective in solving the structural problems of the Australian economy.
Impact of speech on the real estate sector
Tim Gurner is a prominent figure in Australia's luxury real estate market. His company, Gurner Group, is responsible for multi-million dollar developments catering to the country's elite.
In light of this, his words caused even more discomfort, as he seemed to suggest a measure that would directly affect the working population, while the luxury sector remains protected from the greatest economic consequences.
According to Australian economist David Murphy, “talking about unemployment as a control tool for companies is an outdated and ineffective approach.” He points out that such measures do not solve the fundamental problems of the cost of living and, in fact, can worsen the social crisis.
Genuine apology or marketing strategy?
The sincerity of Gurner's apology has been widely questioned, with many netizens believing he was simply trying to mitigate the negative impact of his words in order to preserve his image and the reputation of his company.
According to online reactions, Gurner has revealed his true opinion about the role of workers in today's economy, and the apology is just a strategy to minimize the damage caused by the negative repercussions.
Reflexes in Brazil
Although the Australian scenario is different from the Brazilian one, Gurner's words can also resonate in Brazil, where unemployment and inflation are recurring problems.
The situation of the relationship between employers and employees in the country also has its challenges, with many companies facing difficulties in maintaining their operations in an unstable economic environment.
The idea of increasing unemployment as a solution, however, would certainly not find support in Brazil, where unemployment rates are already a significant social concern.
Would Brazil also face a wave of unemployment if businesspeople adopted drastic measures like those suggested by Tim Gurner?
