Chinese (Simplified) 
Chinese (Traditional) 
English 
French 
Alemão 
Italian 
Japanese 
Norwegian 
Spanish 
4 min read
11 comments
A million-dollar banking mistake and an unexpected reaction
Imagine opening your bank app and discovering a balance of R $ million 78. That's exactly what happened to a client from São Paulo, who for a few days experienced what many would call "great luck." But what seemed like a miracle soon turned into a curious legal case, widely reported on portals such as BR104 e G1: he invested the money, made a profit of almost R$1 million — and then returned it all.
According to information released by the man's defense, the deposit was made by mistake in August, following an error processing internal transfers at the financial institution. The client noticed the high amount but believed it was a temporary transaction and decided to invest the amount in a short-term fixed-income transaction.
Profit of R$977 thousand and full refund
For a few days, the investment paid off R$ 977 thousand in interest and monetary correctionAs soon as the bank identified the error, it notified the customer and demanded a full refund. The man, according to his lawyer, did not hesitate to return the full amount. R $ million 78, including the income obtained.
The case surprised social media: while many internet users highlighted the honesty, others questioned the institution's behavior, which had allegedly committed a serious error in financial control.
-
Income tax exemption in 2026 will boost the 13th-month salary and increase the income of Brazilians.
-
Amazon joins forces with Nubank to dethrone rivals in e-commerce and threatens the dominance of Mercado Libre and Shopee with exclusive credit via NuPay.
-
Central Bank keeps Selic rate at 15% and leaves door open for another interest rate hike.
-
INSS (Brazilian National Social Security Institute) gives retirees until November 20th to complete biometric registration to avoid the suspension of retirement, pension, and BPC (Continuous Benefit Payment) payments.
Civil law experts explain that, even if it's a bank error, the law is clear: amounts received improperly must be returned, regardless of the profit generated. However, returning the proceeds demonstrates good faith and avoids legal complications, such as accusations of illicit enrichment or misappropriation.
What does Brazilian law say about cases like this?
According to article 876 of the Civil Code, “anyone who has received what was not due to him is obliged to return it”.
In other words, even if the deposit was made by mistake, the recipient cannot spend, invest, or hide the money. If they do, they may be held liable in court.
In cases like this, the Public Prosecutor's Office usually monitors the proceedings to ensure there is no bad faith. Case law is also clear: those who act in good faith, return the funds, and cooperate with the investigation generally avoid penalties.
"What stands out in this case is the client's ethical behavior. He could have gotten into legal trouble, but he chose to act correctly," the lawyer said. Roger Almeida, specialist in banking law, in an interview with the portal BR104.
Million-dollar banking mistakes are more common than you think.
Although it may seem unlikely, errors of this kind happen with surprising frequency.
In 2019, a merchant from Goiás received R $ million 63,9 by mistake and immediately returned the amount, becoming an example of honesty. In 2021, a US bank accidentally transferred $900M monthly to various funds — and had to go to court to recover part of the amount.
These incidents expose the vulnerability of financial systems, which depend on constant integration between digital platforms, automation, and human analysis. Small code flaws or incorrect data cross-referencing can result in billions in losses.
Honesty in digital times
Amid the crisis of confidence affecting banks and financial institutions, stories like this reignite the debate about ethics, responsibility and limits of technology.
The São Paulo client could have hidden the money, invested it in tax havens, or claimed ignorance. But he chose to return every cent—and still forfeit the profits.
For many Brazilians, this attitude symbolizes something rare: honesty above temptation.
Messages of support for the man poured in on social media. "He had something many people don't have: character," wrote one user. Another commented: "If it were me, I wouldn't even sleep well because I was nervous."
Final reflection: a mistake that became a lesson
The case of the deposit of R $ million 78 serves as an example for citizens and banks.
For clients, it reinforces the importance of transparency and prudence when dealing with unusual situations.
For financial institutions, it is a reminder that Technical errors can be costly — and public trust is your most valuable asset.
In the end, the episode ended well: the money was returned, the bank corrected the error, and the customer walked away with something that no investment can buy — reputation.
He would be entitled to a share after all the error was the bank's. I made a wrong Pix of two hundred reais. I contacted the bank and the **** who received the money. I was at a loss. Where is the bank's honesty at that time to investigate the case? Now they cannot be at a loss because nothing was transformed into cryptocurrency and left the country. You will see the headache when the day comes for him to pay income tax, for example, when this movement appears. Will the bank bear the costs of the accountant to explain? LOL
It wasn't the bank that made the mistake. It was you. The bank can't refund the amount. The one who has to return or authorize the return is the one who received it. If you don't, you can seek legal restitution and compensation from the person who RECEIVED it.
What if, for some reason, the application of this negative result? What would happen? Please answer us, Dr. Lawyer.
If it is a CDB with daily liquidity, there is no such thing as a negative, you will only receive less because of inflation or only if the bank goes bankrupt (which is not the case).
I would return the amount, not the profit, since the profit would not generate any loss for the bank, but rather the amount deposited incorrectly.
You're in front of a Beetle, someone walks by and says, "Look, I'll give you 100 for this car." You accept, wait for the owner to come back, then you say, "Look, I sold your Beetle, here's 20, it's more than it was worth."
Do you really think the owner of the Beetle isn't taking a loss, with you getting 80 thousand? The money belonged to the bank and consequently any profit coming from it also belongs to you.
Very different in this case 😄
That's a very bad comparison. The bank didn't lose the money.
In fact, in this case, it would be as if the buyer took the Beetle without paying, sold it for twice the price, and paid the seller the amount he was selling it for, thus making a profit on the value of the Beetle and paying the seller normally.