English 
Spanish 
3 min read
0 comments
Backpack turns into a nightmare for an employee, who is fired for cause after hanging it in a trash can. The court decision reveals how small actions can have big consequences in the workplace.
A simple backpack, gifted by company during the holiday season, it turned into a real nightmare for an employee.
What seemed like an innocent gesture became the center of a controversy that culminated in his dismissal for just cause.
But how far can an employee's dissatisfaction go? The outcome of this story, confirmed by the courts, brings to light issues that go beyond the simple employment relationship and reveal how small actions can have serious consequences.
- Japan to cut working hours so workers can focus on having children
- The end of notary offices? Revolutionary technology promises to transform this essential service forever and challenge centuries of bureaucracy in Brazil!
- Digging all the way to China: would it be impossible to overcome more than 12.700 km of land?
- Teenager creates 3 cryptocurrencies in a single night, earns more than 300 thousand reais in a few hours and puts the memecoin market in shock!
Dismissal confirmed by the Court
The 17th Panel of the Regional Labor Court of the 2nd Region of São Paulo decided to uphold the dismissal for just cause of an employee who hung a backpack, a Christmas gift from the company, over a trash can at his workplace.
The Court's understanding took into account the employee's history of disciplinary warnings and considered the act as a direct offense to the company's honor.
Case Context
According to information from the case, the worker acknowledged that he hung the backpack in the trash can as a sign of dissatisfaction with the gift he received.
The act, which was recorded on video, was confirmed by a witness who was present at the scene.
In his defense, the employee argued that the dismissal was unfair, since he had never been formally warned.
However, the company presented evidence that contradicted this claim, demonstrating that the worker had already received notifications for unjustified absences and delays.
Furthermore, there were records of a previous incident in which the employee attempted to access a restricted area, which was also filmed and documented.
Analysis of employee conduct
The company made it clear that the problem did not lie in the disposal of the backpack, but rather in the act of disrespectfully displaying it on top of the trash can.
This attitude was interpreted as a public manifestation of discontent, something that violates the principles of respect and good coexistence in the corporate environment.
According to witness statements, the employee used to criticize the company openly, including negative comments in WhatsApp groups, which worsened his situation.
Furthermore, he had expressed an intention to force entry into restricted areas whenever he wished, revealing defiant behavior.
Court Decision
Judge Débora Cristina Rios Fittipaldi Federighi was responsible for reporting the case and concluded that the evidence presented by the employer was sufficient to prove the worker's disrespect.
The Court reinforced that the employee's behavior violated the principles of good faith, which are essential to any employment relationship.
This decision not only confirms the employee's dismissal, but also serves as a warning to other workers.
Disrespect towards the company, even if expressed in a subtle way, can lead to severe consequences.
Reflection on the employer-employee relationship
The case highlights the importance of mutual respect in working relationships.
A simple action can have profound repercussions, and the way an employee behaves towards their company can directly influence their job stability.
Termination for cause is not a measure that should be taken lightly, but when evidence of disrespect and misconduct is clear, companies have the right to protect their image and principles.
Do you think the punishment applied in this case was fair or disproportionate? What would your reaction be if you were in the same situation?
