Chinese (Simplified) 
Chinese (Traditional) 
English 
French 
Alemão 
Italian 
Japanese 
Norwegian 
Spanish 
4 min read
0 comments
In cases of joint accounts, a judge can release funds by court order in a simple procedure, but there are practical limits, the need for a lawyer, and the risk of misappropriation when there are other heirs or there is no agreement on the division.
When an owner dies and there is joint account, the question immediately arises: is it possible to move money without inventory? In specific situations, withdrawal may be authorized by court order., a faster and less costly solution than traditional inventory, especially when the assets to be shared are limited to account amounts or labor and social security balances.
The simplified route, however, it is not a free pass to withdraw the entire balance. There are limits, formal requirements and relevant legal risks. Withdrawing on your own may constitute misappropriation when there are other heirs or conflict about sharingThe rule of thumb is simple: the more consensus and documentation, the greater the chance of safe release.
What can be done without inventory?
When the deceased leaves only money in the bank, it is common to ask court order to release the withdrawal.
-
Specialist lawyers and courts confirm: an heir who maintains the property, pays electricity and water bills, and invests in renovations can acquire ownership of a property through adverse possession against relatives who never cared for it, according to the new update to the Civil Code.
-
The government has announced that those who care for elderly people at home will now receive R$ 759 per month for up to 24 months per beneficiary, starting in 6 cities in Paraná.
-
INSS (Brazilian National Social Security Institute) should extend the deadline to contest improper deductions from retirement and pension benefits.
-
Senior citizen parking permits change in Rio and are now valid forever: see what's changed and how to request the new document.
The warrant is an order from the judge addressed to the financial institution to allow the movement of funds, without opening the complete inventory, which reduces deadlines and costs.
This alternative fits into hypotheses of voluntary jurisdiction, in which there is no dispute.
If there is a fight between heirs, the path changes and tends to be the inventory or inventory, with more steps and expenses.
The absence of conflict and the proof that there is only cash increase the predictability of the permit.
Joint account is not all or nothing
Em joint account, as a rule, it is assumed that 50% of the balance belongs to each holder.
With the death of one of them, the surviving co-owner may retain his halfbut cannot freely dispose of the other half, which is part of the inheritance and depends on a warrant or inventory to be released.
Withdrawing 100% after death, with a password, does not legitimize the withdrawal of the deceased's share. In addition to exposing the co-owner to civil disputes, may result in criminal charges when there are other heirs.
Safe practice is separate the presumed share and submit the deceased's share to judicial approval.
Value Limits and the Cap Controversy
In forensic practice, it is common to apply a ceiling for permit based on old parameters, which generates different decisions.
There are judgments that limit the release to modest ranges, while others adopt a broader interpretation when the collection is made up only of money and everyone agrees.
In consensus scenarios, procedural simplification theses quality adequacy to the purpose of the law can enable larger releases, especially when the inventory bureaucracy is disproportionate to liquid and immediately shareable values.
Without consensus, the practical ceiling tends to be more rigid.
How to request a court order, step by step
The order is made on common justice with lawyer.
In general, the court requires: death certificate, heirs' documents, statement or proof of balance, and statement of consent about the division.
When everyone signs and there are no other assets, the analysis is usually faster.
It is recommended clearly indicate the destination of the values: proportional payment to each heir, payment of funeral expenses or family emergencies.
The more objective and documented the request, the greater the predictability of the court order.
When looting becomes misappropriation
if there is other heirs and one of them remove it alone the deceased's share of the joint account, the act can be classified as misappropriation, because the hereditary share, from death, becomes part of the collective of heirs.
There is no “tacit license” to take what belongs to others.
When there is a sole heir, the criminal risk decreases, but the correct procedure continues to be obtaining the permit.
Regularization avoids future questions, including banking and tax professionals. The maxim is simple: do it the right way, with a court order, to sleep peacefully.
Consensus between heirs saves time and money
All heirs must agree with the loot and with the division.
Disagreement makes the case contentious and pushes the solution to inventory, which cost more and take more time.
It is useful to formalize a agreement term, with percentages and target accounts, attaching to the permit application.
Fighting for smaller amounts can be more expensive than compromising. Costs, fees and waiting time consume a relevant part of the balance.
The arithmetic of prudence recommends agreement, especially when the collection is simple and liquid.
Good practices to avoid making mistakes in the first step
Do not move the joint account beyond your presumed half after death.
Gather documents from the beginning and seek legal advice. Avoid duplicate orders in different rods and maintain communication with the bank to block the portion of the estate until the judge's order.
Transparency with other heirs reduces friction.
Present extracts, formalize consents e set payment priorities, such as immediate funeral expenses. Simple planning avoids years of unnecessary discussion.
-
One person reacted to this.