English 
Spanish 
3 min read
7 comments
As cities around the world grow vertically with modern skyscrapers, Europe faces unique challenges in balancing the preservation of its rich historical heritage with the need for urban expansion and modernization, resulting in strict construction policies that limit new tall buildings to protect traditional landscapes and cultural identities.
When we think of big cities, we often imagine skyscrapers that mark the sky, like the ones we see in New York or Dubai. These tall towers are symbols of modernity and growth. However, in Europe, the situation is very different. There, cities are known more for their old and historic buildings than for very tall buildings.
In Europe, skyscrapers are not as common as in other parts of the world. This happens because there is great concern about maintaining the historic characteristics of cities. In places like London and Paris, the laws are very strict regarding the height of buildings so as not to spoil the view of ancient monuments. This decision between preserving the old or building the new is a major challenge for European cities.
The challenge of skyscrapers in Europe
European resistance to the proliferation of skyscrapers is not just an aesthetic preference, but a profound reflection of its cultural and historical values. In Europe, the integration of new construction with the old urban fabric presents significant challenges.
- Komatsu unveils automatic electric underwater tractor that works at depths of 7 meters and plans to dive to 50 meters
- Construction of a colossal bridge that will connect TWO Brazilian states could come to fruition as the project progresses
- Norway makes air raid shelters mandatory in all new buildings to face threats of war and disasters
- Million-dollar construction project unused! The 1.727-meter bridge on BR-153, which cost R$233 million, is ready, but without access, becoming a symbol of public waste in Brazil
Cities like London, for example, rigorously protect more than 50.000 historic buildings, restricting new tall construction that could compromise views and traditional landscapes. These policies, while preserving historic charm, result in a paradoxical housing crisis, where population growth and demand for housing increase but space to construct new buildings is limited.
Development
The history of skyscrapers, which began in Chicago in 1885, contrasts sharply with the European urban trajectory. Already established European cities with historic buildings had little space or need to adopt these gigantic modern structures.
After World War II, the focus in Europe was on the restoration of destroyed heritage, not the vertical innovation typical of the North American model. “Brusselization,” a term derived from Brussels’ poorly planned urban development policies in the 60s, still serves as a warning to European cities today, evoking a caution against development that disregards historical and cultural context.
Current and future repercussions
In the current scenario, even with some exceptions such as the La Défense area in Paris, which is home to most of the city's skyscrapers outside the historic center, Europe continues to face a delicate balance. The need to accommodate a growing population and pressures for commercial and residential space in urban centers often collide with the desire to preserve cultural heritage. This dilemma is not just a question of space but also of identity, challenging European cities to find a sustainable path forward that respects their past while adapting to future needs.
The issue of skyscrapers in Europe is emblematic of broader challenges faced across the continent in the modernization of its cities. Between preserving the old and adapting to the new, Europe walks a tightrope, seeking solutions that honor its history without sacrificing its future. How these issues are resolved will continue to shape European urban identity in the 21st century.
This European mentality is excellent as a support for population reduction, hypertrophy of the state dictating what you can, where you live, and what you need, and finally, invaded by less effeminate and more pragmatic Muslims, Europe itself will be a sterile monument, a record and ode to left-wing ****.
The contagious stupidity of bozolandia is unbelievable! Even in a serious publication without any political context, a bovine appears that prays to the tire and attempts a coup d'état to talk nonsense! Muuuuuu
But you are doing the same!
Where is there support for population reduction in Europe? In most of them there are policies to encourage birth rates, just the opposite of that! It is not because Angela Merkel made a mistake by throwing open the doors to refugees (note: economic migrants) that the whole of Europe should be held to the same standard.
As for the preservation of historic buildings, this is an asset of the European model, although this results in a lack of property supply in large cities and much more expensive rents. However, this is largely compensated by a good passenger transport network.
Even in the few European cities with the highest number of skyscrapers, such as Frankfurt am Main, London or Warsaw, they are generally restricted to the financial center of these cities.
Europe is correct!
I've never been to Europe, but I really admire its ancient architecture. I am fascinated by its well-preserved historic buildings.
When you go, visit Rome, for me the most beautiful and beautiful European city.