English 
Spanish 
3 min read
0 comments
In a world where vehicle robustness is crucial, the crankshafts of the Amarok 2.0 twin-turbo diesel, Hilux 3.0 Turbo and Ram 5.9 or 6.7 face intense comparisons. Automotive sector experts, Júlio Frison and Carlos Faccini, reveal significant differences that directly influence the durability and performance of these popular pickup truck models.
In analysis, comparing the crankshafts of these three vehicles reveals a lot about their capabilities and limitations. The Amarok 2.0, known for its engine powerful and problems of durability after 100.000 km, contrasts with the Hilux 3.0, whose reputation for reliability and failure resistance is remarkable. The Ram, with a similar crankshaft in its 5.9 and 6.7 models, presents a strength challenge but shares certain vulnerabilities with the Amarok.
Júlio Frison, with experience in more than 3.000 engine interventions per month, and Carlos Faccini, a notable figure in Rio's workshops, bring to light the reality faced in grinding. They discuss how crankshaft choice can affect engine longevity and frequency of required maintenance, highlighting that not all crankshafts are created equal.
Crankshaft of the Amarok 2.0 twin-turbo diesel has lower resistance
The crankshaft of the Amarok 2.0 twin-turbo diesel has lower resistance compared to the other two models, which ends up being a point of attention. Commonly, these crankshafts begin to fail after reaching around 100.000 km. This premature wear not only requires frequent maintenance but also involves high costs due to the difficulty of finding replacement parts.
- Collection of abandoned vintage cars on US farm includes Cadillacs and Lincolns, all covered in dust and debris
- China and Stellantis announce mega €4 billion investment in battery factory in Spain
- The Mystery of the Lost Bugatti: A Car Valued at $100 Million That Has Never Been Found
- New Kombi, but from Fiat? The company registers the Fiat Doblò in Brazil and causes anxiety among fans of the utility vehicle! Will it return?
Hilux 3.0 Turbo crankshaft is known for its exceptional robustness
On the other hand, the crankshaft of the Hilux 3.0 Turbo is known for its robustness exceptional. The rarity of problems related to this component contributes significantly to the Hilux's reputation for durability. This results in lower maintenance costs as it rarely needs significant repairs.
Ram crankshaft, available in 5.9 and 6.7 models, offers intermediate durability
Between these two extremes, the Ram crankshaft, available in the 5.9 and 6.7 models, offers intermediate durability. Although it is more resistant than the Amarok, it does not reach the Hilux's standard of resistance. Ram owners can expect maintenance frequency and costs that are between the two other models.
According to Júlio Frison and Carlos Faccini, understanding crankshaft specifications is essential to predict the frequency and cost of future maintenance services. While the Hilux leads with its superior reliability, the Amarok requires a greater investment in maintenance, and the Ram positions itself as a middle-of-the-road option.
When evaluating which truck to buy, looking beyond price and design to key components like the crankshaft can reveal a lot about what to expect in terms of long-term performance. Choosing the model with the most robust component can mean fewer visits to the workshop and significant savings on maintenance.
