Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
6 comments 
In The Midst Of A Labor Shortage, Germany Discovered A Trump Card: The Reduced Workweek Improved Talent Retention And Attraction, Became A Competitive Advantage, And Helped Companies Become More Desirable In Recruitment
In 2024, Germany decided to put one of the most debated ideas in the modern labor market to the test: reducing the workweek to four days without cutting salaries. What began as a controlled experiment with dozens of companies turned into a real study on productivity, well-being, and competitiveness.
Two years later, the data shows that the change not only worked but also structurally altered the work culture of a large part of the organizations involved. For many of them, there was no going back to the traditional model.
The Experiment That Challenged Traditional Logic
The project involved 45 companies from different sectors, including industry, technology, insurance, communication, commerce, and education. The adopted model was the so-called 100-80-100: 100% of the salary, 80% of the hours, and 100% of productivity.
-
Friends have been building a small “town” for 30 years to grow old together, with compact houses, a common area, nature surrounding it, and a collective life project designed for friendship, coexistence, and simplicity.
-
This small town in Germany created its own currency 24 years ago, today it circulates millions per year, is accepted in over 300 stores, and the German government allowed all of this to happen under one condition.
-
Curitiba is shrinking and is expected to lose 97,000 residents by 2050, while inland cities in Paraná such as Sarandi, Araucária, and Toledo are experiencing accelerated growth that is changing the entire state’s map.
-
Tourists were poisoned on Everest in a million-dollar fraud scheme involving helicopters that diverted over $19 million and shocked international authorities.
The proposal seemed bold. Working fewer hours while maintaining the same level of output required a revision of processes, cutting unnecessary meetings, and granting more autonomy to teams. The central idea was not just to reduce days but to eliminate time-wasting.
With the oversight of university researchers and international experts, the data began to reveal something unexpected: productivity did not drop. In some cases, there was even a slight improvement in results.
Companies Did Not Want To Go Back
The most impressive result came in the follow-up after the pilot. About 70% of the companies decided to maintain some form of reduced work hours even after the official end of the test.
Not all of them kept exactly the Monday-to-Thursday workweek. Some adopted hybrid models, reduced annual hours, or created alternate schemes based on demand. The focus shifted from “fixed four days” to “less time, more efficiency.”
For many leaders, the experience showed that productivity is not directly linked to the number of hours worked, but to how work is organized.
Direct Impact On Well-Being And Results
If the financial figures remained stable, the human aspect showed an even more significant impact. The vast majority of workers reported a significant improvement in the balance between personal and professional life.
Employees said they felt less stress and more engagement with the company. Some organizations observed a decrease in absenteeism and increased talent retention.
In a European landscape marked by a shortage of skilled labor, offering reduced hours has come to be seen as a real competitive advantage.
Not Everything Was Roses
Despite the positive results, about 30% of the companies ended up reverting to the traditional model. The main difficulties involved operational challenges, demand spikes, and the need to align with clients who maintained conventional work hours.
Still, the German experiment reinforced a global discussion: working more hours does not necessarily mean producing more. In an increasingly performance- and innovation-oriented world, efficiency may matter more than prolonged presence in the office.
The German experience does not close the debate but expands the question that many countries are already beginning to ask: if it is possible to produce the same in less time, why insist on working more?
A Alemanha tem leis trabalhistas mais flexíveis, permitindo a livre negociação,não é engessada por uma CLT como no Brasil. Além de ser um dos países mais ricos do mundo, muito diferente da realidade brasileira. Apesar de ter impostos altos, são menores que os nossos e entregam pelo menos dez vezes mais benefícios aos seus cidadãos em contra partida. Com um salário mínimo de € 1.200, vc paga no máximo € 5,00 por qualquer medicamento, tem direto a cuidador na sua velhice e a atendimento médico em domicílio.
O empresário reclama sempre, nuca tá satisfeito, mais tem jatinho particular, 2 , 3 casas, é muito mais e o trab assalariado ganha uma miséria, diz um aqui que para o dobro do salário do funcionário para o governo quero que ele me mostre, kkk
Ele paga pouco e reclamam muito o funcionário trab para ó patrão curti a vida, o funcionário trab 6X1 quando não 7 e mal da para se alimentar dignamente, nem dividem o lucro com os trab, só exploram
Eles nuca estão satisfeitos com o governo deprê querem tirar mais do povo brasileiro que é trab
No Brasil não envolve só jornada e produção, a carga tributária, a mão-de-obra barata, o custo de vida alto e muita das vezes o trabalho ainda em sistema analógico, manual, braçal, requer a presença do funcionário. Muitas empresas para manter a produção, precisarão contratar mais. Como farão isso pagando mais impostos, mais funcionários, apenas para manter a produção? O governo está disposto a reduzir impostos para compensar essas contratações?