Português 
Inglês 
Espanhol 
3 min de leitura 
4 comentários 
Final Ruling Puts Brazilians With Debts Over 5 Years at Risk, and Serasa Responds
Brazilians with debts were caught off guard by a recent decision from the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), which puts millions of people at risk who were previously confident that their financial issues had expired after five years. Now, even with the expiration of the debt, the name remains on Serasa. This change brings new challenges for those trying to recover credit in the market.
With over 62.5 million people having bad credit in Brazil, this decision directly affects a significant portion of the population, especially those who relied on the “expiration” of the debt after five years. But what exactly has changed?
Name on Serasa Even With Expired Debt: What Does This Mean?
Until now, the rule was clear: after five years, the debt expired, and the debtor’s name was removed from default registries like Serasa. This removal was also important for calculating the Score, an index used by financial institutions to assess consumer credit.
-
Brazilian city gains industrial hub for 85 companies that is equivalent to 55 football fields.
-
Peugeot and Citroën factory in Argentina cuts production by half and opens a layoff program for more than 2,000 employees after Brazil drastically reduced purchases of Argentine vehicles.
-
A Brazilian city gains a factory worth R$ 300 million with the capacity to process 200 thousand tons of wheat per year, a mill of 660 tons/day, silos for 42 thousand tons, and an industrial area of 276 thousand m².
-
Havan will leave the shopping mall in Blumenau to inaugurate something that the chain has never done before: a megastore in half-timbered style in the Historic Center of the city, which is expected to be completed in May and change the landscape of local retail.
With the new decision, the debt remains expired, meaning the creditor can no longer legally pursue the debtor. However, the STJ determined that the debtor’s name will not be completely removed from Serasa’s registry, but rather from areas like Serasa Limpa Nome, which may continue to hinder access to credit for millions of Brazilians with debts.
STJ Decision: Understanding the Case
The case that led to the decision involved a debtor with an expired debt, who requested the removal of their name from the Serasa Limpa Nome registry. They took legal action asking for the debt to be considered unenforceable and for their name to be removed from any list of debtors. However, the STJ denied the request.
The justification was that, although the debt has expired and can no longer be legally pursued, it still exists at its source, and the debtor’s name remains in the registry, potentially impacting their financial history.
How to Clear Your Name on Serasa?
If you are among the millions of Brazilians with debts and want to clear your name, Serasa offers an opportunity to resolve debts with discounts that can reach 90%. This program aims to facilitate consumers’ financial regularization and improve their chances of returning to the credit market.
The steps are simple:
Access the Serasa Limpa Nome app or website;
Log into the platform and click on “Solutions”;
Select the option “validate payment method”;
Fill in the field with the received Pix code or slip;
If the code is reliable, just pay securely.
Serasa recommends that if the code cannot be identified, the user should review the details before making the payment, ensuring they are dealing with a valid charge.
New Scenario for Brazilians With Debts
The STJ decision creates a new scenario for Brazilians with debts, as although the expiration continues to prevent legal collection, the impact on Serasa’s registry persists. For those looking to clear their name, the Serasa Limpa Nome program is a valuable opportunity, but the new rule makes it clear that the fight for a clean financial history will be more challenging than ever.
Now, more than ever, it is essential for consumers to seek to regularize their debts, taking advantage of negotiation opportunities and staying informed about their financial rights and responsibilities.
FOR MORE INFORMATION: The new law that requires all new vehicles to leave the factory with a series of new safety items has come into effect.
Leave your comment so we know your opinion! This new STJ decision regarding Brazilians with debts is causing a lot of discussions. Do you think this will further complicate the lives of those who are already in debt, or do you see this measure as an incentive to regularize outstanding debts?
PARABÉNS, O AMOR VENCEU MAIS UMA VEZ……MELHOR PERDOAR AS DÍVIDAS DE OUTROS PAÍSES DO QUE PERDOAR AS DÍVIDAS DO SEU POVO….MUITO BEM! FAZ O L.
Nesse “Governo”, para o pobre coitado nunca será fácil as coisas?
Cadê a Lei? Pelo que eu saiba tem que ser legislado, aprovado pela Câmara de deputados, deliberado pelo Senado, sancionado e assinado pelo atual presidente, após ser divulgado no diário Oficial. Só a decisão do STJ, não é válido para todos. É um fato isolado. Pelo que entendo, o STJ não tem competência para legislar.
Além do mais, nem todos com restrição no CPF, são individuais. Sofri um golpe no cartão de crédito, fui roubada no valor de mais ou menos R$4.000,00. No dua 08/07/2021, quando percebi o golpe, entrei no SAC da CEF, bloqueie o cartão dd crédito e acresenttei não reconhecer 3 dividas realizadas pelo “vigarista”. A CEF slem sd sustar as três dívidas. Está me cobrando h9je 16.000,00. Quem deve ser penalizado, eu com meu CPF, ou a CEF?.
Irei aguardar os cinco anos, e se, está decisão não sd tornar lei. Eu entrarei bontra a CEF. CRIMINALIZANDO esra por não ter realizado o protocolo. E quanto a decisão do STF, no meu entender, abrir precedente para o meu caso, criminalizar a CEF, por acréscimo o SERASA , caso o meu nome não seja baixado da inadimplência.
A SERASA todos os dias, faz ameaças. Cuidado!
Nos brasileiros não estamos tão desinformados assim!. Além do mais, eu nunca devi e não devo nada do que eu compro.
Diante o exposto, solicito que o SERASA, pegue leve nos seus avisos d convites para cobranças. Já está caracterizando ameaças, além de constrangimento a quem tem restrição no CPF. Não interessa, sd seja põe haver sofrido GOLPE de vigarista, meu caso. Seja por que, a pessoa está indivudado mesmo.
CUIDADO, com os seus textos SERASA!!