Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
5 min of reading 
0 comments 
After Agreement with Febraban and ABBC, INSS Resumes Requiring Operational Costs of Consignment, Regularizes Accumulated Values, Strengthens Governance, and Affirms That Beneficiaries Will Not Have Deductions on Payroll.
The INSS has decided to resume the collection of operational costs related to payroll loans and announced a total amount of R$ 148.4 million to be paid by banks offering this type of loan linked to social security benefits. The collection had been suspended since 2022 and is now returning as part of an agreement formalized with entities from the banking sector.
According to the INSS, the measure targets financial institutions that are accredited and maintain a Technical Cooperation Agreement to operate the payroll loan system. The objective is to cover the administration, control, and security of the operations conducted within the payroll itself of the benefits, with a promise to enhance governance and ensure that retirees and pensioners are not affected.
What INSS Is Charging and Where the Amount of R$ 148.4 Million Comes From
The INSS will resume charging R$ 148.4 million related to the operational cost of payroll loans.
-
50 viaducts, 4 tunnels, 28 bridges, and 40 kilometers of bike paths: BR-262 in Espírito Santo will receive 8.6 billion reais for the largest engineering project in the state’s history, inspired by the Immigrant Highway in São Paulo.
-
Brazil produces too much clean energy and doesn’t know what to do with it: over 20% of solar and wind capacity was wasted in 2025 while investors flee and 509 renewable generation projects were abandoned in the last year.
-
Piauí will produce a new fuel that replaces diesel without needing to change anything in the truck’s engine and reduces pollutant gas emissions by half: truck drivers from all over the Northeast are already celebrating the news that will arrive later this decade.
-
A new Brazilian shopping center worth R$ 400 million will be built in an area equivalent to more than 4 football fields, featuring 90 stores, 5 cinemas, a supermarket, a college, and parking for 1,700 cars, potentially generating 3,000 jobs.
This amount is linked to payroll loan operations tied to social security benefits and conducted by accredited financial institutions.
The total includes accumulated fees during the period when the collection was suspended, since 2022.
In other words, this is not just a “cost from now on,” but also a regularization of what was pending while the fees were not being collected.
Who Pays This Bill and Which Banks Are Subject to the Rule
The INSS charges apply to financial institutions that enter into a Technical Cooperation Agreement to operate the payroll loan system.
In practice, these are the banks and institutions authorized to offer loans with payroll deductions for social security beneficiaries, using the processing structure of the social security system itself.
These institutions, according to the described rule, must bear costs related to the management, security, and control of the operations that take place directly on the payroll of the benefits.
The focus, therefore, is on the operational functioning of the mechanism that allows for automatic deductions.
The Agreement with Febraban and ABBC and Why It Changes the Game
The measure was formalized after an agreement was reached with the Brazilian Federation of Banks, Febraban, and the Brazilian Association of Banks, ABBC.
This agreement has two main effects: it regularizes the amounts that remained open during the suspension and reinforces the requirement for payment by banks operating payroll loans.
By linking the resumption of collection to an understanding with the representative entities, the INSS seeks to reduce friction and provide predictability, making it clear that the fee is not an improvisation, but a legally anticipated charge that has been reintroduced.
Why INSS Says the Charge Strengthens Control and Security
The INSS states that the operational cost involves the administration, security, and control of operations. This includes managing the flow of payroll loans within the payroll, the control mechanisms, and the layer of security needed for operations to occur with traceability, compliance, and governance.
The logic presented is that if financial institutions benefit from the channel that allows them to offer payroll loans with direct deductions, they need to fund the operational apparatus that sustains this machinery within the social security system.
Suspension Since 2022 and Resumption with Regularization of Accumulated Values
One of the central points of the decision is the return of a collection that had been suspended since 2022.
With the agreement, the amounts owed are now being regularized and total, so far, R$ 148.4 million.
The message from the INSS is that it is not just about “resuming collection,” but closing the accounts for the period when the charge was not enforced and getting the rules back in operation for institutions that continue to operate with this type of credit.
The Promised Impact: Financial Balance Without Affecting the Beneficiary
The INSS maintains that the measure can bring financial balance to the system without causing negative impacts on beneficiaries.
The agency asserts that there will be no harm to social security beneficiaries, reinforcing that the charge is directed at financial institutions and not at retirees, pensioners, or insured individuals.
The central message is clear: the charged money is intended to fund operations and strengthen governance, but it will not be passed on as an additional deduction on the beneficiaries’ payroll, according to the disclosed positioning.
What Changes in Practice for the Operation of Consignment
With the resumption of charges, the operational framework of the payroll loan system becomes more rigid in the sense of requiring costs from those participating in the system through the Technical Cooperation Agreement. This reinforces the idea that operating payroll loans is not just about selling credit, but integrating into a control and processing structure within the social security system.
The INSS also presents the resumption as a way to ensure compliance with legislation and strengthen governance.
In practice, this is likely to mean greater compliance demands and operational rules for accredited banks, as the cost is precisely associated with management, control, and security within the payroll.
What Stays on the Radar of the Financial System from Now On
The charge of R$ 148.4 million increases pressure on the financial system because it creates a formalized and retroactive operational cost for the suspended period while reinforcing that the requirement will once again be part of the functioning of payroll loans.
For banks that rely heavily on this modality, the message is that the channel for social security payroll loans has rules, costs, and governance that must be adhered to in order to continue operating, including oversight and control related to the payroll.
Do you think that INSS will really be able to increase control over payroll loans without banks passing this cost on to the end customer in some way?
-
-
-
-
4 pessoas reagiram a isso.