Português 
Inglês 
Espanhol 
3 min de leitura 
1 comentário 
Employer Must Pay Double Vacation If Deadline Is Not Respected, Warns Alexandre Ferreira. Labor Lawyer Explains That If The Company Does Not Grant Vacation Within The Legal Deadline, The Employer Must Pay Double Vacation To The Employee, Ensuring Financial Protection And Compliance With The Legislation.
Vacation is an essential right of the worker, but when not granted in a timely manner, serious consequences arise for the employer. According to labor lawyer Alexandre Ferreira (OAB/MS 14646), a specialist in Labor Law, the employer must pay double vacation if the legal deadline provided by the Consolidation of Labor Laws (CLT) is exceeded. The rule serves as a form of penalty and ensures that the employee is not harmed.
The guidance is clear: after 12 months of service, the worker acquires the right to vacation, starting the so-called acquisition period. From that point on, the company has another 12 months — the granting period — to schedule and grant the rest. If this deadline expires without the vacation being taken, the employer is obliged to pay double the amount, including the constitutional additional of one third.
What Does The CLT Say About Expired Vacation
Article 137 of the CLT is categorical in determining that, if the vacation is not granted within the deadline, payment must be made in double. This rule exists to protect the worker from unjustified delays and to pressure the employer to respect mandatory rest.
-
Brazilian city gains industrial hub for 85 companies that is equivalent to 55 football fields.
-
Peugeot and Citroën factory in Argentina cuts production by half and opens a layoff program for more than 2,000 employees after Brazil drastically reduced purchases of Argentine vehicles.
-
A Brazilian city gains a factory worth R$ 300 million with the capacity to process 200 thousand tons of wheat per year, a mill of 660 tons/day, silos for 42 thousand tons, and an industrial area of 276 thousand m².
-
Havan will leave the shopping mall in Blumenau to inaugurate something that the chain has never done before: a megastore in half-timbered style in the Historic Center of the city, which is expected to be completed in May and change the landscape of local retail.
Additionally, Article 134 reinforces that vacation needs to be granted within the 12 months following the acquisition period. This prevents the employee from accumulating years without enjoying the right, which could compromise their physical and mental health.
The Responsibility Is Always The Company’s
A common doubt is whether double payment can be avoided when the employee does not formally request vacation. Alexandre Ferreira explains that the responsibility lies entirely with the company, which must manage deadlines and organize rest schedules. In other words, even if the employee does not request it, if the deadline expires, the employer must pay double vacation.
This rule protects the worker from situations where companies fail to grant the benefit for convenience, violating the legislation. It is up to the employer to plan and adhere to the calendar properly.
Late Payment: Does It Still Count As Double?
There was an old understanding from the Superior Labor Court (Súmula 450) that payment made after the deadline, but within the granting period, required double payment. However, the Supreme Federal Court (STF) overturned this interpretation, declaring the summary unconstitutional.
As a result, double payment is only required when vacations are not granted within the legal period. If the company only delays the payment, but respects the granting period, there is no obligation to double the amount — although this practice can still lead to administrative penalties.
What Can The Worker Do In Case Of Expired Vacation
If the company does not comply with the law, the employee can try to resolve the issue administratively with HR or direct supervisors. If there is no solution, it is possible to take the case to Labor Court, armed with evidence such as paychecks and time records.
According to the CLT, the worker can claim expired vacation up to five years after the period, respecting the limit of two years after the end of the contract. In addition to double payment, the employer can be fined by the Ministry of Labor in case of inspection.
Alexandre Ferreira’s warning emphasizes that employers must pay double vacation when the legal deadline is not respected, ensuring financial protection for the worker and avoiding harm to the right to rest. For companies, the message is clear: planning is essential to avoid extra costs and labor lawsuits.
And you, have you ever been in a situation where your vacation expired without being granted? Do you think it is fair for the employer to pay double in these cases? Leave your opinion in the comments — your experience can help other workers.
Durante a pandemia, eu recebi a multa das férias duas vezes. Foi muito bom financeiramente.