1. Home
  2. / Science and Technology
  3. / Scientists discover that humanity has exchanged one environmental disaster for another: the same chemicals that saved the ozone layer are now contaminating rivers, aquifers, and human blood with an eternal pollutant that is impossible to remove.
Reading time 5 min of reading Comments 0 comments

Scientists discover that humanity has exchanged one environmental disaster for another: the same chemicals that saved the ozone layer are now contaminating rivers, aquifers, and human blood with an eternal pollutant that is impossible to remove.

Published on 28/03/2026 at 01:15
Seja o primeiro a reagir!
Reagir ao artigo

A study reveals that CFC substitutes have deposited 335 thousand tons of TFA on the Earth’s surface. Contamination by this eternal pollutant affects rivers, aquifers, and human blood in a new silent environmental disaster that exposes the limits of the solution adopted to protect the ozone layer.

The elimination of chlorofluorocarbons was celebrated for decades as one of humanity’s greatest environmental achievements. The Montreal Protocol worked, the ozone layer is recovering, and the story seemed to end on a positive note. But researchers from Lancaster University have just shown that humanity may have exchanged one environmental disaster for another that is quieter, slower, and potentially more difficult to resolve.

The study, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, reveals that CFC substitutes—the same chemicals adopted to protect the ozone layer—decompose in the atmosphere and generate trifluoroacetic acid, known as TFA, an eternal pollutant from the PFAS family that already contaminates rivers, aquifers, rainwater, food, and even human blood. The estimate is that about 335,500 metric tons of TFA have been deposited on the Earth’s surface between 2000 and 2022, and the load continues to increase year after year.

What is TFA and why is it considered an eternal pollutant

Trifluoroacetic acid is a fluorinated acid molecule that belongs to the same family as PFAS—the so-called “eternal chemicals” because they resist decomposition in nature. Once formed, TFA easily dissolves in water, moves with rivers and groundwater, and is extremely difficult to remove with conventional treatment plants.

Unlike industrial pollutants that degrade slowly or bind to sediments, TFA remains in circulation indefinitely. This characteristic makes it a particularly concerning type of environmental contaminant.

Lancaster researchers estimate that CFC substitutes and certain anesthetic gases have already deposited approximately one-third of a million tons of TFA on the planet, and the accumulated volume is only expected to grow, as the originating gases can remain in the atmosphere for decades before decomposing.

How gases that protect the ozone layer became an environmental disaster

The mechanism is straightforward. When the world abandoned CFCs, the industry began using other fluorinated gases—HCFCs and HFCs—in refrigerators, heat pumps, and air conditioning systems.

These substitutes cause much less damage to the ozone layer, but many of them decompose into TFA in the upper atmosphere, and the pollutant returns to Earth with rain or deposits directly on land and water.

In practice, every time a supermarket refrigerator runs or an air conditioner is turned on during a hot summer night, a small part of the refrigeration chain contributes to this slow chemical rain. This is not a dramatic leak, but a constant drizzle that accumulates silently year after year.

The global model developed by the researchers suggests that the annual production of TFA from these chemicals could peak at any moment between now and the end of this century, even with the gradual reduction in the use of these gases.

From Arctic ice to human blood: where TFA has been found

One of the most revealing findings of the study is that measurements taken from Arctic ice cores thousands of kilometers from any factory confirm that almost all of the TFA retained in the ice can be explained by the decomposition of CFC substitutes transported by wind around the globe. The contamination is not local; it is planetary.

Closer to where people live, monitoring campaigns have found TFA in rainwater, rivers, bottled mineral waters, cereal-based foods, and even in human blood and breast milk.

A report from the Pesticide Action Network Europe documented contamination in deep aquifers used for bottled water supply in Europe, while other studies measured the presence of the compound in tap water and food products in various countries.

The scenario sets up a slow-motion environmental disaster that is only now beginning to be quantified.

What regulatory bodies say about health risk

The position of regulators is still ambiguous. The European Chemicals Agency classifies TFA, this eternal pollutant, as harmful to aquatic life, with lasting effects.

The Federal Department of Chemicals in Germany has proposed labeling it as potentially toxic to human reproduction, which would significantly raise the alert level regarding the compound.

At the same time, a review by the Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety found clear human exposure in medical and environmental contexts, but no consistent clinical damage at current environmental levels although the available data is limited.

The lead author of the Lancaster study, Lucy Hart, states that CFC substitutes are likely the main atmospheric source of TFA, and co-author Ryan Hossaini argues that the increasing levels of fluorinated gases are widespread, persistent, and rising.

The new generation of refrigerants may worsen the environmental disaster

The study also highlights that the latest generation of refrigerants, known as HFOs—especially HFO-1234yf, used in automotive air conditioning systems—is an emerging and likely increasing atmospheric source of TFA.

This means that the transition to gases with lower global warming potential may be exacerbating the problem of contamination by eternal pollutants.

The issue raises an uncomfortable dilemma for environmental policies. If a harmful gas is replaced by another without checking what happens throughout its entire life cycle, is humanity solving the problem or just changing its form?

For most people, this environmental disaster will never be as visible as the hole in the ozone layer was. However, researchers warn that the extreme persistence of TFA means that decisions made today about refrigerants and chemicals will have repercussions on rivers, soils, and sources of drinking water for generations.

What do you think of this discovery? Do you believe that governments and industries will act in time, or are we repeating the pattern of creating a new problem while solving the previous one? Leave your opinion in the comments.

Inscreva-se
Notificar de
guest
0 Comentários
Mais recente
Mais antigos Mais votado
Feedbacks
Visualizar todos comentários
Maria Heloisa Barbosa Borges

Falo sobre construção, mineração, minas brasileiras, petróleo e grandes projetos ferroviários e de engenharia civil. Diariamente escrevo sobre curiosidades do mercado brasileiro.

Share in apps
0
Adoraríamos sua opnião sobre esse assunto, comente!x