Consumer from Cuiabá Was Summoned by the Police in Santa Catarina and Discovered an Account Opened in His Name; Justice Condemned the Bank to Pay Compensation for Failure in Data Verification and Negligence in Security.
A consumer from Cuiabá experienced an unusual and distressing situation upon discovering that a bank account had been opened in his name without any authorization. The case escalated when he was summoned by the police in Camboriú (SC) to testify in an investigation of fraud involving the fraudulent account.
According to the portal Conjur, the fraud led the Court of Justice of Mato Grosso (TJ-MT) to confirm the bank’s condemnation to pay compensation of R$ 8 thousand for moral damages, in addition to declaring the contract nonexistent. The decision recognized the financial institution’s failure to prove the authenticity of the data and reinforced the banks’ responsibility in cases of fraud.
The Scam and the Unexpected Discovery
According to the records, the consumer only became aware of the account when he received a police summons to clarify suspicious operations in Santa Catarina.
-
The Senate approves a bill that criminalizes misogyny, hatred, or aversion towards women, and includes the crime in the Racism Law with a penalty of up to 5 years.
-
Chamber Approves Bill That Allows Pepper Spray for Women Over 16 and Imposes Strict Rules for Purchase, Possession, and Use as Self-Defense
-
Chamber Approves Law to Combat Leucaena, Fast-Growing Plant That Dominates Land and Threatens Native Species in Various Regions of the Country
-
Asset Division: Know What Cannot Be Divided in Case of Divorce
Scammers had used his personal data to open and move the account, which was being used in fraudulent schemes.
The episode caused embarrassment, insecurity, and psychological distress, as the man began to be investigated as if he were responsible for the frauds.
The shock led him to take legal action, requesting the closure of the account, the exclusion of any debt, and compensation for the damages suffered.
Bank’s Defense and Failure in Verification
In its defense, the bank tried to absolve itself, claiming that it had followed security protocols and insinuating that the client might have facilitated access to his data.
However, the institution did not manage to prove the legality of the account opening, nor provide essential documents such as identity copies, digital records, or electronic signatures.
The lack of this evidence made the negligence in the verification and security mechanisms of the financial institution evident. The court understood that there was serious failure in internal procedures, which allowed the fraudsters’ actions and resulted in direct damage to the victim.
Activity Risk and Objective Responsibility
The case rapporteur, Judge Sebastião de Arruda Almeida, emphasized that financial institutions assume the risks inherent to the activities they conduct. Citing Summary 479 of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), he reminded that banks are objectively liable — that is, regardless of fault for frauds and crimes committed by third parties in banking operations.
For the magistrate, it was clear that the bank’s negligence contributed to the irregular opening of the account and the moral damage caused to the consumer.
The amount of R$ 8 thousand in compensation was deemed reasonable and proportional, serving both as restitution and as a warning to the institution regarding the need to strengthen its security measures.
Sentence Upheld and Pedagogical Value
Based on this understanding, the 5th Chamber of Private Law upheld the first-instance ruling in its entirety.
In addition to the compensation of R$ 8 thousand, the bank was ordered to bear the legal costs and attorney’s fees.
The rapporteur highlighted that the decision seeks to repair the moral damage and prevent the recurrence of similar failures, reaffirming that the duty to protect the consumer is central to the banking relationship.
The court reinforced that, in cases of fraud, it is up to the financial institution to demonstrate the authenticity of the data and prove that it followed all security protocols, something that did not occur in this process.
The case illustrates that the lack of proper verification can lead to serious financial and emotional consequences for the consumer and result in penalties for the bank.
The decision reinforces the understanding that the responsibility for the security of operations lies with the institution, not the client.
And you, do you think the decision to set compensation at R$ 8 thousand for cases of banking fraud is fair? Or do you believe the amount should be higher given the inconveniences suffered by the victim? Leave your opinion in the comments; we want to hear from those who have been through similar situations.

-
-
-
-
-
-
50 pessoas reagiram a isso.