Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
7 min of reading 
0 comments 
Pressured by the War in Ukraine and Doubts About U.S. Protection, Germany Returns to the Military Center of Europe and Promises the Largest Army on the Continent. The Bundeswehr Accelerates Purchases of Kamikaze Drones, F35s and Tries to Unblock the Navy Stuck by F126, Aiming for 460,000 Soldiers.
The promise of the largest army on the continent reappears in the official vocabulary of a country that spent decades trying to maintain a symbolic distance from military power. In practice, Germany wants to transform the Bundeswehr into a robust force, with kamikaze drones, F35 fighters, and a navy that is still stumbling over the F126 case.
The push comes from two sides. On one side, the war in Ukraine and the declared fear that Russia will not stop there. On the other, political insecurity about how far the U.S. will sustain protection via NATO in a scenario of changes in Washington, and Berlin starts to act as if 2029 were a clock on the wall.
Where the Shift Comes From and Who Is Pulling the Lever
After World War II, Germany was disarmed under Allied occupation and it took until November 1955 to have armed forces again, when the Bundeswehr was created and integrated into NATO.
-
Friends have been building a small “town” for 30 years to grow old together, with compact houses, a common area, nature surrounding it, and a collective life project designed for friendship, coexistence, and simplicity.
-
This small town in Germany created its own currency 24 years ago, today it circulates millions per year, is accepted in over 300 stores, and the German government allowed all of this to happen under one condition.
-
Curitiba is shrinking and is expected to lose 97,000 residents by 2050, while inland cities in Paraná such as Sarandi, Araucária, and Toledo are experiencing accelerated growth that is changing the entire state’s map.
-
Tourists were poisoned on Everest in a million-dollar fraud scheme involving helicopters that diverted over $19 million and shocked international authorities.
This past explains why the current debate is sensitive: rearmament is not only technical; it is moral, social, and electoral.
In political command, Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Defense Minister Boris Pistorius put an explicit target on the table: Germany would have the most robust armed forces in Europe and would seek, in record time, the largest army on the continent.
The statement does not exist in isolation; it is tied to the fear of a leap in conflict and the calculation of deterrence.
New Money, New Debt, and the Bill That Grows Before the Result
The promised military reconstruction for the Bundeswehr depends on figures that escape the country’s historical standard.
One cited example is the opening of a legal pathway to seek money through new debt, with 108 billion euros made available for defense investment.
Additionally, there is the estimate of 18 billion euros just in 2026, a figure described as unprecedented.
The size of the check is part of the message, as it attempts to signal speed to allies and adversaries alike, reinforcing the idea that the largest army on the continent would be more than just a slogan.
However, money does not automatically translate into capability. Between contracts, industrial timelines, training, and logistics, the Bundeswehr needs to absorb new systems without stalling daily operations.
And, when a figure seems out of place, like the total cost of the F35 package cited as “almost 10 million euros,” the lack of detail becomes a blind spot that feeds public doubt.
Kamikaze Drones Enter the Arsenal and Open a Flank in Defense
The decision to purchase kamikaze drones is treated as a break.
For years, Germany avoided attack drones and mainly maintained reconnaissance drones, in a debate that included criticism about the trivialization of violence by remotely operated unmanned weapons.
The war in Ukraine shifts the axis because drones are now described as decisive in combat.
In this package, the Bundeswehr orders guided missiles of the Heron TP type, produced in Israel, and includes kamikaze drones as an additional novelty.
Kamikaze drones are presented as flying ammunition, equipped with a warhead that dives into the target and destroys itself upon impact, a type of technology that combines precision with escalation risk.
However, the shift exposes the other side of the problem: defense against drones. Episodes of airspace violations in European countries, including near airports and barracks in Germany, are cited as a warning.
There is talk of the Sky Ranger 30 anti-aircraft tank from the German company Rheinmetall, capable of combating swarms of drones, but the expected delivery is only from 2027, and experts question whether 19 units are sufficient.
F35 and the Nuclear Umbrella That Ties Germany to the U.S.
The purchase of the F35A appears as a symbol of interoperability and also of dependence.
The German government orders 35 aircraft from Lockheed Martin, described as the most advanced fighter in the world, and the choice is associated with NATO’s logic: the F35 can be armed with a U.S. nuclear bomb, which fits the German fleet into the bloc’s nuclear umbrella.
This point is central because it affects domestic politics and external perception.
While Berlin tries to strengthen the Bundeswehr to achieve the largest army on the continent, it also bets on American systems to fulfill deterrence missions, even when political confidence in the U.S. is described as less solid.
The shopping list also includes 60 heavy transport helicopters from Boeing, with a total cost of 7 billion and 300 million euros, and P8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft, with sensors described as capable of monitoring large areas of the sea and detecting submarines.
The first of these aircraft was reportedly delivered to the German navy last year.
F126, the Knot of the Navy and the Limit of Accelerated Rearmament
If the discourse is speed, the navy exposes the friction with industry and management.
The F126 frigate is described as the largest warship under construction for the German navy, celebrated in the announcement but frustrating in execution, with a Dutch shipyard unable to implement the plans.
The project is already associated with a cost of 1 billion and 800 million euros, and to try to save the contract, a German company called Vessels LON would take on the task of moving the construction forward.
However, time does not wait. With commitments to NATO, the cited provisional solution is to purchase additional frigates from another German shipyard, TKMS, at an additional cost of 7 billion and 800 million euros.
The political consequence is direct: when the F126 stalls, it becomes an argument for those who say that the largest army on the continent depends on bottlenecks that Berlin does not control alone.
The F126 also becomes a symbol of how giant contracts can multiply costs and open a gap between promise and delivery.
460,000 Soldiers, Reserve, and the Question That Does Not Fade Away on the Streets
The personnel plan is the most delicate part because it involves society and recruitment.
Parliament approves a budget to buy uniforms and equipment for a total of 460,000 soldiers, men and women, including the reserve, while the Bundeswehr is described as having only 184,000 soldiers in its current active force.
This leap is questioned precisely because it seems too great a gap between the present and the ambition.
Germany suspended compulsory military service in 2011 and now the indicated direction is opposite, with debates about possibly increasing personnel in light of new threats.
Even if money and equipment exist, forming personnel takes time. Training, specialization, maintenance, command structure, and operational readiness need to align with new technologies.
Without people, kamikaze drones and F35s become showpieces, and the promise of the largest army on the continent falls into the same place it has fallen for decades: on paper.
2029 as a Psychological Deadline and Deterrence as a Declared Objective
The ghost of 2029 enters the debate as a marker of urgency. The most repeated phrase is attributed to the Defense Minister, who in June 2024 said in the Bundestag that Germany should be prepared for war by 2029, under the logic of deterrence.
The detail is that the figure arises from an internal NATO analysis from 2023 that spoke of up to five years, recounted as 2029 when the statement occurs in 2024.
This idea receives criticism attributed to the intelligence service BND, which argues that calculating an attack is not simple, as variables are dynamic.
The progress of the war in Ukraine and the commitment of President Donald Trump to NATO appear as examples of factors that could change the timeline.
In the end, 2029 functions less as a prediction and more as a political tool. It helps justify debt, contracts, and recruitment, and pressures every decision in Berlin.
The risk is that the deadline accelerates purchases without consolidating capability, and Germany ends up with a Bundeswehr that is more expensive, more complex, and still far from the largest army on the continent.
Germany tries to reconcile three things that rarely fit into the same space: historical memory, strategic urgency, and industrial bureaucracy.
Between kamikaze drones, F35s, the F126 saga, and the goal of 460,000 soldiers, the Bundeswehr is undergoing a process where each choice has a cost and consequence.
If 2029 is the haunting deadline, the real question is another: what is the political price of transforming Germany into the largest army on the continent and, at the same time, accepting that part of the firepower depends on external chains and a strained NATO?
What do you find more plausible, a Bundeswehr truly ready by 2029 or an expensive package that delivers more promise than readiness? And when you hear “largest army on the continent,” does that sound like a necessity, exaggeration, or a risk to Europe itself?
-
-
-
-
-
-
22 pessoas reagiram a isso.