1. Home
  2. / Interesting facts
  3. / While Others Work More, They Reduced: Country Adopted Four-Day Work Week With Equal Pay, Fewer Absences, and Happier Employees, But Economists Warn That Stagnant Productivity Could Put The Entire Model at Risk in The Future
Reading time 5 min of reading Comments 0 comments

While Others Work More, They Reduced: Country Adopted Four-Day Work Week With Equal Pay, Fewer Absences, and Happier Employees, But Economists Warn That Stagnant Productivity Could Put The Entire Model at Risk in The Future

Published on 13/02/2026 at 21:26
Updated on 13/02/2026 at 21:35
Holanda testa quatro dias na jornada de trabalho com salário igual; produtividade preocupa enquanto qualidade de vida melhora.
Holanda testa quatro dias na jornada de trabalho com salário igual; produtividade preocupa enquanto qualidade de vida melhora.
  • Reação
  • Reação
  • Reação
  • Reação
8 pessoas reagiram a isso.
Reagir ao artigo

According To The BBC Portal, The Four-Day Experience In The Netherlands Has Become A Quiet Reference For Companies Seeking A Balance Between Work And Personal Life Without Cutting Salaries. In Cities Like Amsterdam, Businesses Of Different Sizes Have Tested The Reduced Workweek Of 32 Hours, Maintaining Pay And Reorganizing Internal Priorities.

The Debate, However, Is Far From Simple. The Country Combines Shorter Work Hours With High Income, But Faces A Technical Warning: Productivity Has Not Increased In The Last 15 Years, While The Population Ages And The Labor Supply Shrinks. The Model Works Today, But Carries Difficult Questions About Tomorrow.

How The Four-Day Week Went From Discourse To Routine

In Practice, The Change Did Not Start With A Unique Decree, Nor With Loud Campaigns. It Has Been Consolidated In Companies And Sectors That Began To Treat Four Days As A Feasible Operational Method Rather Than An “Extra” Benefit.

An Example Comes From Amsterdam, In The De Pijp District, Where Partners Gavin Arm And Bert De Wit Of Positivity Branding Adopted The Shortened Week Seven Years Ago.

In This Arrangement, The Team Did Not Experience A Salary Reduction And Was Also Not Pushed To “Compensate” With Longer Hours In Fewer Days. The Structure Remained At 32 Weekly Hours, With Eight Hours Per Day. The Logic Advocated By The Managers Is Clear: To Work More Judiciously, Not With More Gross Volume Of Hours.

This Movement Also Gained Institutional Support. The Main Dutch Union, The FNV, Pressures To Transform The Practice Into A Broader Official Recommendation. Even Without Total Formalization, Workers Already Have The Legal Right To Request A Reduction In Hours, Creating A More Favorable Environment To Expand The Model.

What Changed Within Companies: Less Noise, More Focus, And Initial Resistance

The Adoption Of Four Days Brought Reported Effects From HR Leaders And Teams: Reduced Absences, Improved Retention, And A Perception Of Greater Well-Being. At The Software Company Nmbrs, For Example, There Was A Decrease In Medical Leaves And An Increase In Employee Retention After The Change.

However, The Path Was Not Linear. The Proposal Faced Doubts From Investors And Skepticism From Employees, Especially In The Beginning, With The Classic Concern: “If It’s Already Difficult To Deliver In Five Days, How Can It Fit In Four?”.

The Answer Came With Changes In Methods, Not With Blind Acceleration Of The Routine: Fewer Meetings, Stricter Priorities, And Clarity About What Really Generates Results.

Another Recurring Point In The Dutch Experience Is The Creative Gain Outside Of Office Hours. The Idea Is Not To Treat Free Time As “Idle Time,” But As A Space For Mental Recovery That Improves Decisions And Execution Quality.

In Summary, The Shorter Workweek Only Works When There Is Organizational Discipline To Protect Focus And Reduce Internal Waste.

The Dutch Economic Paradox: Shorter Hours, High Income, And Stagnant Productivity

The Netherlands Has The Lowest Average Weekly Working Hours In The European Union: 32.1 Hours, Below The Block Average Of 36 Hours.

At The Same Time, It Maintains One Of The Highest Per Capita GDPs In Europe And A High Position Among OECD Countries. This Set Of Factors Challenges The Traditional Narrative That Competitiveness Necessarily Depends On Long Hours.

However, The Complete Picture Includes A Significant Yellow Signal. OECD Economists Highlight That, Although Dutch Productivity Is High, It Has Not Advanced In The Last 15 Years. In Simple Terms: The Country Is Already Operating At A Strong Level But Without Recent Gains In Speed.

This Poses A Structural Risk. If Productivity Does Not Accelerate And The Workforce Decreases With An Aging Population, The Sustainability Of The Four-Day Strategy Is Pressured.

The Model May Continue To Exist, But Will Require Compensations: Increase Production Per Workday, Expand Labor Market Participation, Or Combine Both.

Where The Most Difficult Knot Is: Part-Time, Taxes, And Inequality Of Hours

The Netherlands Has The Highest Proportion Of Part-Time Workers Among OECD Countries: Almost Half Of Employees Work Less Than Full-Time. Relatively High Salaries And Tax Design On Intermediate Brackets Reduce The Incentive For Additional Hours, Leading Many Families To Exchange Income For Free Time.

Government Data Indicates That 3 Out Of 4 Women And 1 Out Of 4 Men Work Less Than 35 Hours A Week. This Pattern Helps To Explain Why The Four-Day Week Gained Social Adherence, But Also Exposes A Scale Limit When The Economy Needs More Labor Supply.

The Gender Issue Appears Strongly In This Debate. Although The Female Employment Rate Is High, More Than Half Of Women Remain In Part-Time Positions—About Three Times The OECD Average.

Barriers Such As Accessible Childcare, Tax Burdens, And The Complexity Of Benefits For The Second Provider In A Family Can Discourage Extended Work Hours.

Add To This A Cultural Component: A 2024 Survey Showed Conservative Views On Motherhood And Work, With A Strong Difference Between Expectations Directed Toward Mothers And Fathers.

Four Days In The Future: How To Preserve Social Gains Without Losing Economic Traction

The Main Merit Of The Four-Day Week Is Concrete: It Improves Life Balance And Can Make Jobs More Attractive In Areas With A Shortage Of Professionals, Such As Education And Health. In Tight Labor Markets, This Affects Retention And Recruitment.

At The Same Time, The Macroeconomic Warning Cannot Be Ignored. There Is A Limit To Sustaining Growth With Few Workers And Stagnant Productivity.

If The Country Does Not Unlock Gains In Efficiency And Does Not Increase Labor Participation, The Burden Tends To Get Heavier With The Advance Of The Retirement Of The Active Population.

Therefore, The Mature Discussion Is Not “Four Days: Yes Or No”. The Real Discussion Is “Under What Conditions Does This Model Remain Viable For Decades”. This Involves Tax Design, Care Policies, Productivity Management Within Companies, And Social Choices About The Distribution Of Time, Income, And Work.

The Netherlands Shows That Reducing Hours With Preserved Salaries Can Work And Generate Positive Effects On Occupational Health, Retention, And Job Satisfaction.

But It Also Highlights That Well-Being And Economic Sustainability Need To Go Hand In Hand: When Productivity Stagnates And The Worker Base Shrinks, The Model Enters A Tension Zone.

Now, The Question That Truly Divides Opinions Is Objective: In The Sector You Work In, Would The Four-Day Week Increase The Quality Of Deliverables Or Create Difficult Bottlenecks To Solve? And, If You Had To Choose, Would You Prioritize More Free Time Or More Income At The End Of The Month?

Inscreva-se
Notificar de
guest
0 Comentários
Mais recente
Mais antigos Mais votado
Feedbacks
Visualizar todos comentários
Source
Maria Heloisa Barbosa Borges

Falo sobre construção, mineração, minas brasileiras, petróleo e grandes projetos ferroviários e de engenharia civil. Diariamente escrevo sobre curiosidades do mercado brasileiro.

Share in apps
0
Adoraríamos sua opnião sobre esse assunto, comente!x