1. Home
  2. / Legislation and Law
  3. / Tenant Is Not Forced to Swallow Rent: Tenant Law Blocks Increases Above Contract Index, Prevents Landlord From Demanding Hikes and Allows Blocking Abusive Adjustments With Calculation, Formal Notification, and Evidence
Reading time 5 min of reading Comments 16 comments

Tenant Is Not Forced to Swallow Rent: Tenant Law Blocks Increases Above Contract Index, Prevents Landlord From Demanding Hikes and Allows Blocking Abusive Adjustments With Calculation, Formal Notification, and Evidence

Published on 25/12/2025 at 18:56
Inquilino pode recusar reajuste abusivo de aluguel segundo a Lei do Inquilinato, com contrato, cálculo oficial e prova para barrar aumento irregular.
Inquilino pode recusar reajuste abusivo de aluguel segundo a Lei do Inquilinato, com contrato, cálculo oficial e prova para barrar aumento irregular.
  • Reação
  • Reação
  • Reação
  • Reação
  • Reação
  • Reação
204 pessoas reagiram a isso.
Reagir ao artigo

Based on the Tenancy Law, the tenant can refuse rent increases above the index provided in the contract, demand correct calculations, formalize disagreements through extrajudicial notification, and seek support from Procon-MG or the justice system to block abusive increases and preserve the family budget without fear of retaliation.

A new law announced in Minas Gerais reinforced the protection of the tenant by ensuring that they cannot be evicted while the property sale action is underway. In the same context of rental disputes, the legal limit for adjustments and how far the owner can go without violating the legislation returns to the center of the debate.

Since 1991, the Tenancy Law, created by Law No. 8.245/1991, determines that the rent can only be automatically adjusted by the index provided in the contract, without any hidden extra increases. The recent case of Mônica, who avoided an increase of nearly 25 percent, demonstrates in practice how the tenant can use the law, correct calculations, and the right documentation to block abuses before they destroy their budget.

What the Tenancy Law Really Allows for Rent Adjustment

In practice, annual adjustments only serve to correct the rent for inflation, nothing more.

The Tenancy Law authorizes this automatic adjustment once a year, based on Article 18, limited to the index that was chosen and placed in the contract.

If the contract provides for IPCA, IGP-M, INPC, or another permitted index, the owner can only apply the percentage that this index accumulated during the period.

Any attempt to apply a higher percentage violates the agreement and exceeds the inflationary correction, opening space for contestation by the tenant.

On the other hand, rent review is another scenario. It is not automatic, does not occur every year, and cannot be mixed with the adjustment.

The review of the amount can only happen after three years of the contract, requires technical proof or an agreement between the parties, and cannot be pushed within the annual adjustment as if it were mere correction.

Adjustment Is Not a Free Rent Increase for the Tenant

The rental contract is the tenant’s main shield. It is in this document that the rules for correction and the limits of what the property owner can require are defined.

Even if some clauses seem to allow for free increases, the law invalidates any provision that tries to remove the tenant’s protection.

Article 45 of the Tenancy Law renders null and void any clauses that attempt to bypass this protection.

This means that even if the contract includes vague expressions allowing increases “according to the market” within the annual adjustment, such provisions cannot be used to overrule the index agreed upon with the tenant.

Annual adjustment is inflationary correction. Real rent increases are a different negotiation.

If the owner wants to raise the amount beyond the index, they need a formal written agreement or a revision action after three years, based on concrete evidence of the property’s appreciation.

Different Indices, Different Surprises for the Tenant

A large part of the conflicts arises from the choice of index. The IGP-M is known for its high volatility, as it is directly impacted by the dollar and wholesale prices.

In some years, this resulted in very high adjustments, while the tenant’s income practically remained unchanged.

On the other hand, the IPCA is now the preferred index in many residential contracts because it follows the consumer’s cost of living and tends to be more stable.

The INPC also frequently appears, especially in negotiations tied to family income.

Therefore, understanding which index was agreed upon is the first step for the tenant to know whether the adjustment is correct or not.

When the owner applies a percentage that does not correspond to the contract’s index, rounds up, or uses only “market value” as an argument, there is clear ground for the tenant to contest technically.

Can an Increase Above the Index Be Imposed by the Owner?

The answer is straightforward: it cannot. Any increase above the index provided in the contract is not a simple adjustment; it is a real rent increase.

This increase can only occur if there is a formal agreement between the parties or a revision action after three years of validity.

Arguments like “everyone is charging more in the region” or “the property has appreciated” are not sufficient on their own.

Without technical proof, without substantiated evaluation, and without respecting the minimum time frame, this becomes mere pressure for the tenant to accept a value greater than what is permitted.

Even in contracts with broad clauses, Article 45 of Law 8.245/1991 prevents these provisions from removing the tenant’s protection.

The annual correction cannot be used as a shortcut to force the early appreciation of the rent.

Step by Step for the Tenant to Contest Abusive Adjustments

When the owner announces an adjustment that seems higher than the index, the tenant gains strength when acting technically and documenting everything.

The less emotion and more documentation, the more secure the defense becomes.

The practical steps are:

  • Official Calculation: use the Central Bank’s Citizen Calculator to determine the correct adjustment based on the contract’s index and the exact period.
  • Extrajudicial Notification: send a formal, written communication to the owner informing them of the refusal of the abusive increase, citing the agreed index, the contract, and Law 8.245/1991.
  • Institutional Support: seek guidance and mediation at Procon-MG or file a lawsuit to recognize the abuse and prevent undue charges or threats of eviction.

Without an official calculation, documentation, and notification, the tenant loses strength to contest later.

Keeping the contract, proof of payment, and conversations about adjustments is essential for building a solid defense if the discussion goes to court.

Mônica’s Case: How Information Saved the Budget

The story of Mônica, a tenant in Minas Gerais, illustrates the direct effect of information. Faced with an increase of almost 25 percent, she did not accept the new amount immediately.

Instead, she checked the index provided in the contract, looked for the official IPCA, did the calculations, and compared it with the number proposed by the owner.

With the data in hand, Mônica responded firmly and documentedly, showing the correct percentage and making it clear that she would only accept the adjustment within the official index.

With the combination of law, calculation, and clear posture, she managed to block the abusive increase and preserve her family’s financial balance.

The final message for tenants is simple: silencing in the face of irregular increases can consolidate unfair values for a long time.

Reviewing the contract, checking the index, calculating the adjustment, and formalizing the disagreement are essential steps to protect the budget and the right to housing.

And you, as a tenant, have you checked if the last adjustment of your rent strictly followed the index provided in your contract?

Inscreva-se
Notificar de
guest
16 Comentários
Mais recente
Mais antigos Mais votado
Feedbacks
Visualizar todos comentários
Aline Jaques costa
Aline Jaques costa
31/12/2025 17:07

Eu questionei e fui ameaçada de pedir o imóvel.Nunca atrasei e o pior de tudo que quando aluguei o imóvel era com garagem e além do reajuste abusivo que foi o dobro da taxa que estava no contrato.Recebi mensagem pelo WhatsApp falei o quanto eu poderia pagar que ja era acima do valor e se aceitasse tudo bem.
Senão eu iria acionar advogado.
No dia da renovação do contrato a proprietária falou que não iria mais aumentar tanto o aluguel..falei pra ela só cumprir com a lei pois moro há dez anos e nunca atrasei pagto.

Alessandro
Alessandro
30/12/2025 14:17

Estado se metendo onde não deveria. Se não concorda com o reajuste ao término do contrato, procura outro lugar para morar e devolve o imóvel para o proprietário

Pedro Favorito
Pedro Favorito
28/12/2025 15:03

Procon? Hahahahahahaha ja li besteira, mas procurar Procon pra pedir ajuda sobre reajuste de aluguel é de doer na alma. Pelo amor de Deus, quem tem escrito essas matérias? GPT?

Maria Heloisa Barbosa Borges

Falo sobre construção, mineração, minas brasileiras, petróleo e grandes projetos ferroviários e de engenharia civil. Diariamente escrevo sobre curiosidades do mercado brasileiro.

Share in apps
16
0
Adoraríamos sua opnião sobre esse assunto, comente!x