Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
11 comments 
In A Controversial Articulation, Brazilian Judges Managed To Prevent Cuts To Super Salaries After Threats Of Mass Retirement. Congress Flexibilized The Original PEC Of The Government, Allowing The Maintenance Of Payments Above The Constitutional Ceiling.
In A Move That Stirred The Backrooms Of The Legislative Power And Provoked Heated Discussions, Brazilian Judges And Prosecutors Intensely Pressured To Avoid Cuts To The So-Called Super Salaries.
The Fear Of Losing These Financial Advantages Led To Drastic Strategies, Including Threats Of Mass Retirement, Generating A Stalemate That Mobilized The National Congress And Resulted In A Surprising Flexibilization Of The Rules Proposed By The Government.
According To Legislative Sources, The Result Was The Approval Of Changes That Leave Loopholes For Maintaining Payments Above The Constitutional Ceiling.
-
China alone accounts for 70% of trade within the BRICS, while Brazil establishes itself as an essential supplier of food and minerals: understand how the group, which already represents nearly 40% of the world’s GDP, is changing the game.
-
Starting in May, those who do not have registered biometrics will not be able to apply for Bolsa Família, sickness benefits, or unemployment insurance: understand the new rule that changes access to benefits for millions of Brazilians.
-
A new law being voted on in Brazil proposes a minimum fare of R$ 10 per trip and R$ 2.50 per kilometer for Uber and 99 drivers, and promises to ensure they earn as well as taxi drivers did during the golden age of taxis in the country.
-
Bauer Group collapses after failed judicial recovery: 25 years, 800 vehicles, and a network of gas stations leave a debt of R$ 50 million and 100 layoffs, exposing costs, tight margins, and expensive credit in Brazil.
But How Did This Happen? And What Does This Decision Mean For The Future Of Public Finances And The Justice System In The Country? Check Out The Details Of This Controversy.
The Flexibilization Approved By Congress
The Government’s Initial Proposal, Presented In A Proposed Amendment To The Constitution (PEC), Provided For Clear Restrictions On Super Salaries.
The Text Stipulated That Only Compensation Funds Provided For In Supplementary Law Could Exceed The Constitutional Ceiling, Set At R$ 44 Thousand, Equivalent To The Salary Of A Minister Of The Supreme Federal Court (STF).
However, The National Congress Altered The Wording To Allow Ordinary Laws, Which Require A Lower Quorum For Approval, To Also Regulate These Payments.
According To Experts, This Makes It Easier To Maintain The “Additions” That Inflate The Salaries Of Justice Officials.
Another Controversial Measure Adopted Was The Guarantee That, Until New Laws Are Approved, The Existing Super Salaries Would Continue To Be Paid Normally. In Other Words, The Status Quo Was Preserved.
Lobby And Pressure From Categories
Since The Beginning Of December 2024, Judges And Prosecutors Intensified Their Articulations In Congress To Block The Portion Of The Fiscal Package That Could Limit Their Earnings.
Representative Entities Of These Categories Released Public Statements Warning Of The Risk Of A “Mass Exodus” Of Professionals, In Case The PEC Was Approved In Its Original Form.
These Entities Stated That About 40% Of The Members Of The Judiciary And The Public Ministry Could Retire If There Were Cuts To The Super Salaries.
The Presidents Of Courts Warned That This Mass Retirement Would Lead To A Congestion Of Cases And A Significant Increase In The Slowness Of The Brazilian Justice System.
Financial Impact And Questioning
Despite The Arguments Presented By The Judges, Interlocutors Of The Minister Of Finance, Fernando Haddad, Pointed Out That The Narrative Of A Negative Impact On Public Finances Is Deceptive.
According To Them, Future Costs With Retirements And New Contests Would Be Offset By The Savings Generated By Limiting Payments Above The Ceiling.
Data From The Transparency Brazil Report Reinforces The Magnitude Of The Problem. In 2023, The Allowances And Bonuses Paid Above The Constitutional Ceiling Cost R$ 4.4 Billion To The Public Coffers.
According To The Survey, Nearly 70% Of The 13.2 Thousand Brazilian Judges And Higher Court Judges Received Between R$ 100 Thousand And R$ 499 Thousand Above The Ceiling.
These Figures Contrast With The Reality Of Most Brazilian Workers And Raise Debates About Justice And Equity.
The Future Of Super Salaries
The Congress’s Decision To Flexibilize The Rules For Super Salaries Reveals The Strength Of The Lobby Of Organized Categories, Especially When Threats Of Strikes Or Retirements Are Put On The Table.
For Many Analysts, This Flexibilization Compromises The Objectives Of Fiscal Adjustment And Reinforces Inequalities In The Public Sector.
The Maintenance Of Payments Above The Ceiling Also Raises Questions About The Credibility Of The Justice System.
How To Trust A Judiciary That Defends Its Own Interests To The Detriment Of The Balance Of Public Finances?
Do You Believe That The Maintenance Of Super Salaries Is Justifiable In The Face Of Threats Of Mass Retirement? Or Should Fiscal Adjustment Be An Absolute Priority? Comment Below!
Mas.. isso não seria terrorismo, formação de quadrilha?
Aí está, melhor então deixar a população à míngua! Isso não é crime??
Esses **** aposentando em massa não faria diferença nenhuma para a população, haja vista que não produzem o suficiente nem para justificar o teto de salário. É tudo blefe, inclusive, porque defendem o aumento do tempo da aposentadoria compulsória de 75 para 80 anos. Dificilmente aposentam antes dos 75 anos, para usufruírem ao máximo as benesses do serviço público, tais como a manutenção de familiares em funções públicas sem concursos, sempre com as maiores gratificações.
A distorção entre salário de juiz e profissional liberal, que na Europa se equivalem, chega a vergonhosa aqui no Brasil.
Portanto, além de blefe, mais parece desespero de uma classe de apaniguados, em detrimento das demais carreiras do funcionalismo público.
O mesmo comportamento é observado no ministério público.
Basta dizer que esses canalhas reativaram apenas para suas categorias o pagamento de anuenios, que foram extintos do serviço público federal há mais de 20 anos, com direito a pagamento retroativo.
Os orçamentos do judiciário e ministério público estão sendo consumidos em grande medida por esses **** que não largam o osso nem a **** e trabalho que é bom a gente percebe pela lentidão cada vez mais crônica da prestação dos serviços.
Junto com os militares, são um peso morto que afunda o país.