1. Home
  2. / Interesting facts
  3. / Even After Being “Closed,” Landfills Continue to Release Methane for Up to 50 Years, Turning Mountains of Trash into Persistent Sources of Greenhouse Gases That Rival Entire Industrial Sectors
Reading time 4 min of reading Comments 3 comments

Even After Being “Closed,” Landfills Continue to Release Methane for Up to 50 Years, Turning Mountains of Trash into Persistent Sources of Greenhouse Gases That Rival Entire Industrial Sectors

Written by Débora Araújo
Published on 06/02/2026 at 11:16
Updated on 06/02/2026 at 11:21
Mesmo após serem “fechados”, aterros sanitários seguem liberando metano por até 50 anos, transformando montanhas de lixo em fontes persistentes de gases de efeito estufa que já rivalizam com setores industriais inteiros
Mesmo após serem “fechados”, aterros sanitários seguem liberando metano por até 50 anos, transformando montanhas de lixo em fontes persistentes de gases de efeito estufa que já rivalizam com setores industriais inteiros
  • Reação
  • Reação
  • Reação
  • Reação
5 pessoas reagiram a isso.
Reagir ao artigo

Even After Closure, Landfills Continue to Emit Methane for Decades. Understand Why Urban Waste Became One of the Largest Invisible Sources of Greenhouse Gases.

When a landfill is officially closed, the common perception is that the environmental problem ends there. The reality is quite different. According to technical assessments consolidated by the IPCC, the US EPA, and the Global Methane Initiative, “sealed” landfills continue to release methane (CH₄) for 30 to 50 years — and in some cases, for even longer periods.

This occurs because the buried waste does not stop decomposing when the landfill closes. On the contrary, organic waste continues to be slowly degraded by microorganisms in low-oxygen environments, exactly the ideal conditions for methane production.

Why Methane Is So Critical to the Climate

Methane is a greenhouse gas that is much more potent than carbon dioxide in the short term. According to the IPCC, its global warming potential is about 84 times greater than that of CO₂ over a 20-year horizon. This means that small amounts of methane have a disproportionate climate impact.

YouTube Video

In national emission inventories, this factor weighs heavily. In several countries, the urban solid waste sector already appears among the top individual sources of methane, surpassing or rivaling specific industrial segments such as cement, steelmaking, or heavy chemicals.

Sealed Landfills Still “Breathe”

Even after closure, the mass of buried waste operates as an underground biological reactor. Food scraps, paper, wood, fabrics, and other organic materials undergo a process called anaerobic digestion, which occurs in three main stages:

  • Hydrolysis and Acidogenesis, in which complex molecules break down;
  • Acetogenesis, producing intermediate compounds;
  • Methanogenesis, the phase in which bacteria produce methane and carbon dioxide.

This process can last for decades because the waste is compacted, moisture levels vary, and access to oxygen is minimal. In many old landfills, especially those built before modern environmental engineering standards, gas control is limited or non-existent.

When Waste Rivals Industry

Data compiled by the EPA and European environmental agencies show that in highly urbanized countries, landfills represent the single largest source of human-origin methane. In the United States, for example, landfills have led national CH₄ emissions for years. In the European Union, the waste sector competes with intensive agriculture for prominence.

In Brazil, inventories from the environmental sector indicate that urban waste accounts for a significant share of methane emissions, especially in metropolitan areas where large landfills operated for decades before being closed or replaced.

Gas Capture: Partial, Not Definitive Solution

Modern engineering anticipates systems for capturing and burning or utilizing biogas. Perforated pipes drain the gas generated within the landfill, reducing direct leaks into the atmosphere. In some cases, this gas is used to generate electricity. However, technical reports indicate that:

  • No system captures 100% of the generated methane;
  • Efficiency decreases as the landfill ages;
  • Old landfills were often not designed for this technology.

As a result, a significant fraction of methane continues to escape diffusely through cracks, cover failures, or poorly sealed areas.

The Long-Term Climate Liability

One of the most critical points highlighted by the IPCC is that landfills create an intergenerational climate liability. Cities that closed dumps and landfills decades ago still deal with emissions today — and will continue to do so in the future.

YouTube Video

This creates a paradox: public policies celebrate the closure of landfills while emissions continue to occur silently, off the radar of public debate. The environmental cost, however, remains active.

Why This Problem Is So Hard to Eliminate

There are three main obstacles to eliminating methane emissions from landfills:

  1. Accumulated Volume of Waste: decades of disposal have generated mountains of waste that cannot simply be removed.
  2. Technical Limitations: capture systems have limited efficiency and require ongoing maintenance.
  3. Financial Cost: monitoring and mitigating emissions for 30 to 50 years poses a high cost for municipalities.

Therefore, experts point out that the real solution lies less in treating the closed landfill and more in the reduction of organic waste sent to land, through composting, biodigestion, and structural changes in waste management.

An Invisible Yet Crucial Problem

Landfills are often seen as a closed chapter in urban history. In practice, they remain active, emitting highly impactful gases for the global climate. By rivaling entire industrial sectors in emissions, urban waste makes it clear that the climate challenge lies not only in smokestacks and factories but also underground, where mountains of waste continue to “breathe” methane silently for decades.

This invisible liability helps explain why combating global warming requires looking beyond the obvious sources — and directly confronting the environmental legacy left by the traditional waste disposal model in cities.

Inscreva-se
Notificar de
guest
3 Comentários
Mais recente
Mais antigos Mais votado
Feedbacks
Visualizar todos comentários
Maria da Glória de Amorim
Maria da Glória de Amorim
10/02/2026 14:38

Ir misturando terra nesse lixo, impede saída de gazes e vai o transformando em excelente adubo orgânico.

Hermes garcia filho
Hermes garcia filho
Em resposta a  Maria da Glória de Amorim
12/02/2026 12:45

Mas e o chorume? O líquido que vem ee baterias e outros líquidos nocivos?

Maria da Glória de Amorim
Maria da Glória de Amorim
10/02/2026 14:35

Porque não transformar esse lixo orgânico em adubo ?

Source
Débora Araújo

Débora Araújo é redatora no Click Petróleo e Gás, com mais de dois anos de experiência em produção de conteúdo e mais de mil matérias publicadas sobre tecnologia, mercado de trabalho, geopolítica, indústria, construção, curiosidades e outros temas. Seu foco é produzir conteúdos acessíveis, bem apurados e de interesse coletivo. Sugestões de pauta, correções ou mensagens podem ser enviadas para contato.deboraaraujo.news@gmail.com

Share in apps
3
0
Adoraríamos sua opnião sobre esse assunto, comente!x