Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
1 comment 
SUVs Compared: Nissan Kicks and Fiat Fastback Offer Versatile Options for Different Driver Profiles
Brazilian families continue to show great interest in SUVs, prioritizing models that offer space, good equipment levels, and efficiency. Within this segment, the Nissan Kicks and Fiat Fastback emerge as two standout options. Both are among the best-selling SUVs in the market, but each has distinct characteristics that may appeal to different buyer profiles. Let’s explore the advantages of each model to help you make the best choice, according to newsautomotivas.
Price and Cost-Effectiveness: Kicks Has the Advantage
The Nissan Kicks remains competitive in the market thanks to its attractive price. The base version, Kicks Active, starts at R$ 114,190, rising to R$ 116,190 with the addition of the multimedia system. The most complete version, Kicks Exclusive Pack Tech, goes up to R$ 155,990. In contrast, the Fiat Fastback starts at R$ 119,990 for the 1.0 Turbo CVT version and can reach R$ 165,990 for the Abarth 1.3 Turbo AT version.
In the price comparison between mid-range versions, such as the Kicks Sense (R$ 118,290) and the Fastback 1.0 Turbo (R$ 119,990), the Fastback offers more equipment, such as 17-inch wheels, LED headlights, and parking sensors, while the Kicks stands out in safety items, such as curtain airbags and twilight sensors.
-
Engineers propose a fourth traffic light for intersections – the change promises to affect crossings, queues, and waiting times.
-
Chevrolet Suburban Z71 lands in Brazil with a V8 engine, off-road design, air suspension, seven seats, and colossal size, a rare version imported for around R$ 1.3 million with luxury and exclusivity.
-
The Chevrolet Onix 1.0 turbo achieves 17.7 km per liter on the highway and ranks among the three most economical cars in Brazil in 2026, alongside two more expensive Toyota hybrids available at dealerships.
-
Little sister of the Hilux: Toyota launches Land Cruiser FJ with 4 radical versions, 2.7 engine with 166 hp and 4×4 traction with locking.
Performance and Economy: Fastback Impresses
In terms of performance, the Fiat Fastback has the advantage, especially in versions with a turbo engine. The basic model comes with a 1.0 turbo engine with 130 hp, while the more advanced versions offer a 1.3 turbo engine with 185 hp. The Nissan Kicks, on the other hand, still features a 1.6 naturally aspirated engine with 113 hp, which, although reliable, does not deliver the same performance as its rival.
The Fastback also excels in fuel consumption, especially in the 1.0 Turbo version, which is more efficient compared to the Kicks’s naturally aspirated engine. However, it is worth noting that the Kicks, despite its modest performance, offers a comfortable and safe driving experience, with an engine that is well-suited for urban use.
Interior Space and Comfort: Fastback Excels
When it comes to space, the Fiat Fastback stands out, especially in the trunk, which offers 516 liters compared to the Kicks’s 432 liters. Although the Kicks has a slightly higher height and provides greater rear passenger comfort in terms of legroom, the Fastback compensates with a rear air conditioning vent and more complete lighting for second-row occupants.
Which Is the Best for You?
The Nissan Kicks stands out as a more economical choice, both in purchase price and maintenance costs, in addition to being the best-selling model in the Brazilian market. Meanwhile, the Fiat Fastback offers a more advanced technology and performance package, as well as more generous interior space, especially for those traveling with luggage.
In the end, the choice between Nissan Kicks and Fiat Fastback will depend on your priorities: if you seek economy and reliability, the Kicks is an excellent option. But if your focus is on technology, performance, and space, the Fastback may be the ideal SUV for you.
Technical Specifications
| Specifications | Nissan Kicks 2024 | Fiat Fastback 2024 |
| Engine | 1.6 Flex, 4 cylinders, 16V | 1.3 Turbo Flex, 4 cylinders, 16V |
| Power | 114 hp (gasoline and ethanol) | 185 hp (ethanol) / 180 hp (gasoline) |
| Torque | 15.5 kgfm | 27.5 kgfm |
| Transmission | Automatic CVT | 6-speed Automatic |
| Traction | Front | Front |
| Consumption (city/highway) | 11.4 / 13.7 km/l (gasoline) | 10.4 / 12.9 km/l (gasoline) |
| Trunk Capacity | 432 liters | 516 liters |
| Dimensions (LxWxH) | 4,295 mm x 1,760 mm x 1,590 mm | 4,427 mm x 1,774 mm x 1,540 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,620 mm | 2,533 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,142 kg | 1,382 kg |
| Front Suspension | Independent McPherson-type | Independent McPherson-type |
| Rear Suspension | Twist beam with stabilizer bar | Twist beam with stabilizer bar |
| Brakes | Ventilated discs (front) / Drum (rear) | Ventilated discs (front and rear) |
| Starting Price | R$ 125,000.00 (estimated) | R$ 144,990.00 (estimated) |
Which of these SUVs is your favorite? Let us know in the comments and feel free to share the best stories you’ve experienced behind the wheel of one of them! ✨
Oque me atraiu foi além do design, o porta malas do Fastback é aquilo que preciso!!!