Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
4 min of reading 
0 comments 
Experts, Entities, and Parliamentarians Explain Why There Is No General Obligation, but There Is Requirement Whenever the Activity Presents Real Risk to the Worker
The discussion about the possible obligation of using helmets for rural workers has gained significant attention in recent months, driven by divergent interpretations and the rapid circulation of information on social media.
Amid the noise, what is observed is the need to separate facts from rumors. There is currently no new law that determines the automatic replacement of hats by helmets in all field activities.
What exists are already consolidated rules that condition the requirement for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to the existence of real risk to the physical integrity of the worker.
-
The sugar-energy sector advances with agricultural technology, but agricultural productivity still raises concerns.
-
The eggshell that almost everyone throws away is made up of about 95% calcium carbonate and can help enrich the soil when crushed, slowly releasing nutrients and being reused in home gardens and vegetable patches.
-
This farm in the United States does not use sunlight, does not use soil, and produces 500 times more food per square meter than traditional agriculture: the secret lies in 42,000 LEDs, hydroponics, and a system that recycles even the heat from the lamps.
-
The water that almost everyone throws away after cooking potatoes carries nutrients released during the preparation and can be reused to help in the development of plants when used correctly at the base of gardens and pots, at no additional cost and without changing the routine.
This understanding is aligned with what had already been published by the Compre Rural portal, reinforcing the importance of a technical and responsible reading of the norms that directly impact producers, managers, and workers.
An Isolated Case That Caused Confusion
The controversy began after an accident on a rural property in Tocantins. At the time, a labor auditor fined the owner for the absence of PPE, leading part of the public to interpret the episode as a national change in the rules.
However, there has been no recent change in the legislation on the subject. NR-31 was published in 2005 and last updated in March 2024, without any inclusion establishing a generalized obligation for helmet use in activities such as grazing.
Faeg Clarifies When the Helmet Is Required
To clarify the scenario, the Federation of Agriculture and Livestock of Goiás (Faeg) publicly positioned itself.
The legal advisor of the entity, Rosirene Curado, explained that the existing safety norms in rural work continue to apply.
According to her, helmet use was already foreseen before, but only in specific situations. “The use of protective helmets is already foreseen, but only when there is a real risk of falling objects or impact on the worker’s head.”
Among the examples cited are activities in silos, construction, renovations, and other tasks with potential for accidents.
Rosirene also emphasized that this requirement is part of the technical risk analysis carried out within the Risk Management Program of the farm.
Difference Between Safety Helmet and Traffic Helmet
Another point that caused confusion is the association between the work safety helmet and the traffic helmet.
On properties where grazing occurs with motorcycles, the use of a helmet is mandatory under traffic rules, not by rural labor legislation.
The advisor was emphatic in clarifying: “Helmets will be required when the worker is in a silo, under construction, where there is a risk of falling objects. This is already foreseen. Now, going out for grazing and having to wear a construction helmet? No.”
Debate Reaches Congress
The topic has also moved into the political arena. Deputy Rodolfo Nogueira presented a Legislative Decree Proposal to suspend the effects of Ordinance No. 104/2026 from the Ministry of Labor.
In the parliamentary view, the ordinance could broaden the scope of interpretation for auditors, creating legal uncertainty and opening space for fines even in traditional rural labor situations.
He also criticized the possible “revenue-generating nature of the measure,” stating that it could strengthen the so-called “fine industry” at a time of economic pressure on the producer.
Specialist Reinforces Focus on Safety
The safety engineer and Senar instructor, Carolina Melo Prudente, highlights that the norm does not prohibit the use of hats. The central point is that it does not replace the helmet when there is risk.
“In these situations, the safety helmet must be used and, if not, there may be fines and liability for the employer.”
For her, the discussion needs to be directed towards prevention. “It is not just about ‘replacing the hat with a helmet’ out of stubbornness or to end tradition. It is about looking at the real risk of the activity and thinking about safety.”
Carolina recalls that falls from horses can occur due to scares, uneven terrain, or slips, affecting even experienced workers.
“In a fall, the head is one of the most vulnerable parts, and the helmet helps absorb impact and reduce the severity of potential trauma.”
The technical analysis coincides with what Compre Rural published earlier. When there is risk to physical integrity, tradition does not outweigh the law.
NR-31 states that the helmet becomes mandatory whenever there is a risk of head injury, such as in the handling of large animals, in pens, elevated structures, or when operating machinery.
In these situations, the worker will have to replace the hat with a helmet, and noncompliance may result in fines, penalties, and employer liability.
Even when the worker refuses to use the equipment, legal responsibility remains with the farm.
Cultural Resistance and Gradual Change
Technical reports indicate that inspections have intensified following fatal accidents involving workers, including a case in Tocantins, where a worker died after falling from a horse.
These episodes reinforce the preventive nature of helmets, which can reduce cranial trauma, facial fractures, and severe lacerations.
Despite this, cultural resistance remains an obstacle. Many older workers are accustomed to hats from the beginning of their lives in the field, and some show difficulty adapting to new requirements.
Experts argue that the way forward involves training, awareness, and a gradual change of mindset, reconciling tradition, compliance with the law, and protection of life.
With information from Compre Rural.
-
-
-
5 pessoas reagiram a isso.