Labor Court Ruling Recognized That the Nursing Technician Had Rights of the Mother and Child Violated, Increasing Compensation from R$ 10,000 to R$ 30,000
A Nursing Technician from Porto Alegre (RS) will be compensated R$ 30,000 after the company she worked for refused to grant the breastfeeding breaks provided by law. The decision was confirmed by the 8th panel of the Regional Labor Court of the 4th region, which considered the case a violation of the rights of the mother and the baby.
The compensation, which had initially been set at R$ 10,000, was increased by the judges in light of the recognition that the conduct of the company represented not only disrespect for labor legislation but also a direct impact on the physical, emotional health and dignity of the worker and her child.
The Right to Breastfeeding Breaks
Brazilian legislation guarantees that women in the breastfeeding phase have two breaks of 30 minutes per work shift until the child turns six months old.
-
The Chamber opens a debate on driver’s licenses at 16 years old as part of a reform that includes around 270 proposals to change the Brazilian Traffic Code and may redesign rules for licensing, enforcement, and circulation in the country.
-
The new Civil Code could revolutionize marriages in Brazil with “express divorce” and changes that could exclude spouses from inheritance.
-
Banco do Brasil sues famous influencer for million-dollar debt and intensifies debate on delinquency, risks of seizure, and direct impact on Gkay’s credibility.
-
The Senate approves a bill that criminalizes misogyny, hatred, or aversion towards women, and includes the crime in the Racism Law with a penalty of up to 5 years.
In the professional’s case, this right was ignored by the health service company, even after her return from maternity leave.
In addition to the R$ 30,000 compensation for moral damages, the worker will receive retroactive amounts corresponding to the breaks not granted, plus an additional 50%, reinforcing the reparatory nature of the decision.
This measure seeks to ensure that employers understand the obligation to respect specific maternity rights.
Company’s Arguments and Judicial Decision
The company claimed that the technician had taken vacation right after maternity leave and subsequently resigned, attempting to justify the denial of breaks.
However, Judge Carolina Cauduro Dias de Paiva, from the 2nd Labor Court of Porto Alegre, rejected the defense based on documents and evidence presented in the case.
For the judge, the company’s refusal frustrated both the child’s right to be nourished with breast milk and the mother’s right to experience this moment of connection.
The decision was upheld by TRT-4, which also increased the amount of the compensation as a way to discourage similar practices.
The Importance of Gender Analysis in the Case
The rapporteur of the ruling, Judge Marcelo José Ferlin D’Ambroso, highlighted the need to evaluate the situation from a gender perspective.
He stated that the lack of conditions for breastfeeding represented a blatant disrespect for the human rights of the worker, violating basic principles of decent work.
According to the magistrate, the lack of breaks for breastfeeding caused presumed suffering and distress, affecting not only the professional but also the baby.
This analysis reinforces that labor decisions must consider specific impacts on women in maternity situations.
Impacts on the Labor Market
The company’s condemnation signals to the labor market the importance of ensuring adequate conditions for mothers during breastfeeding periods.
Experts believe that the TRT-4 decision strengthens case law in favor of protecting the rights of women and children, especially in sectors like health, where exhausting shifts often hinder the application of the law.
At the same time, it reinforces that employer negligence regarding basic rights can result in high compensation and damage to the company’s image, increasing pressure for compliance with labor standards.
The case of the Nursing Technician who will be compensated R$ 30,000 illustrates how the Justice system has been strengthening the protection of maternity rights in the workplace.
The decision serves as a warning for employers and encouragement for workers facing similar situations.
Do you think the fine was enough to compensate for the damages suffered? Do Brazilian companies truly respect the rights of working mothers? Share your opinion in the comments — your experience could enrich this debate.

Este valor de indenização e baixíssimo pelo direito em que esta mãezinha tem
O valor teria que ser una ate de 3 salários mínimos ate a criança completa 12 anos porque esta empresa vai dispensa esta trabalhadora sem chance de ter condições financeiras psra pagar alguém para cuidar da criança para ela voltar ao mercado de trabalho e empresas nenhuma quer da emprego a mulher que tenha filhos pequenos NAGISTRADO FAÇA VALE ESTE A HONRA DESTA MAMAEZINHA