Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
4 min of reading 
3 comments 
Minas Gerais Court Rejects Compensation Claim and Validates Sanctions Based on Condominium Convention That Prohibits Transforming Residential Unit into Commercial Point.
The 18th Civil Chamber of the Court of Justice of Minas Gerais upheld the fines imposed on a tenant in Belo Horizonte accused of converting a residential apartment into a commercial point, in violation of the condominium convention. The panel confirmed that residential use must prevail when expressly provided for in the internal regulations, even in the face of claims of persecution and discrimination.
According to Conjur, the resident sought to annul the penalties and receive compensation for moral and material damages, but the court understood that the charges were regular and supported by assembly deliberation, as well as evidential elements indicating the property’s use for commercial purposes.
What the TJ-MG Decided and Why It Matters
The decision fully confirmed the first-instance ruling, which had already considered the fines valid.
-
The Senate approves a bill that criminalizes misogyny, hatred, or aversion towards women, and includes the crime in the Racism Law with a penalty of up to 5 years.
-
Chamber Approves Bill That Allows Pepper Spray for Women Over 16 and Imposes Strict Rules for Purchase, Possession, and Use as Self-Defense
-
Chamber Approves Law to Combat Leucaena, Fast-Growing Plant That Dominates Land and Threatens Native Species in Various Regions of the Country
-
Asset Division: Know What Cannot Be Divided in Case of Divorce
For the court, the convention that prohibits commercial, industrial, or professional activities, even if occasional, in residential units is clear and effective.
The rapporteur, Judge Luís Eduardo Alves Pifano, emphasized that there was no punitive abuse, but rather the application of sanctions provided for and legitimized in the assembly.
Judges João Câncio and Sérgio André da Fonseca Xavier joined the vote in a unanimous decision.
What the Tenant Said and What Weighed Against His Version
The tenant alleged a lack of formal notification, persecution by the manager, and discrimination against transgender residents.
He also argued that the supposed evidence would merely be records from the concierge, without confirmation that visitors were clients. However, the evidential set was deemed sufficient.
According to Conjur, the judge of origin had already pointed out the regularity of the notifications and the breach of rules regarding hours and use of the unit, which was endorsed by the TJ-MG upon verifying that the penalties followed the internal regulations.
Evidence, Convention, and the Court’s Stance
The rapporteur highlighted witness evidence and social media records indicating the exploitation of sexual programs in the unit, as well as elevated activity during nighttime and dawn, incompatible with residential use.
This set formed a coherent narrative of using the property as a commercial point, contradicting the convention.
For the court, the protection of residential function and the condominium community justifies maintaining sanctions when the conduct of a unit owner or tenant violates rules approved by others.
The interpretation prioritizes security, peace, and health, values that the convention seeks to safeguard.
What Is Decided About Compensation and Accusations of Persecution
The compensation request was denied. The panel understood that no unlawful act committed by the condominium was proven, but rather the regular exercise of a right provided for in the convention and supported by the assembly.
No excesses or injustices were identified in the manager’s actions and administration.
According to Conjur, the court did not recognize discrimination in this case, as the measures adopted stemmed from violations of the rules of use of the unit and not from the personal characteristics of the residents.
Practical Effects for Condominiums and Residents
For condominiums, the decision reinforces that clear and well-publicized conventions are effective instruments to prevent the transformation of residential properties into commercial points.
The documentation of occurrences, regular notifications, and assembly deliberations form the evidential tripod that supports the imposition of fines.
For residents and tenants, the message is clear: using the unit outside its intended purpose incurs sanctions.
In future disputes, coherence between evidence, conventions, and internal rites is likely to be decisive, especially when there are reports of commercial activity, client reception, or nighttime routines incompatible with the residential environment.
The TJ-MG’s decision consolidates the understanding that residential use cannot be relaxed to accommodate commercial points when the convention expressly prohibits it.
By validating fines and rejecting compensation, the court reinforces the normative force of internal rules and the obligation to preserve them for the benefit of the condominium community.
Do you agree with the TJ-MG’s position? In your opinion, to what extent can the convention limit the use of the unit when there is economic interest from the resident? Share your experience: in your building, are there similar cases of commercial activities in an apartment? How did the administration address the problem, and what worked best?
Tribunal reconheceu que essa “atividade” é “comércio” (ponto comercial). Agora será possível abrir empresa com CNPJ?
Comércio ilegal.
Infelizmente a milhares de residências também com pontos comerciais no Brasil, o maior problema é a utilização pela ****, aí complica, pois isto é crime, tambem contra os costumes e a moral familiar etc…