Norwegians work an average of 33 hours per week, leave the office at 3 PM, and are now participating in a pilot program for a four-day week with full pay and maintained productivity, a model that raises debate in Brazil and around the world about working hours.
In Brazil, the workweek can reach 44 hours, and many people still take tasks home. In Norway, Norwegians leave the office at 3 PM as a routine, not as an exception. The country’s legislation provides for 40 hours per week, but in practice, the real average of work is around 33 hours. And as if that weren’t enough to provoke envy in those stuck in traffic at 6 PM, the country is now officially testing the four-day week with full salary and no cut in productivity.
The pilot program was launched by 4 Day Week Global, a non-profit organization that encourages the transition to a four-day week worldwide. The test in Norway began at the end of last year and is expected to extend until next summer, with the aim of assessing how the population reacts to the anticipation of the weekend to Thursday afternoon. Norwegians are participating alongside workers from Sweden in a six-month experiment that could change the way the world understands the relationship between hours worked and results delivered.
Why Norwegians already work less than most of the world
The work culture in Norway is built on a principle that sounds almost radical for countries like Brazil: personal life carries equal or greater weight than professional life. Leaving the office at 3 or 4 PM is not laziness or lack of commitment. It is a socially accepted norm respected by employers and colleagues.
-
A legend of Brazilian TV is 75 years old, returned to narrate the World Cup for SBT, and still finds time to manage a farm of over 100 hectares in Rio Grande do Sul where she produces award-winning wines, olive oil, and raises cattle.
-
Family buys mansion destroyed by fire for $1.5 million, faces over 500 days of construction, transforms loss into high-end property, and leaves neighbors in awe.
-
The world consumes 50 billion tons of sand per year and no one is monitoring it: the UN warns that the second most used resource on the planet after water is running out and has even created an international mafia.
-
With a length of 211 meters, a double iron hull, and propulsion by sails, paddles, and a screw propeller simultaneously, the Great Eastern was the largest ship on the planet and ultimately laid the first successful transatlantic telegraph cable.
Norwegians organize their work hours so that tasks are completed efficiently within a shorter period.
With an average of 33 hours per week, Norway ranks among the countries with the shortest working hours in the world and still maintains one of the highest productivities per hour worked.
The logic is simple in theory and difficult in practice: fewer hours in the office require more focus, fewer unnecessary meetings, and a culture that values results over physical presence. For Norwegians, staying late at work is not a sign of dedication. It is a sign that something is not working.
The 100-80-100 model that Norwegians are testing in practice
The pilot program for the four-day week follows the so-called 100-80-100 model, already successfully applied in other countries like Iceland and in experiments like the one conducted in Valencia, Spain.
Workers receive 100% of their salary, work 80% of the hours, and maintain 100% of productivity. The equation seems impossible, but the results accumulated in previous tests show that it works when there is a real reorganization of work processes.
The fact that Norwegians are already accustomed to shorter work hours may favor the results of the pilot program. The transition from 33 hours per week to a four-day week is less drastic than it would be in countries where people work 44 hours or more.
4 Day Week Global relies on positive data observed in previous experiences to bet that Norway could become one of the first countries to officially adopt the model on a large scale.
The data that motivated Norway to test the four-day week
The decision to participate in the pilot program was not motivated solely by ideology. Concrete data indicates a loss of 2.2 million workdays per quarter in Norway, with about 25% of these absences related to exhaustion, burnout, and other work-related issues.
These numbers represent a significant economic cost for companies and for the country’s healthcare system.
In addition to absenteeism, 27% of Norwegian workers say they are considering leaving their jobs to dedicate more time to personal life and family. This data caught the attention of 4 Day Week Global and reinforced the need to test alternatives before dissatisfaction with the current model turns into a talent retention crisis. For Norwegians, working less is not a luxury.
It is a pragmatic response to mental health and productivity indicators that signal that the traditional model has limits.
The inevitable comparison between Norwegians and Brazilians in working hours
While Norwegians debate whether 33 hours per week might be too much, Brazil maintains a legal workweek of up to 44 hours, with frequent overtime and commutes that can add another two or three hours to the actual workday.
The difference is not just numerical. It reflects opposing views on what it means to be productive and on the role of work in a person’s life.
The comparison is not meant to romanticize Norway or diminish Brazil, as the economic, social, and cultural contexts are completely different. But it raises a legitimate question: if Norwegians can maintain high productivity while working less, what prevents other countries from at least testing similar models?
In Brazil, the discussion about working hours is still timid and often confused with a lack of ambition. In Norway, it is treated as a public health and economic competitiveness policy.
What happens if the test with Norwegians succeeds
If the data from the pilot program confirm positive impacts on productivity, mental health, and worker satisfaction, the four-day week could cease to be just a trend and become a real change in the world of work.
Norway, already operating with shorter work hours and having a culture that values the balance between personal and professional life, is in a privileged position to lead this transition.
For Norwegians, the experiment represents the natural continuation of a trajectory that has always prioritized quality of life. For the rest of the world, including Brazil, the outcome could serve as a concrete argument in debates that are still treated as utopia today.
Generation Z, which is already openly questioning the traditional work model, is closely following what happens in Norway. If it works there, the pressure for similar changes in other countries will grow irreversibly.
What do you think: are Norwegians right to test the four-day week, or is working less a luxury that few countries can afford? Would you like to see this model tested in Brazil? Leave your opinion in the comments. Few topics generate as much reaction as the relationship between work, time, and quality of life.

Seja o primeiro a reagir!