Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
6 min of reading 
0 comments 
Geometric marks on ancient walls reveal use of advanced and automated military technology in the Roman world, suggesting that Hellenistic engineers had already mastered continuous firing systems long before the industrial era and reinforcing unprecedented physical evidence in the context of preserved historical battle.
The preserved marks on the northern wall of Pompeii led Italian researchers to argue that the siege commanded by Lucius Cornelius Sulla in 89 BC may have involved a much more sophisticated repeating weapon than previously thought for the ancient world.
The study relates quadrangular and fan-shaped perforations to the possible use of the polybolos, a mechanical dart launcher described in Hellenistic treatises and, until now, without unequivocal material proof in the battlefield.
Marks on the walls of Pompeii and evidence of the Roman siege
The examined area is located between the Porta Vesuvio and the Porta Ercolano, in a section already known for concentrating signs of the Roman attack on the city.
-
The largest deposit of Vale was discovered by accident and today represents almost all the ore produced by the company.
-
The Brazilian Army takes F-5 fighters out of the garage and stars in an air combat with support from the KC-390.
-
In just 3 years, OMODA 5 surpasses 400,000 units and reaches a milestone that takes most cars a decade to achieve.
-
Without cement, without steel, and using only earth and recycled cardboard, engineers have created a construction system that drastically reduces carbon emissions and could change the way houses are built around the world.
There, the team led by Adriana Rossi from the Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, with collaboration from researchers linked to the University of Bologna in previous group work, mapped small cavities that differ from the circular impacts attributed to conventional catapults.
The central point of the research lies in the shape of these damages.
Instead of wide craters associated with the launch of stone projectiles, smaller, square or diamond-shaped perforations appear, distributed at short intervals along a curve.
According to the authors, this radial pattern fits better with the successive firing of metal darts than with the action of archers or the natural wear of stonework.
To test the hypothesis, the group resorted to high-resolution digital surveying, using laser scanning, close-range photogrammetry, and three-dimensional modeling.
This material allowed for the isolation of specific marks, measuring depth, width, and angle of incidence, and from there, virtually reconstructing the ballistic behavior of the projectiles that hit the wall.
The authors argue that the set of evidence points to a repeating firing machine.
The interpretation gained strength when the digital models began to be compared with ancient descriptions of the mechanism preserved by Philo of Byzantium, an engineer and writer from the Hellenistic period, whose work details the operation of a weapon capable of launching several darts in succession.
Polybolos: automatic weapon of ancient Greek engineering
The weapon known as polybolos, or polybolos, is generally attributed to Dionysius of Alexandria, linked to the arsenal of Rhodes in the 3rd century BC.
Its principle was different from the manual bow: the firing depended on a mechanical system with transmission and ammunition feeding elements, designed to maintain the cadence and reduce human interference between one launch and another.
Philo described the equipment as an evolution of the torsion machines used in the ancient Mediterranean.
In the modern reconstructions cited by the researchers, the set involves gears, transmission chain, and an automatic loader, which positions the darts on the firing rail.
This combination helps explain why the marks observed in Pompeii appear so close to each other and with similar orientation.
Still, the study itself works with cautious language.
Instead of announcing an absolute certainty, the authors state that the configuration of the impacts makes it reasonable to raise the hypothesis of the use of an “automatic scorpion,” formulating the identification of the polybolos based on the convergence of archaeological traces, typological comparison, and ancient technical documentation.
Pompeii preserves rare signs of ancient military technology
Pompeii offers a rare context for this type of investigation because the site combines two decisive historical events.
First, the city faced Sulla’s siege during the Social War.
Then, it was buried by the eruption of Vesuvius in 79 AD, which helped preserve urban features and signs of military violence that, in other areas of the Roman world, would tend to disappear due to reforms, erosion, or reuse of structures.
Previous research had already associated the large circular impacts on the walls with the Republican bombardment using stone projectiles.
The recent advance came from the systematic documentation of the smaller cavities, recorded in digital campaigns in 2024 and analyzed in academic articles published in the following years.
This chain allowed for a shift from simple observation of the damages to a broader proposal for reconstructing the weapons used in the siege.
In addition to the morphology of the holes, the researchers cross-referenced the data with examples of preserved dart tips in museum collections, including that of the British Museum.
The goal was to verify whether the dimensions of the cavities and the profile of the damage were compatible with metal projectiles of pyramidal cross-section, similar to those used by ancient artillery machines aimed at combatants and not against thick walls.
This detail is important because it helps understand the tactical function of the weaponry.
Instead of breaching thick walls, dart launchers served to hit exposed defenders on the battlements, archers in lateral passages, or soldiers emerging from small doors at the base of the towers.
The fan-shaped arrangement mentioned by the authors is compatible with this type of mobile and relatively narrow target.
Discovery may rewrite understanding of Roman weapons
The interest sparked by the research arises less from the image of an “ancient machine gun” and more from what it suggests about the level of technical sophistication available in the Hellenistic and Republican periods.
If the hypothesis is correct, Pompeii will have provided the first set of material marks directly associated with the use of a repeating machine described by classical authors, but never found intact in excavations.
This changes the weight of written accounts about ancient military engineering.
For a long time, the polybolos was restricted to the realm of literary sources and experimental reconstructions.
The new analyses do not equate to the discovery of the weapon itself, but reinforce the possibility that the mechanism was indeed employed in war operations and not merely conceived as a theoretical exercise in mechanics.
There is also a broader effect on the reading of the siege of Pompeii.
The episode often appears in the background against the destruction caused by Vesuvius, but the traces of the walls show that the city had already undergone a traumatic experience of conquest nearly a century earlier.
By recovering these scars, archaeology restores prominence to a Republican phase in which Campania was at the center of decisive military disputes.
Although international coverage highlighted an estimated speed of around 109 meters per second, the numerical data did not appear with the same clarity in the accessible primary text of the most recent research.
What is firmly documented, for now, is the association between the quadrangular impacts, digital modeling, and the hypothesis of the use of an automatic dart launcher in the context of Sullan siege.
The more prudent reading, therefore, is of a relevant advance, but still open, regarding ancient military engineering.
The walls of Pompeii do not deliver a complete museum piece, but offer a rare mineral archive, in which the shape of the damages, the spatial distribution, and the comparison with ancient sources begin to support an interpretation previously considered unlikely.
Seja o primeiro a reagir!