1. Home
  2. / Interesting facts
  3. / Bureaucracy Leaves Ship With Nearly 3,000 Cows on the Verge of Death, Adrift at Sea Facing Overcrowding, Extreme Heat, Lack of Ventilation, and Animals May Not Survive Another Month
Reading time 5 min of reading Comments 5 comments

Bureaucracy Leaves Ship With Nearly 3,000 Cows on the Verge of Death, Adrift at Sea Facing Overcrowding, Extreme Heat, Lack of Ventilation, and Animals May Not Survive Another Month

Written by Geovane Souza
Published on 22/11/2025 at 09:07
Burocracia deixa navio com quase 3 mil vacas a beira da morte, vagando no mar e enfrentando superlotação, calor extremo e falta de ventilação; animais podem não resistir a mais um mês
Foto: O navio, de bandeira de Togo e construído em 1973, saiu de Montevidéu em 19/20 de setembro com 2.901 novilhas prenhes destinadas à engorda e reprodução em Bandirma, na Turquia.
  • Reação
  • Reação
  • Reação
7 pessoas reagiram a isso.
Reagir ao artigo

Spiridon II Vessel, with 2,901 Pregnant Cows Loaded in Uruguay Heading to Turkey, Has Been Adrift Between Europe and Africa for Weeks. NGOs Call it a “Death Voyage,” Pressure European Governments, and Rekindle Discussion on Live Animal Exports, a Sensitive Topic Also for Brazil.

Nearly 3,000 Uruguayan Cows have been trapped for over two months on the cargo ship Spiridon II, which is crossing the Mediterranean towards South America. The vessel has been prevented from unloading its cargo in Turkey due to documentation issues and is now described by activists as a “death ship.”

The ship, registered under Togo and built in 1973, left Montevideo on September 19/20 with 2,901 pregnant heifers destined for fattening and breeding in Bandirma, Turkey. Upon arriving at its destination on October 22, the cargo was rejected due to irregularities in mandatory ear tags and health records.

Since then, the Spiridon II has spent weeks anchored off the Turkish coast, in quarantine, with reports of overcrowding, extreme heat, lack of ventilation, and carcasses accumulating on board. Under pressure from public opinion and organizations like the Animal Welfare Foundation (AWF), the authorities allowed only a quick stop for refueling before ordering its return to Uruguay.

NGOs warn that, with the new crossing taking about a month, the animals could spend 87 days at sea, many already weakened, sick, or dead. For activists, the crisis exposes a systemic failure in the international live cattle trade and serves as a warning for exporting countries like Brazil and Uruguay.

How the Spiridon II Vessel Became Trapped Between Uruguay and Turkey

YouTube Video

The Spiridon II departed from the port of Montevideo headed for Bandirma carrying pregnant Uruguayan heifers, on a route that is now common in the trade of live cattle between South America and the Mediterranean. The outbound journey took just over a month, within the expected time frame for this type of transport.

Upon arriving in Turkey, the cargo was halted after inspectors identified hundreds of animals without the correct identification documentation via ear tags or electronic chips, required to track their origin and health status. With no consensus between Turkish and Uruguayan authorities, the ship remained anchored in open water for weeks, without authorization to unload the cows.

Reports from previous inspections show that the 52-year-old vessel had already accumulated over 80 registered deficiencies and provides about 4,000 m² for the animals, a space considered insufficient in situations of prolonged delays. Nevertheless, the vessel was authorized to transport nearly 3,000 cattle in a single trip.

Deaths, Abortions, and Hunger: What Animal Welfare Reports Indicate

Organizations like the Animal Welfare Foundation and Tierschutzbund Zürich, which are monitoring the case, assert that at least 58 cows have died since leaving Uruguay. Reports also indicate about 140 births on board and the existence of 90 “untraceable” calves, raising suspicion of deaths or disposal of bodies at sea.

The organizations describe a scenario of overcrowding, floors covered in feces, strong ammonia odor, and the presence of flies, with exhausted animals attempting to remain standing in a cramped space. Images released by activists show bags with carcasses on the deck and reports from crew members about the severity of the conditions.

Veterinarians specializing in live cattle transport warn that the heifers, many in late pregnancy, suffer from heat stress, lack of space, and poor ventilation, factors that significantly increase the risk of abortion and calf deaths. According to a statement from AWF, these animals were already weakened by the end of the outbound journey, and each extra day at sea amplifies their suffering.

Another critical point is the availability of feed and water. Navigation specialists consulted by maritime outlets state that ships of this size usually carry only what is necessary for the planned route, with little leeway for delays. A technical report warns that, without a new complete refueling, the risk of hunger on board is “very real”.

There is also concern for the crew, who face extended shifts in an unhealthy environment without proper training to handle sick animals and emergency births. NGOs fear that the lack of structure could lead to the disposal of bodies at sea and possible environmental impacts, with the decomposition of large amounts of organic matter in the busy waters of the Mediterranean.

Live Cattle Export: Why the Case Concerns Brazil

Although the episode involves Uruguayan cattle, the Spiridon II case resonates directly in Brazil, one of the largest live animal exporters in the world. Data from international organizations indicate that the country has ranked among the top in live cattle exports by sea, mainly to the Middle East and North Africa.

In 2023, a first-instance decision from the Federal Court even banned the export of live animals in all Brazilian ports, based on animal welfare arguments. The measure was celebrated by protection organizations, but the case remains in legal dispute, and trade continued after appeals.

Recent reports indicate that Brazil is expected to set a record for live cattle exports in 2025, reinforcing the weight of agribusiness in this market and intensifying the clash between animal welfare advocates and representatives of the livestock sector. For some experts, the Spiridon II drama can be used as an extreme example of what can occur on long-duration voyages departing from Brazilian ports as well.

The Brazilian history includes episodes of significant repercussions, such as protests at the port of Santos against shipments of tens of thousands of cattle under unsanitary conditions and accidents where animals fell into the sea during loading onto cattle ships. These cases have led to specific judicial decisions and public civil actions but have not resulted in a definitive ban on the activity.

International Pressure and Possible Paths to Avoid New Tragedies

The Spiridon II crisis has led organizations such as Compassion in World Farming and AWF itself to pressure international bodies like the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH), the European Union, and the Uruguayan government for immediate intervention. The entities advocate for urgent inspections, the transshipment of still-alive animals to onshore facilities, and, in the medium term, the end of live animal exports by sea.

Countries like New Zealand have already passed laws to gradually ban this type of transport, betting on the export of refrigerated meat as an economic alternative with a lower risk of tragedies like the Gulf Livestock 1 ship, which sank with thousands of cattle.

Animal law specialists remind that Brazil could follow a similar path, combining progressive restrictions, incentives for the meat processing industry, and stricter welfare rules on ships, while Congress discusses bills that attempt to limit or eliminate the export of live cattle.

In the comments, do you agree with the proposal to ban live animal exports by ship, even if it impacts the economy for farmers and Brazilian ports? Or do you believe it would be sufficient to reinforce the rules and inspections without ending transportation? Leave your opinion.

Inscreva-se
Notificar de
guest
5 Comentários
Mais recente
Mais antigos Mais votado
Feedbacks
Visualizar todos comentários
Mary Conradie
Mary Conradie
26/11/2025 21:26

This is what nightmares are made of.Only one route to go.BAN live **** export.

Katrina Love
Katrina Love
22/11/2025 22:54

A rather important correction – nearly three thousand, not nearly 3 cows.

At LEAST 58 cows had died by 14 November; that number would be much higher now.
Half of the 2,901 heifers loaded were pregnant and at LEAST 150 birthed or miscarried before 14 November.
They have not restocked feed since 9 November.

The ship sailed to the western edge of Sicily in the Mediterranean Sea and then headed BACK to the port of Benghazi in Libya – a full two days sailing. One hopes that there are quarantine facilities there for the purpose of offloading the remaining cows and calves, most likely for destruction, and the dead bodies for disposal.

It would make little sense to add another four days to a 30-day voyage back to Montevideo to restock or refuel.

Katrina Love
Katrina Love
Em resposta a  Katrina Love
23/11/2025 20:11

She has now been docked in Benghazi port for over 32 hours, so that is a good sign.

Mary Conradie
Mary Conradie
22/11/2025 15:25

Live **** export is EVIL & needs to STOP asap.

Geovane Souza

Especialista em criação de conteúdo para internet, SEO e marketing digital, com atuação focada em crescimento orgânico, performance editorial e estratégias de distribuição. No CPG, cobre temas como empregos, economia, vagas home office, cursos e qualificação profissional, tecnologia, entre outros, sempre com linguagem clara e orientação prática para o leitor. Universitário de Sistemas de Informação no IFBA – Campus Vitória da Conquista. Se você tiver alguma dúvida, quiser corrigir uma informação ou sugerir pauta relacionada aos temas tratados no site, entre em contato pelo e-mail: gspublikar@gmail.com. Importante: não recebemos currículos.

Share in apps
5
0
Adoraríamos sua opnião sobre esse assunto, comente!x