Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
4 min of reading 
6 comments 
STJ Confirms That Judges Can Suspend Driver’s License and Passport of Debtors Without Seizable Assets, Increasing Pressure for Debt Payment in Brazil.
Brazil is one of the countries with the highest rates of debt execution processes in the world. Millions of Brazilians face lawsuits due to unpaid loans, financing, alimony, and various contracts. Traditionally, when someone defaults, the judge determines the seizure of assets – such as real estate, vehicles, or funds in bank accounts. But what happens when the debtor has no registered assets in their name? The Superior Court of Justice (STJ) provided a controversial answer: in these situations, it is possible to adopt unconventional measures, such as suspending the driver’s license or even the passport of the debtor, forcing them to negotiate payment.
The Decision That Changed Debt Collection
In 2019, during the ruling of Special Appeal 1.782.418/DF (Theme 1.137), the STJ established that judges can apply measures not explicitly provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), as long as they are proportional and effective in ensuring debt settlement.
This includes:
-
He started running at 66 years old, broke records at 82, and is now a subject of study for having a metabolic age comparable to that of a 20-year-old, in a case that is intriguing scientists and inspiring the world.
-
Oldest tree on the planet reappears after 130 years of searches: Wattieza, 385 million years old, was 10 meters tall and had no leaves or seeds; Gilboa fossils in New York solved the mystery in 2007.
-
A 48-square-meter house assembled in hours with 4,000 bricks made of recycled plastic that does not absorb moisture, has natural thermal insulation, and costs less than 90,000 reais in a complete kit.
-
Luciano Hang revealed that Havan’s air fleet has already accumulated more than 20,000 landings, 10,000 flight hours, and 6 million kilometers traveled, and he says that without the planes, the company would never have grown so quickly.
- Suspension of the driver’s license (CNH);
- Suspension of the passport;
- Restrictions on credit cards or other documents.
The decision set a precedent and, since then, has been applied in various courts across the country, increasing pressure on debtors.
Why These Measures Were Authorized
The central argument of the STJ is that the execution process cannot be ineffective. If the debtor has no assets in their name but lives in a manner incompatible with the claimed lack of resources, it is up to the Judiciary to use alternative mechanisms to ensure the effectiveness of collection.
According to the court, measures such as the suspension of the CNH or passport do not violate fundamental rights, as they do not prevent the debtor from working or living, but serve as psychological and practical pressure for them to honor their debt.
When They Can Be Applied
The measures are not automatic. For the suspension of the CNH or passport to be determined, the judge must evaluate:
- If there are no seizable assets in the debtor’s name;
- If the measure is proportional to the value and nature of the debt;
- If there are indications that the debtor is acting in bad faith, concealing assets or refusing to negotiate.
In other words, it is not enough to be in default: it is necessary to demonstrate that traditional judicial collection has become ineffective.
The Impact on Defaulters
The STJ’s decision has increased pressure on those who owe money. Now, debtors who believed they were protected by not having assets in their names may face direct restrictions in their civil life.
A practical example: a heavily indebted businessman who continues to travel abroad may have their passport suspended until they resolve their outstanding issues.
Similarly, those who maintain a high standard of living but claim to have no resources may have their CNH blocked as a form of indirect coercion.
Criticisms of the Measure
Not everyone agrees with the decision. Constitutional law experts argue that suspending a passport or CNH can be a form of excessive restriction of individual rights, which have nothing to do directly with the debt.
Others argue that the measure may be ineffective against genuinely impoverished debtors, affecting only those who already face real financial difficulties.
Nevertheless, the courts have reiterated that the application must be case by case, avoiding injustices.
The Contrast with Civil Imprisonment for Alimony
It is worth noting that civil imprisonment still exists, but only for alimony debts. For other types of debt, the STJ does not allow imprisonment, but alternative measures like document blocking have become accepted as a coercive mechanism.
This contrast underscores the controversial nature of the decision: the ordinary debtor is not imprisoned, but their freedom to drive or travel can be restricted to pressure them into payment.
Paths for Those in Debt
For those facing this scenario, the main solution is to seek renegotiation. Many banks and creditors accept agreements even before reaching the extremes of judicial measures.
Another possibility is to legally prove the real impossibility of payment, which can prevent the application of unconventional measures.
In any case, the jurisprudence has made it clear: ignoring debts is no longer an option without consequences.
A New Chapter in Debt Collection in Brazil
The STJ’s decisions regarding the suspension of the CNH and passport inaugurate a new chapter in debt collection in Brazil. For creditors, it is a significant step in combating default. For debtors, it is a warning that the justice system may tighten the net in increasingly creative ways.
What once seemed unthinkable – having a driver’s license or passport blocked due to a debt – is now a reality in judicial processes across the country.
And the message is clear: those who owe money must negotiate. Otherwise, the pressure extends beyond the pocket and directly impacts daily freedom.
E QUEM DEPENDE DA CNH PARA SOBREVIVER, SERÁ QUE O JUDICIÁRIO PENSOU NISSO, POBRE NÃO USA CARRO PARA PASSEIO E SIM PARA NECESSIDADES E TRABALHAR, E MUITOS SÃO MOTORISTAS PROFISSIONAIS, MOTOBOY, TAXISTA, UBER, OU TRABALHA COM MÁQUINAS PESADAS, ISSO VIOLA O NÚCLEO DO INDIVIDUAL.
Pobre que usa carro pra sobreviver trabalha com o carro e paga. Pague pouco mas pague. É preciso honrar as calças que veste.
Então o judiciário se transformou numa espécie de cobrador de dívidas? Qual a responsabilidade do banco em checar se o cliente tem como pagar empréstimos? A execução cabe ao crédito e não o judiciário “espancar” o pobre.
E quem depende de transporte mesmo que tenha uma dívida ali que não pode resolver devido esse governo horrível simplesmente não vai vai ter que passar fome vai trabalhar o quê Ah pelo amor esse Brasil é uma piada mesmo nunca coloca uma condição decente com a pessoa que está com uma dívida Mas querendo fazer de tudo para derrubar o máximo que puder arrancar.