Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
4 min of reading 
2 comments 
The Ban on Bringing Foods Bought Outside the Cinema Constitutes Tied Sales, an Illegal Practice Under the Consumer Defense Code and Decisions by the STJ That Ensure the Public’s Right to Bring Snacks Similar to Those Sold On-Site.
The tie-in sales is a practice prohibited in Brazil, and the restriction on entering the cinema with foods purchased elsewhere falls precisely into this category. The law considers it abusive to condition the screening of a film, the main service, to the purchase of popcorn, soda, and candies sold exclusively at the cinema’s concession stand.
The Superior Court of Justice (STJ) has already consolidated this understanding in recent decisions, reinforcing that consumers can bring products similar to those sold on-site. This means that no one can be forced to pay much higher prices for food just because the cinema wants to impose exclusivity.
What the Law Says About Tied Sales
The Article 39, Clause I, of the Consumer Defense Code (CDC) expressly prohibits tied sales, defining it as illegal “conditioning the supply of a product or service to the provision of another product or service.”
-
Banco do Brasil sues famous influencer for million-dollar debt and intensifies debate on delinquency, risks of seizure, and direct impact on Gkay’s credibility.
-
The Senate approves a bill that criminalizes misogyny, hatred, or aversion towards women, and includes the crime in the Racism Law with a penalty of up to 5 years.
-
Chamber Approves Bill That Allows Pepper Spray for Women Over 16 and Imposes Strict Rules for Purchase, Possession, and Use as Self-Defense
-
Chamber Approves Law to Combat Leucaena, Fast-Growing Plant That Dominates Land and Threatens Native Species in Various Regions of the Country
In the case of cinemas, the ticket is the main service; food is a complementary item, and it cannot be imposed as a condition of access.
The STJ, in various decisions, reaffirmed that restricting the entry of outside food is a disguised form of tied sales.
In 2019, in Special Appeal 1.331.948/SP, the Court considered the practice of preventing the consumption of externally purchased products abusive, guaranteeing the consumer’s right to choose where to buy their snacks.
More recently, the court upheld this understanding by rejecting an appeal from a cinema chain attempting to overturn a conviction.
The message is clear: the consumer has the freedom of choice and cannot be forced to consume within the establishment itself.
What Consumers Can and Cannot Bring
The rule is simple: you can bring foods similar to those sold in the cinema, such as popcorn, soda, juice, chocolate, candies, and cookies.
That is, if the cinema offers a product of this type, the customer can bring the same kind purchased elsewhere, even if from a different brand.
On the other hand, there are justified restrictions. Foods that the cinema does not sell, such as complete meals, hot foods, or alcoholic beverages, can be banned.
The restriction also applies to products that compromise the hygiene, safety, or comfort of the audience, such as foods with strong odors, noisy packaging, or risks of excessive mess.
In summary: the rule protects the consumer, but within common sense. The idea is to curb economic abuse, not to create situations that harm the collective experience.
What to Do If the Cinema Prevents Your Entry
If an employee tries to block entry with allowed foods, the consumer has the right to contest.
The first step is to seek management and explain that the practice constitutes tied sales, citing Article 39 of the CDC.
Many cases are resolved through dialogue since most chains are aware of the prohibition.
If the impasse persists, the customer can file a formal complaint with the Procon of their state or city.
Consumer protection agencies, such as Procon-SP, Procon-SC, and Procon-MT, have already sanctioned cinemas for violating the rule.
It is also possible to report via the consumer.gov.br portal, a national tool that gathers complaints against companies.
These complaints help map abusive practices and ensure that more consumers are aware of their rights.
In recurring cases, Procon can impose significant fines and require the business to change its policies.
Jurisprudence and The Role of the Public Ministry
In addition to the STJ, the Public Ministry and the National Secretary of Consumer (Senacon) have issued technical notes reinforcing the illegality of tied sales in cinemas.
In 2024, the Public Ministry of Paraná (MPPR) concluded that preventing the entry of foods similar to those sold on-site constitutes abusive practice.
These opinions and decisions consolidate a uniform interpretation: there is no room for legal doubt.
The cinema can set rules for safety and cleanliness, but it cannot restrict the consumer’s right to choose.
Financial and Social Impact of the Practice
The debate goes beyond popcorn. The high prices of food inside cinemas directly affect public access, especially families and young people.
A simple combo can cost the same as the ticket, creating economic barriers and reducing the frequency of low-income consumers.
By curbing tied sales, the law protects market balance and the purchasing power of the population.
The goal is to prevent culture and leisure from becoming inaccessible due to abusive commercial practices.
Have you ever been barred from entering a cinema with outside food? Do you think the rule against tied sales is fair? Share in the comments how this situation happened to you; we want to hear from those who have experienced this in practice.
Reportagem muito boa! Parabéns à jornalista pela escolha relevante da matéria em direito do consumidor, pela clareza e concisão do texto.
Ah o problema é que isso aí vai afetar as pessoas que comer coisa diferente como Elma Chips, aqueles amendoins entre outras coisas esse tem que rever isso aí direito mas do jeito que esse país é comandado por lesados PDF de seta esquerda vai ficar por isso mesmo e o povo brasileiro não vai fazer nada é um povo que gosta de tomar no ****.