1. Home
  2. / Legislation and Law
  3. / INSS Does Not Decide Solely Based on the Report; Without Explaining Real Limitations, You Leave Empty-Handed Even When You Need the Benefit
Reading time 4 min of reading Comments 3 comments

INSS Does Not Decide Solely Based on the Report; Without Explaining Real Limitations, You Leave Empty-Handed Even When You Need the Benefit

Published on 17/09/2025 at 11:22
INSS não decide só pelo laudo médico; na perícia, relato claro de limitações pode definir aposentadoria por invalidez e evitar benefício negado ao segurado.
INSS não decide só pelo laudo médico; na perícia, relato claro de limitações pode definir aposentadoria por invalidez e evitar benefício negado ao segurado.
  • Reação
  • Reação
  • Reação
  • Reação
11 pessoas reagiram a isso.
Reagir ao artigo

Even With a Medical Report in Hand, the INSS Does Not Decide Only by the Report; How the Insured Reports Their Limitations During the Assessment Can Determine Whether the Benefit Will Be Approved or Denied, Warns Ribeiro Torbes Advocacy.

According to Ribeiro Torbes Advocacy, many insured individuals leave the assessment without the benefit even presenting consistent medical documents. This happens because the INSS does not decide only by the report: the evaluation also includes what the worker says to the expert and how they justify their difficulties in daily life.

Correctly expressing real limitations is crucial. Poorly phrased sentences can be interpreted as an ability to return to work, reducing the chances of granting assistance or disability retirement.

Therefore, understanding the correct terms and avoiding communication errors is essential.

What the INSS Really Evaluates in the Assessment

Many people believe that it is enough to submit reports and exams to have the request accepted. But practice shows that the INSS does not decide only by the report.

The expert analyzes the entire picture: reports, medical history, exams, and, mainly, the personal account of the insured about how the illness affects their daily routine.

According to Ribeiro Torbes Advocacy, it is at this moment that many individuals harm themselves.

By downplaying symptoms or using vague words like “I am better,” the expert may conclude that the worker is fit to return, even if the reality is different.

Words That Strengthen the Request: Incapacitating, Progressive, and Irreversible

YouTube Video

There are terms that, when they correspond to the real situation, reinforce the understanding that the insured cannot perform their duties.

Among them are:

Incapacitating: shows that the pain or limitation prevents the performance of work activities, rather than just discomfort.

Progressive: indicates that the condition tends to worsen over time, even under appropriate treatment.

Irreversible: demonstrates that the sequel or illness has no cure or total recovery, requiring permanent attention.

Ribeiro Torbes Advocacy recommends that these terms are included both in the oral account during the assessment and recorded in medical documents, to add weight to the analysis.

Phrases That Hinder and Can Generate Denial

Just as certain words help, others undermine the chance of approval. Expressions like “I am better,” “I can work,” or “sometimes it improves” can be interpreted as signs of ability.

It is also risky to say “I don’t feel pain anymore” or “I can try,” as they convey the idea that there is no effective hindrance.

According to Ribeiro Torbes Advocacy, the recommendation is to always explain the reality clearly, emphasizing that even with partial improvement or medication, limitations remain and compromise professional activity.

Documents That Convince the Expert

In addition to the appropriate discourse, well-prepared reports, updated exams, and treatment history make a difference.

Physical therapy reports, dated medical prescriptions, and referrals reinforce the consistency of the request.

Ribeiro Torbes Advocacy emphasizes that it is ideal to present documents in sequence, showing the evolution of the illness over time.

This proves that the condition is not an isolated case and that there has been a constant pursuit of treatment, increasing the credibility of the request.

Where to Seek Guidance and Avoid Mistakes

The insured can prepare better with specialized support. Offices like Ribeiro Torbes Advocacy have experience in guiding on the correct way to report limitations and organize documentation.

This reduces the risk of contradictions during the assessment and strengthens the application.

It is worth seeking information before attending the INSS, because a poorly made explanation can cost months of waiting and even the permanent loss of the benefit.

The fact is clear: the INSS does not decide solely by the report. What the insured says and proves in documents is as important as the medical diagnosis.

Knowing how to use correct terms, avoid confusing phrases, and present organized evidence can be the difference between leaving with the benefit approved or empty-handed.

And you, have you ever undergone an assessment where the result did not reflect your real condition? Do you think the INSS fairly values the word of the insured or still gives excessive weight to formal details?

Share your experience in the comments; your experience can help others facing the same challenge.

Inscreva-se
Notificar de
guest
3 Comentários
Mais recente
Mais antigos Mais votado
Feedbacks
Visualizar todos comentários
Alexandre Pereira
Alexandre Pereira
21/09/2025 22:49

Eles geralmente não estão como antes eles trabalham sem interesse….parece que está lá para negar…não são justos…

Alvaro
Alvaro
19/09/2025 03:56

Estou no INSS desde 2023 , pois tenho gonartrose 2 joelhos , tenho 64 anos e sou professor de educação física.
Já passei por uma perícia que fui reprovado por que falei q não conseguia dobrar o joelho esquerdo pois esse movimento me causa muitas dores. E o perito nem quiz verificar o joelho direito e já foi falando qcse eu não conseguia dobrar o joelho ele não poderia me avaliar. Mesmo explicando q sinto muitas dores e tinha o outro joelho para para

Marcos Antonio Da Cruz
Marcos Antonio Da Cruz
18/09/2025 13:33

Oiii boa tarde eu tive 2 enfarto com colocação de 2 stert há 7 anos e qnd foi agora dia 14 de agosto eu tive outro enfarto e foi colocado ms outro stert,e minha doença é irreversível cm fração de ejeção de 28% isso seguinifica qui meu coração ❤️ só bombeia 28% de sangue para o corpo tenho laude médico qui comprova minha doença e já venho lutando 7 anos pra mim aposentar tenho uma perícia agora dia 6 outubro e vou ver o qui o perito mim fala,e conferir o resultado da perícia a noite tenho 6 meses sem receber nada tô até passando dificuldades

Maria Heloisa Barbosa Borges

Falo sobre construção, mineração, minas brasileiras, petróleo e grandes projetos ferroviários e de engenharia civil. Diariamente escrevo sobre curiosidades do mercado brasileiro.

Share in apps
3
0
Adoraríamos sua opnião sobre esse assunto, comente!x