Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
4 min of reading 
0 comments 
Frequent Delays of Up to 10 Minutes Raise Questions Among Workers; Understand What the CLT Provides and When It Can Generate Serious Problems.
In the workplace, it is common to hear colleagues commenting that the law allows employee delays of up to ten minutes per day without issues. But is that true?
The Consolidation of Labor Laws (CLT) actually provides some tolerance in timekeeping, but it is not a “right to be late,” and if used abusively, it can even result in termination for cause.
This article explains what the law states, how courts interpret this tolerance, and why workers need to be careful not to confuse flexibility with permissiveness.
-
Government enacts new law: paternity leave increases from 5 to 20 days with gradual increases until 2029, and Social Security pays the paternity salary; companies no longer bear the absence cost, estimated at R$ 5.4 billion.
-
End of the 1-hour lunch break in the CLT? Current labor law maintains the break, allows for negotiated reductions, and defines rules for working hours and home office in Brazil.
-
Employee Fired After Accumulating 114 Days of Medical Leave in One Year, Labor Court Upholds Company’s Decision
-
Employee Fired While Treating Depression Wins in Court and Vale Is Required to Rehire Him Following Decision Based on the CLT and INSS Benefits
What the Law Determines
The CLT, in Article 58, sets the normal duration of work at eight hours a day, unless an agreement or collective convention provides for a different limit. The key point is in paragraph 1 of this article, which states:
“Variations in timekeeping not exceeding five minutes shall not be deducted or counted as extraordinary hours, observing the maximum limit of ten minutes daily.”
In practice, this means that small variations in timekeeping — whether early or late — cannot result in deductions or overtime, as long as the total difference in minutes does not exceed ten on the same day.
Therefore, if an employee arrives five minutes early and leaves five minutes late, the company cannot record this as overtime.
Similarly, if they arrive five minutes late and leave five minutes early, there will also be no deduction.
The Interpretation of the Courts
The Superior Labor Court (TST) consolidated this understanding in Súmula 366, which reinforces the CLT rule and adds: when variations exceed ten minutes daily, the excess time must be fully counted as overtime or deduction, as the employee is at the employer’s disposal.
This makes it clear that tolerance is a margin for adjustment and not an authorization to be late or leave early every day.
The Risk of Neglect
If the worker constantly uses this tolerance, even without exceeding ten minutes, the company may understand that there is neglect.
This term appears in Article 482 of the CLT as one of the grounds for termination for cause.
Neglect is characterized by a lack of interest, laziness, negligence, or unwillingness in fulfilling duties. Small delays, repeated every day, can be interpreted as an indication of this behavior.
In practice, the employer usually adopts gradual measures: first a warning, then a suspension, and, in cases of persistence, termination for cause.
Practical Examples
Imagine three different situations:
- Employee A arrives four minutes late on an isolated day. The variation is within tolerance and does not result in a deduction.
- Employee B arrives seven minutes late and leaves three minutes early. In total, the difference is ten minutes, still within the permitted range.
- Employee C arrives six minutes late every day. This behavior is habitual and exceeds the isolated margin of five minutes, which can lead to deductions and even disciplinary measures.
These examples show that the law protects the worker from occasional injustices but does not authorize them to accumulate delays repeatedly.
Impacts for Companies and Workers
On the company side, legal tolerance avoids discussions about seconds or minutes of difference that could make timekeeping unmanageable.
On the other hand, it requires monitoring to ensure that the benefit is not distorted.
For workers, the message is clear: the rule exists to ensure flexibility in occasional situations, such as traffic, transportation issues, or lines when accessing work.
However, those who frequently adopt delays risk being categorized as neglectful and losing their job for cause.
The so-called “ten-minute tolerance” is real and is provided for in Article 58, §1 of the CLT, and is also supported by Súmula 366 of the TST. It serves as a technical adjustment in timekeeping, preventing disputes over insignificant minutes.
However, this does not mean that the worker can be late every day without consequences. The law guarantees flexibility but also protects the company against abuse. When behavior becomes repetitive and demonstrates a lack of interest, it can be interpreted as neglect, as provided in Article 482 of the CLT, and may even result in termination for cause.
In summary: the law protects those who need to deal with unforeseen events but does not endorse slacking off. The best way is to use the tolerance responsibly and fulfill the work hours correctly.
Seja o primeiro a reagir!