1. Home
  2. / Economy
  3. / New Labor Law: 2-Hour Lunch? See The Break Rules And What Could Change
Reading time 7 min of reading Comments 0 comments

New Labor Law: 2-Hour Lunch? See The Break Rules And What Could Change

Written by Bruno Teles
Published on 18/04/2025 at 16:35
Nova lei trabalhista: entenda como funciona o intervalo de almoço segundo a CLT, o que mudou com a reforma de 2017 e as novas propostas que impactam pausas e jornada de trabalho.
Nova lei trabalhista: entenda como funciona o intervalo de almoço segundo a CLT, o que mudou com a reforma de 2017 e as novas propostas que impactam pausas e jornada de trabalho.
  • Reação
Uma pessoa reagiu a isso.
Reagir ao artigo

CLT Guarantees Minimum Break of 1 Hour and Up to 2 Hours for Lunch; 2017 Reform Flexibilized Rules and New Measures Discuss Breaks in Home Office

Recent research reveals that 37% of Brazilians have lunch in just 15 to 30 minutes, even though labor laws determine a much longer interval. The Consolidation of Labor Laws (CLT) legally guarantees a minimum intraday break of 1 hour for those who work a daily shift of 6 hours or more.

The new labor law under discussion rekindles the debate about the right to breaks – from the lunch of up to 2 hours to breaks in remote work – considering the changes brought about by the 2017 Reform and new proposals aimed at improving workers’ shifts and rest.

Current Rules for Lunch Break in the CLT (Art. 71)

Brazilian labor legislation establishes clear rules regarding breaks for rest and meals during the workday. According to Article 71 of the CLT, every employee who works more than 6 hours a day has the right to at least 1 hour of break for rest or lunch.

If the shift is between 4 and 6 hours daily, a 15-minute break is mandatory. Those who work up to 4 consecutive hours are not entitled to an intraday break, according to current regulations. These rest periods are not counted as working hours and serve to prevent physical and mental exhaustion among employees.

An important feature of the law is that, by default, the lunch break can be of up to 2 hours. In other words, the employer can grant breaks longer than 1 hour, provided they do not exceed 2 hours within a daily shift.

To extend the break beyond this limit, the CLT requires a written individual agreement or a provision in a collective labor agreement. In practice, this means that breaks longer than 2 hours (such as in shifts with long breaks between shifts) are only permitted with formal negotiation between the parties, ensuring legal security for both employer and employee.

Changes Brought About by the Labor Reform of 2017

The Labor Reform (Law No. 13.467/2017), in force since November 2017, introduced significant changes to intraday break rules. Before the reform, the lunch break was considered an unwaivable right: labor courts rarely approved agreements to reduce this period, understanding it as essential to the health and safety of the worker.

With the new legislation, it became allowed to negotiate the reduction of the minimum break from 1 hour to 30 minutes in shifts longer than 6 hours. This reduction can only occur through a collective agreement or convention – that is, with the participation of the union – complying with what was included in Article 611-A of the CLT in 2017.

Another important change concerns penalties for not granting the break. Until then, if the company did not provide the full lunch break, it had to pay the worker an entire extra hour plus 50%, regardless of the time omitted. With the reform, the rule became more lenient for the employer: if the break is not fully respected, the employee will be entitled to receive only the unutilized period, with an additional 50% remuneration on that missing time.

In other words, if the employee only took 45 minutes for lunch when they were entitled to 60 minutes, the company must compensate them with 15 extra minutes paid at a 50% increase. This amount has also become indemnity in nature – not subject to labor charges like FGTS or vacation – according to §4 of Article 71 of the updated CLT.

Break of Up to Two Hours: Guaranteed Right and Legal Conditions

Although many companies adopt one hour for lunch as a standard, the legislation ensures the possibility of longer breaks, of up to 2 hours daily. This flexibility in lunch time can benefit both the worker – who gets more time to rest or address personal matters – and the employer, who can adjust work shifts efficiently.

Having 2 hours for lunch is a right provided by law, not an informal concession: Article 71 of the CLT makes it clear that, unless negotiated otherwise, the break should not exceed 2 hours within the workday.

In some sectors, breaks close to the 2-hour limit are common, for example, in companies that adopt a single shift with a long stop in the middle of the day (some industries and businesses in rural towns typically close for lunch).

In these cases, the employee takes a longer break for meals and rest, returning later to complete the shift. Any break beyond two hours requires extra caution in formalization: a specific provision in a written individual agreement or in a collective agreement is necessary. This ensures that the exception complies with the law, maintaining protection for the worker without harming the organization of companies.

Breaks and Pauses in Remote Work

With the rise of remote work (telecommuting), questions arose about the application of break rules outside the office environment. The CLT, since the 2017 reform, included telecommuting among special work modes, originally exempt from time control (without time recording) when carried out by task or production.

However, a recent legislative update – Law No. 14.442/2022 – adjusted this issue, allowing employees in home office to have their shifts controlled by schedule or to work on demand. If the remote worker is subject to time control, the rights to breaks stipulated in the CLT fully apply, just like in face-to-face work. Thus, even when working from home, the employee must take their lunch break normally when they are on fixed hours.

The current legislation also introduced the concept of “disconnection time” in remote work. It is the employer’s duty to guide the employee in home office to respect rest and off periods, ensuring that they do not stay connected longer than necessary.

In other words, the company must make the remote worker aware to take their regular breaks – whether for lunch, stretching, or simply disconnecting from the computer – and to observe rest at the end of the day and on weekends. This measure aims to prevent issues such as invisible excessive work hours (when the professional feels like they are “always on call”) and preserve mental and physical health in the home office.

Breaks Are Essential for Health and Productivity

Occupational health and productivity experts emphasize the importance of regular breaks during the workday. An international study found that a brief 10-minute break can reduce fatigue and increase energy of the professional.

These short breaks to stand up, drink water, or snack quickly help to “oxygenate” the brain and renew concentration, preventing a drop in performance in the following hours. Contrary to past beliefs, working non-stop does not mean producing more – in fact, well-timed breaks can boost productivity, as they reduce errors caused by excessive fatigue and improve focus when resuming tasks.

From the standpoint of health and safety, breaks act as a protective factor. Requiring the employee to work many hours in a row without a break increases the risk of issues such as occupational stress, repetitive strain injuries (for those who perform manual tasks or work on computers), and even workplace accidents due to distraction.

Therefore, Brazilian legal norms have always treated the intraday break as a fundamental right of the worker, linked to their dignity and well-being. Labor courts have established that the lunch break is “essential for the health and safety” of the employee. Companies that disrespect this right may not only face legal penalties but also suffer losses with sick, demotivated, or less productive employees. In summary, respecting lunch hours and breaks throughout the day benefits both the worker and the company, creating a healthier and more efficient work environment.

New Labor Law: New Rules for Breaks and Shifts Under Discussion

The topic of “new labor law” has gained prominence in 2024 and 2025 with various initiatives seeking to improve legislation on shifts and breaks. In early 2023, the federal government created working groups to discuss adjustments to the CLT and the 2017 Reform, focusing on points such as collective negotiation, work on digital platforms, and social protection. One of the concrete outcomes was the submission of a complementary law project to regulate the work of app drivers, approved by the executive in 2024.

The proposal establishes rights such as minimum wage per hour and daily limit of 12 hours of connection to platforms – in practice, after 12 hours of work in one day, the driver must rest, ensuring an adequate break before resuming activities the next day.

Another recent update involves paid weekly rest and work on Sundays. In November 2023, the Ministry of Labor published Ordinance No. 3,665, which changed the rules for working on Sundays and holidays in the retail sector.

Starting in July 2025, commercial establishments will only be able to call in employees on those days if there is a provision in a labor collective agreement, respecting municipal laws and ensuring compensatory time off. The new rule revokes previous flexibility, returning to valuing collective negotiation to define Sunday shifts and reinforcing the employee’s right to weekly rest when there is no specific agreement.

There is also ongoing discussion in Congress about the possibility of reducing the weekly work shift without salary reduction, an idea inspired by international experiences aimed at improving quality of life. A project currently in the Senate suggests more flexible work shift models – for example, a 4-day week – citing studies that indicate a 7% reduction in employees’ stress levels without loss of productivity when work hours are reduced.

These discussions indicate a trend towards legislation focused on balance between work and rest, adapting rules to new realities (such as telecommuting and the gig economy) and demands for well-being.

Inscreva-se
Notificar de
guest
0 Comentários
Mais recente
Mais antigos Mais votado
Feedbacks
Visualizar todos comentários
Bruno Teles

Falo sobre tecnologia, inovação, petróleo e gás. Atualizo diariamente sobre oportunidades no mercado brasileiro. Com mais de 7.000 artigos publicados nos sites CPG, Naval Porto Estaleiro, Mineração Brasil e Obras Construção Civil. Sugestão de pauta? Manda no brunotelesredator@gmail.com

Share in apps
0
Adoraríamos sua opnião sobre esse assunto, comente!x