STF Decision Confirms That The Benefit Can Automatically Cease In 120 Days, Unless The Insured Requests An Extension.
The STF formed a majority in the judgment regarding the constitutionality of the so-called scheduled discharge in sick leave, a mechanism that establishes an automatic duration for the benefit. The decision, made in the virtual plenary in Extraordinary Appeal (RE) 1.347.526, has nationwide repercussions and establishes that the benefit may cease after 120 days, if the insured does not request an extension. According to the Migalhas portal, the analysis, which addresses Theme 1,196 of general repercussion, has a voting deadline until 11:59 PM this Friday (12), but a majority has already been formed.
So far, the relator Cristiano Zanin has been followed by ministers Alexandre de Moraes, Gilmar Mendes, Flávio Dino, André Mendonça, Dias Toffoli, and Edson Fachin, consolidating the favorable majority. The measure was established by Law 13.457/2017, after conversion of Provisional Measure 767/2017, which amended paragraphs 8 and 9 of article 60 of Law 8.213/1991.
What Is The Scheduled Discharge In Sick Leave
The scheduled discharge is a mechanism that sets, at the time of granting, an estimated deadline for the end of the benefit.
-
The largest executive jet in Brazil belongs to the Safra Family and is for sale: it is a 2002 Boeing BBJ, with a range of 11,500 km, 80 m² of interior space, a master suite, an office, and capacity for 18 passengers.
-
BRICS is building its own payment system that could be operational by 2030, and experts say it could increase trade between the countries by up to 10% per year and add 3% to the GDP of each member of the bloc.
-
Government suspends over 3 million traffic fines in Brazil and drivers breathe a sigh of relief.
-
Iran has just approved toll charges for ships in the Strait of Hormuz and has completely prohibited the passage of vessels from the United States and Israel in the world’s most important maritime route for the global energy market.
If the deadline expires and the worker is still not fit to return, they must request an extension from the INSS. This request is evaluated by a new medical examination.
The relator, Minister Cristiano Zanin, highlighted that sick leave is temporary, and the prior establishment of a deadline does not violate the Constitution. According to him, the measure optimizes medical examination resources, organizes the social security system, and maintains the possibility of extension as a guarantee for the insured.
The STF Thesis and Its Foundations
In general repercussion, Zanin proposed the following thesis:
“The stipulation of an estimated deadline for the duration of the sick leave benefit, as established in paragraphs 8 and 9 of article 60 of Law 8.213/91, with wording given by MPs 739/16 and 767/17, converted into Law 13.457/17, does not violate articles 62, caput and §1, and 246 of the Federal Constitution.”
This understanding revokes, at the national level, a decision of the Recourse Chamber of the Federal Special Courts of Sergipe, which had declared the scheduled discharge unconstitutional. With the general repercussion, all courts and judges must follow the interpretation established by the STF.
Who Is Affected By The Decision
The decision directly impacts thousands of insured individuals receiving sick leave benefits. Previously, there were judicial divergences regarding the validity of the automatic deadline, creating legal uncertainty. Now, the understanding is uniform: the benefit may cease in 120 days, unless an extension is requested.
In practice, the insured must be mindful of the deadline set by the INSS. If they are still incapacitated, they must submit the extension request before the deadline. Failure to comply with this procedure may lead to the loss of the benefit.
Why The Topic Generates Controversy
For critics, the scheduled discharge shifts the responsibility to the insured to continuously prove their incapacity, which could create difficulties for those facing serious illnesses or mobility limitations.
On the other hand, supporters of the measure argue that the previous system overburdened medical examinations with unnecessary reviews and increased public spending.
Migalhas highlighted that the decision aims to balance administrative efficiency with social security, ensuring the continuation of assistance when truly necessary, while imposing control against abuse and fraud.
Where The Decision Applies
Due to its binding effect, the judgment of the STF applies throughout the national territory. This means that courts, special courts, and federal courts must adopt the same interpretation, leaving no room for divergent decisions.
The impact is immediate, reinforcing the validity of article 60 of Law 8.213/91.
Moreover, the decision serves as a reference for public policies related to granting social security benefits, bringing predictability for both the government and the insured.
Is It Worth Appealing?
The insured who feels harmed can still appeal individually in specific cases, for example, if there is an error in the examination or proven difficulty in requesting the extension.
However, the thesis established by the STF greatly limits the chances of reversal, as judges must follow the guidance set by the Court.
The decision of the STF consolidates the validity of the scheduled discharge in sick leave, ending a long judicial dispute over the topic.
For workers, the main change lies in the need to pay attention to the deadline and the obligation to request an extension if incapacity persists.
For the social security system, it represents a step in the rationalization of benefits management.
And you, what do you think of this decision? Does the scheduled discharge bring more efficiency or could it harm those who truly need it?
Share your opinion in the comments; we want to hear real experiences from those dealing with sick leave on a daily basis.

Essa alta vêm para acabar para quem mais precisa. Esses ministros pense bem, eles seram julgados por um só criador Jeová
Deveria ser pelo menos seis meses