Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
2 min of reading 
5 comments 
Man Receives R$ 3,950 By Mistake In Pix, Blocks Who Sent The Amount And Refuses To Return, The Case Will Go To Court And The Decision Is Still To Come
The 2nd Small Claims Court of Águas Claras ordered the return of R$ 3,950 resulting from a Pix Sent By Mistake. The court decision addresses the unjust enrichment identified after a failure in the transfer.
Details About The Pix Sent By Mistake
The plaintiff reported that he was trying to transfer the amount between accounts in his own name when he typed the key incorrectly. Due to the operational error, the Pix Sent By Mistake was sent to the defendant’s account.
After identifying the error, the requester sought immediate contact with the recipient of the amount. The man, however, blocked the plaintiff’s attempts to communicate and did not return the received amount spontaneously.
-
Latin America is stagnant, and Brazil is part of the problem, says the World Bank in a report that highlights Argentina as the main positive exception in the region thanks to fiscal adjustment and Milei’s reforms.
-
Germany is investing in the interior of São Paulo to test the production of green hydrogen and aviation fuel made from sugarcane in a partnership with Cocal and Siemens that could change the Brazilian energy sector.
-
France takes 129 tons of gold from New York, profits $15.1 billion, and raises alarms in Europe fearing to leave reserves under U.S. control.
-
35 medical entities criticize the MP that automatically renews driver’s licenses without fitness exams: they say that diseases do not show up in fines; Congress analyzes RNPC after 38,253 deaths and a cost of R$ 400 million directly to SUS.
The plaintiff contacted the bank, but the institution stated that it could not perform reversals or blocks on client accounts. The defense of the financial institutions claimed that they have no legitimacy to appear as defendants.
Justification Of The Court Decision
The judge highlighted that a Central Bank regulation prevents banks from disposing of funds without the owner’s authorization or a court order. The defendant did not respond in the process, which is why his default was declared.
The magistrate noted that, although the plaintiff was solely at fault for the typing error, this does not exempt the defendant. The responsibility to take the Justice for the Pix Sent By Mistake falls on the one who made the error.
The judicial authority declared that anyone who enriches at the expense of others must return the amount. There is no doubt about the plaintiff’s right to recover the R$ 4,000 from the Pix Sent By Mistake.
Casos e jurisprudência antigos. Quem recebe indevidamente tem que devolver. Usar sempre a função devolver pix, nunca fazer outro.
Aconteceu comigo de colocar créditos no celular e digitar os últimos dois números trocados, e reembolsar outro número de celular de outra pessoa.
ele sabe que provávemente. Vai ter que pagar indenizaçao ao que enviou o dinheiro ?????