Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
4 min of reading 
0 comments 
The Five Most Common Situations Faced by Workers Show How Legislation Protects Employees from Illegal Demands, Ensuring That Warnings, Job Changes, Vacation, Use of Personal Equipment, and Notice Period Follow Defined Limits Established by Law.
The relationship between employers and workers is regulated by an extensive set of rules from the Consolidation of Labor Laws and the Federal Constitution. Nonetheless, many employees still face undue pressure on a daily basis.
Knowing the legal limits prevents abuse, protects rights, and helps maintain balanced professional relationships.
Below is a detailed overview of five actions that the company cannot impose, based on articles from the CLT, court decisions, and constitutional guarantees.
-
The new Civil Code could revolutionize marriages in Brazil with “express divorce” and changes that could exclude spouses from inheritance.
-
Banco do Brasil sues famous influencer for million-dollar debt and intensifies debate on delinquency, risks of seizure, and direct impact on Gkay’s credibility.
-
The Senate approves a bill that criminalizes misogyny, hatred, or aversion towards women, and includes the crime in the Racism Law with a penalty of up to 5 years.
-
Chamber Approves Bill That Allows Pepper Spray for Women Over 16 and Imposes Strict Rules for Purchase, Possession, and Use as Self-Defense
The Company Cannot Force You to Sign a Warning
No worker is obliged to sign a warning. The signature serves only as confirmation of acknowledgment, not as acceptance of guilt.
Refusing to sign does not invalidate the warning. The company may record witnesses, but cannot force the employee. Coercing someone to sign may constitute an abuse of power.
The legal basis is in Article 818 of the CLT and Article 373 of the Civil Procedure Code, which determine that the responsibility to prove allegations always lies with the employer.
Refusing to sign is a right. And the employee does not suffer any harm for it.
The Company Cannot Require the Worker to Use Their Own Phone
Article 2 of the CLT makes it clear that the risks of economic activity belong solely to the employer. This includes tools, equipment, and devices necessary for the execution of tasks.
Therefore, the company cannot require the worker to use their personal phone for work. When this happens, there is an illegal transfer of costs from the activity to the employee.
There are decisions from the Labor Court mandating compensation when using the personal device causes wear, internet consumption, or the need for constant availability outside working hours.
If work requires a phone, it is the company’s responsibility to provide the equipment or to reimburse the employee adequately.
The Company Cannot Change Your Role Without Agreement
Changing tasks without consent can lead to role deviation or role accumulation. Article 468 of the CLT prohibits unilateral changes that harm the worker.
When the employee is assigned to perform a task different from the one contracted, especially if it involves greater responsibility, new skills, or overload, the Justice recognizes the right to salary differences.
The Federal Constitution, in Article 7, reinforces the principle of compatible remuneration. This prevents companies from using the same salary for different functions.
If there is a significant change, the employee can question, refuse, or negotiate formally.
The Company Cannot Require the Worker to Sell Part of Their Vacation
The sale of one-third of vacation is an exclusive right of the employee. Article 143 of the CLT is clear: converting the period into financial compensation depends solely on the will of the worker.
Pressuring, inducing, or imposing the sale is illegal. Annual rest is protected by Article 7 of the Constitution, which guarantees paid vacation with an additional one-third.
The employer must respect the worker’s decision, who can choose to rest fully or sell only if they wish.
No company can turn this choice into an imposition.
The Company Cannot Require Notice to Be Served at Home
Notice can be served or compensated, according to Article 487 of the CLT. However, there is no legal provision for notice “served at home.”
When the company tells the worker to fulfill the notice at home, with no real activity, no adequate conditions, or just waiting for orders, this practice is often interpreted as compensated notice.
This is because there is no structure for executing activities. And the employee cannot be left in a situation of uncertainty or compulsory idleness.
If there is no effective work, payment must be fully compensated.
Why Understanding These Rights is Essential
The five situations show that many abuses arise from a lack of knowledge among both workers and companies. The CLT and the Constitution establish clear limits to preserve dignity, safety, and balance in labor relations.
Knowing what the company can or cannot demand allows the employee to protect themselves, avoid conflicts, and recognize irregularities early on.
If undue pressures arise, it is advisable to document, keep messages or requests, and talk to the responsible department. If there is no solution, the ideal is to seek specialized guidance.
The legislation exists to prevent illegalities, guarantee rest, protect salaries, and ensure that no employee is harmed by abusive demands.
Knowing these rights not only prevents problems but also strengthens the worker in the face of unfair situations.
-
-
4 pessoas reagiram a isso.