Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
5 min of reading 
1 comment 
One of the Greatest Companies of the 20th Century Revolutionized Photography, but Ended Up Being Swallowed by a Technological Change It Initiated. A Fascinating Story Full of Twists That Still Today Leaves Lessons for Businesses of All Sizes.
The story of Kodak is one of the most fascinating and, at the same time, tragic trajectories in the business world.
Founded in 1888 by George Eastman, the company transformed the way people recorded moments, making photography accessible to millions of people around the world.
Kodak was responsible for popularizing the portable camera and photographic film, allowing photography to move out of professional studios and into the daily lives of families.
-
He started running at 66 years old, broke records at 82, and is now a subject of study for having a metabolic age comparable to that of a 20-year-old, in a case that is intriguing scientists and inspiring the world.
-
Oldest tree on the planet reappears after 130 years of searches: Wattieza, 385 million years old, was 10 meters tall and had no leaves or seeds; Gilboa fossils in New York solved the mystery in 2007.
-
A 48-square-meter house assembled in hours with 4,000 bricks made of recycled plastic that does not absorb moisture, has natural thermal insulation, and costs less than 90,000 reais in a complete kit.
-
Luciano Hang revealed that Havan’s air fleet has already accumulated more than 20,000 landings, 10,000 flight hours, and 6 million kilometers traveled, and he says that without the planes, the company would never have grown so quickly.
With the slogan “You press the button, we do the rest,” Kodak became a household name and solidified its position as a global leader in analog photography for over a century.
By the 1970s, Kodak was responsible for about 90% of the photographic film market and 85% of the camera market in the United States.
The Kodachrome film, for example, was one of the most popular and used by amateurs and professionals, responsible for capturing cultural icons and historical events.
The Invention of the Digital Camera That Kodak Itself Did Not Embrace
However, despite its leadership, Kodak made one of the most studied strategic mistakes in business history.
The company was a pioneer in creating digital technology but neglected its disruptive potential.
In 1975, engineer Steve Sasson from Kodak invented the first functional digital camera.
The camera used a CCD sensor (charge-coupled device) and was capable of capturing digital images, which were stored on magnetic tapes.
However, Kodak’s management dismissed the idea, fearing that the new technology would hurt the profitable sales of film and photographic paper.
This decision marked a corporate conservatism that would ultimately seal the company’s fate.
During the 1980s and 1990s, other companies, such as Sony, Canon, and Fujifilm, heavily invested in the development of digital photography, while Kodak insisted on protecting its traditional model.
Although the company launched digital products and acquired some companies in the sector, its actions were timid and late.
Kodak seemed trapped in a dilemma: how to embrace the future without sacrificing its present?
The Advance of Digital Photography and the Downfall of the Giant
With the advancement of digital technology, photography became more accessible, instantaneous, and free from the limitations imposed by analog film.
Digital cameras quickly took over the market, while cell phones began to incorporate photographic features, making photography even more democratic.
Kodak, which once reigned supreme, began to lose relevance.
Its attempts to adapt, such as launching printers and online development services, were not enough to offset the decline in sales of film and analog cameras.
In the early 2000s, Kodak was still generating billions of dollars, but was already feeling the effects of the digital revolution.
In 2012, after years of financial struggles and failed reinvention attempts, the company filed for bankruptcy protection (Chapter 11) in the United States.
This moment symbolized the downfall of one of the most iconic brands in history.
Kodak had gone from an innovative leader to a classic example of how resistance to change can lead to ruin.
The Timid Survival and Lessons for the Market
Despite this, Kodak did not completely disappear.
After restructuring and selling various patents, the company managed to emerge from bankruptcy in 2013, focusing on areas such as digital printing, packaging materials, and chemicals.
More recently, the company attempted to diversify its operations, even announcing plans to produce pharmaceutical ingredients during the COVID-19 pandemic, although this project generated controversy and investigations for suspicious irregularities.
Kodak’s trajectory offers valuable lessons about the impact of disruptive innovation and the importance of companies adapting to new technologies.
While some brands, like Fujifilm, managed to reinvent themselves and thrive in the digital environment, Kodak remained stuck in the past.
Fujifilm, for example, diversified its activities into sectors such as cosmetics, medical materials, and high-tech printing, demonstrating resilience and strategic vision.
The story of Kodak also illustrates how a brand can survive even after a monumental fall.
Today, the company still manufactures photographic film—for a niche of enthusiasts and professionals who value the aesthetics of analog—and specialized equipment.
However, its relevance will never be the same.
The name Kodak evokes nostalgia and also serves as a warning to companies in all sectors: innovating is no longer optional; it is a matter of survival.
The Irony of the Story and the Warning for the Future
Curiously, the irony of Kodak’s story is that it was a pioneer in creating the technology that would bring it down.
Steve Sasson, the inventor of the digital camera, declared years later that the resistance from upper management was predictable but inevitable.
Kodak focused on the short term, on the safety of film profit margins, and ignored the long-term potential of digital photography.
If it had adopted an aggressive digital innovation strategy from the start, the company could have maintained its leadership.
However, by protecting its traditional business model, Kodak lost ground to more agile competitors willing to embrace change.
Its downfall became a case study in business schools and an emblematic example of corporate myopia.
The rise and fall of Kodak is more than just a story of bankruptcy.
It is a powerful reminder that innovation can be both an opportunity and a threat.
And, above all, it is a lesson about the importance of knowing when it is time to press the button and leave the rest for the future.
What do you think? Could Kodak have survived if it had embraced digital from the start? Leave your opinion in the comments!
Teria sobrevivido alguns anos a mais com as câmeras digitais mas ainda teria provavelmente falecido com a chegada dos celulares. Quem sabe….