Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
5 min of reading 
0 comments 
Instagram Post Attributed to Young American Alyssa Carson a NASA Mission to Mars, But Official Information Disproves the Narrative and Shows There Is No Selection or Announcement of Confirmed Human Flight.
The post that circulated this Wednesday (24) on Instagram, attributing to the American Alyssa Carson, 24 years old, an invitation from NASA to join “the first crewed mission to Mars, one-way only,” is false.
There is no official announcement of a human mission to Mars with a set date, designated spacecraft, approved budget, public schedule, and named crew.
Nor is there confirmation that Carson is part of the agency’s astronaut corps.
-
At 73.8 meters tall, the world’s tallest teapot-shaped building has 15 floors, ensures stability, and impresses with an internal space of 28,000 cubic meters.
-
Ambev has planted over 3 million trees and restored an area equivalent to the coastline from São Paulo to Natal, and the result after 15 years of silent investment has finally appeared for all of Brazil to see.
-
A new AI collar technology for cattle eliminates physical fences, creates virtual barriers, monitors animals 24/7, and detects changes in behavior and health.
-
For a few weeks each year, an entire country blooms with billions of tulips, creating a mosaic of colors visible from the sky, while a single garden gathers more than 7 million flowers and attracts visitors from around the world to one of the most impressive shows in Europe.
NASA is maintaining strategies and studies for the “Moon to Mars” objective, but this does not equate to a flight manifest with names and firm deadlines.
NASA and Flight Plans for Mars
In addition to the absence of a flight plan, checking public records shows that Carson is not part of the active astronaut list of the NASA and does not appear in the most recent classes of candidates presented by the agency.
The official astronaut list and the announcements of the classes of 2021 and 2025 do not include her name.
The agency outlines a long-term architecture for sending humans to the red planet, with steps that include a sustained return to the Moon, validation of life support systems, radiation protection, and integration of payloads and vehicles.
These documents describe objectives and elements of the program, not a specific flight or a defined crew.
In other words, they deal with the infrastructure and technological path, not with a “one-way” mission.
“One-way” projects, on the other hand, are not currently underway in the institutional sphere.
The private initiative Mars One, which promised Mars colonization without return, went bankrupt in 2019, without launching any mission.
Instagram post with false information went viral:
Who Is Alyssa Carson
Carson gained visibility since her teenage years by declaring her dream of being the first person on Mars.
She participated in educational programs, camps, and private simulations related to STEM and space exploration, a role that positioned her as a promoter of the topic.
This, however, does not make her a career astronaut or a selected candidate by NASA for a mission.
Biographical sheets and independent checks reinforce that she is not affiliated with the agency and that content describing her as “astronaut in training” with NASA reproduces an incorrect label.
Narrative Without Technical Grounding
The viral narrative combines real biographical traits — long-term interest in space exploration and role as a promoter — with a non-existent element: the selection for a human flight to Mars.
Institutional publications announcing crews usually provide launch window, vehicle, objectives, ship profile, and flight manifest.
None of this appears in official channels in the cited case.
The “Moon to Mars” architecture itself clarifies that it is not “a manifesto, nor a set of requirements” for a specific mission.
Meanwhile, the upcoming crewed agenda of NASA is focused on the Artemis missions, which target lunar orbits and return to the Moon’s surface as a precursor to Mars.
This public sequence contrasts with the idea of a direct, immediate, and one-way jump to the red planet.
How Misinformation Gained Reach
The Brazilian post on Instagram gathered thousands of interactions and comments with disparate readings.
One user wrote, “I’m almost doing the same as her,” in hypothetical adherence.
Another associated the supposed “one-way” with vocational sacrifice: “Guys, you really have to love this profession… according to Google, it takes 9 months to get there.” There was also irony and outburst: “You’re not missing anything… I’d do the same.”
Recurring questions sustained the reach: “Now a question: why will she never come back to Earth?” and “Is there still a spot? Does it cost to fly?” Others expressed concern regarding isolation and health: “Wow, it would be so lonely… you die there and there’s no hospital.”
Political mentions appeared, as well as comments on everyday life.
Amid the multiplicity of voices, one profile summarized points of checking and retrieved the history of failed projects: “The girl in the photo… was not chosen to go to Mars… What existed… was Mars One… which was canceled.”
How to Identify Misleading Posts
In content with claims of official status, the safe conduct is to check, on the agency’s own channels, if there is institutional announcement with launch window, vehicle, budget, objectives, schedule, and named crew.
NASA transparently publishes the list of active astronauts and announces the new candidate classes, allowing checks if a given name is included in the roster.
The absence of these elements is a red flag.
It is also useful to identify if texts about “Mars mission” cite basic operational documents, such as flight manifest, integration plans and tests, ship profile, and description of objectives.
Successive absences suggest that it is a viral narrative built on true biographical traits and unverified assumptions.
Previous journalistic checks have already disproved similar versions involving Carson, reinforcing that there is no official selection for a human flight to Mars involving the young woman.
The Technical Path to Mars
Crewed missions beyond Earth’s orbit require validation of critical systems: life support for months, radiation shielding, logistics of payloads, safe re-entry, and remote maintenance capability.
The agency’s own technical literature and official communications make it clear that the path involves technological and operational steps until a crewed flight to Mars is feasible — and round trip.
When a post ignores this sequence and appears without documents, it tends to be disconnected from the practice of contemporary space exploration.
Fact-Check Result
Based on the most recent public information, there is no announced human mission to Mars with crew, date, and “one-way” architecture.
There is no official record that Alyssa Carson has been selected as a NASA astronaut. And the most cited project when discussing “one-way,” Mars One, no longer exists since 2019.
The post that went viral, therefore, lacks documentary support and misleads by suggesting that a “24-year-old young woman” was chosen and would have “accepted” not to return to Earth.
-
-
-
-
-
-
87 pessoas reagiram a isso.