Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
6 min of reading 
11 comments 
Fence At The Border, Wild Boars In The Crosshairs, And Biosecurity To Prevent Billion-Dollar Losses In The Export Pig Farming Sector, With Construction Completed In 2019 And A Debate On Efficacy And Environmental Impact In The Heart Of Europe, Where African Swine Fever Remains At The Center Of Sanitary Measures.
Denmark has installed a fence along part of its border with Germany as a biosecurity measure to reduce the risk of African swine fever entering the country through the movement of wild boars.
The structure, designed to follow the land border line, has been presented as a physical barrier aimed at protecting Danish pig farming, a sector heavily focused on exports, and preventing losses associated with a disease that can be fatal to pigs and wild boars but does not affect humans.
African Swine Fever And The European Context
The decision to build the barrier was made in a context of European concern about African swine fever, an infectious disease that affects domestic pigs and wild boars and that, according to European health authorities, currently has no vaccine available to combat the virus.
-
In France, a group of artisans spends 28 years building a medieval castle with 13th-century tools, without machines, without measuring tapes, and with almost zero carbon footprint, and the rediscovered techniques helped in the reconstruction of Notre-Dame.
-
Tourists on Everest were poisoned by guides who mixed substances in food to provoke false symptoms of altitude sickness while helicopter operators and hospitals charged inflated rescue fees to insurance companies.
-
Few people know this, but Neil Armstrong, one of the most famous NASA astronauts in history, survived the Korean War after jumping from the plane during his seventh combat mission aboard the USS Essex aircraft carrier of the United States.
-
Diving with a camera in Lake Furnas reveals a submerged city with an entire street, almost intact houses, a preserved bridge, a wood stove, a Kombi, and even a bus at the bottom of the largest lake in the Southeast.
The risk to the production chain is not just sanitary: in countries where detection occurs, control measures are usually triggered that impact the movement of animals and trade, which can directly affect pork exporters.
Billion-Dollar Pig Industry And Pressure For Protection
In the Danish case, the economic argument emerged from the announcement of the project.
The fence was described as an attempt to protect a sector that generates billions in exports.
In 2018, the public debate coverage itself pointed out the financial aspect as one of the main reasons for the country “not wanting to take risks,” especially because of the significance of pork in external sales.
The same line of justification was repeated in materials that described the fence as part of a set of actions to decrease the chance of the virus entering the territory.
Construction Of The Fence And Chronology Up To 2019
The construction began in 2019 and the work was reported as completed at the end of that year by official documents related to environmental and land management, in addition to records concerning the licensing schedule.
A government report produced during discussions on environmental impacts and cross-border procedures describes a timeline in which the specific law for the “wild boar fence” was adopted by the parliament in 2018, environmental permits were issued in 2018, execution took place in 2019, and completion was recorded in December 2019.
How The Fence Was Planned To Block Wild Boars
The fence was planned to be an obstacle to wild boars, with technical details including height of around 1.5 meters and buried sections to reduce the chance of passage underneath.
Project promotional materials describe that part of the structure extends below ground level and that, along the route, there are permanent openings at points associated with waterways and border crossings, as well as small passages intended for smaller animals.
This technical architecture was presented as an attempt to balance the sanitary function of the fencing with the need to maintain some degree of permeability for other species and for border crossing infrastructure.
Estimated Cost And Public Reaction
The estimated project cost also entered the debate.
Part of the European coverage published when the decision was announced cited a budget of 11 million euros to erect approximately 70 kilometers of fencing; a figure that was used both by supporters, who treated it as a preventive expense, and by critics, who questioned whether the barrier would be proportional to the actual risk of transmission from the movement of wild boars at that moment.
Environmental Impact And Fragmentation Of Wildlife
The controversy did not remain limited to the price.
The topic divided opinions as it involved the creation of a physical barrier in a border within the Schengen area, even though it was aimed at animals.
Critics pointed to possible side effects on wildlife, including the fragmentation of movement routes for species that are not the target of the fencing.
The existence of openings and specific passages itself entered the discussion as an attempt to mitigate impacts, but without eliminating concerns that a continuous structure would alter ecological connectivity along the route.
Effectiveness Of The Barrier And Limits Pointed Out By Experts
Another sensitive point was efficacy.
Part of the skepticism revolves around how African swine fever spreads between countries.
The virus can be transmitted through direct contact between animals, but it is also associated with human practices, such as the movement of contaminated products and improper disposal of food waste, which shifts part of the focus from “barrier control” to hygiene, surveillance, and enforcement measures.
At the same time, European experts have been analyzing the role of fences in different scenarios and, in more recent assessments, the European Food Safety Authority highlighted that fences can help control the spread in wild boars if used in conjunction with other actions, such as carcass removal, population management, and ongoing maintenance, reiterating that fences alone do not solve the problem.
Sanitary Belt And Package Of Complementary Measures
In practice, the Danish fence has come to function as a fixed element of a broader biosecurity package.
Information associated with the national strategy also mentions complementary measures, such as enhanced communication in stopping areas and roads, alerts for food disposal, in addition to actions aimed at the presence of wild boars.
The combination of physical barriers and protocols is often cited as the logic of the sanitary “belt”: reducing entry points, decreasing contact opportunities, and enhancing response capability in case of suspicion.
Pork Exports And The Economic Weight Of The Sector
The backdrop is a pig farming sector with a strong presence in the country’s economy.
Denmark frequently appears in statistics and sector reports as a major exporter of pork products, and industry entities periodically publish volumes and values associated with pork and animal exports.
This weight helps explain why biosecurity decisions receive political attention and become public disputes, even when they directly affect land use planning.
Fences Against Wild Boars In The European Debate
Beyond the Danish case, the discussion about fences at borders and physical barriers against wild boars has regained prominence during outbreaks of African swine fever in different areas of Europe, fueling the debate between those advocating for visible and immediate measures and those who believe the focus should be on sanitary surveillance, traceability, and controlling human routes of dissemination.
The fence at the border with Germany thus stood as a concrete example of how the fear of an animal epidemic can translate into permanent prevention infrastructure, even amidst questions about costs, environmental impacts, and the real ability to block the circulation of the virus.
After all, in the face of a disease with no vaccine available and the potential to halt exports, is a physical barrier like the Danish fence a necessary protection or an expensive symbol for a problem that depends more on human behavior than on the movement of wild boars?
Ibama na Dinamarca kkkkk
O javali não tem predador natural além do ser humano fora do seu habitat. O controle pode ser feito através da caça, e de armadilhas específicas.
SE TEM JAVALIS DEMAIS, TEM UM DESEQUILÍBRIO!
Ñ DÁ PRA APROVEITAR O EXCESSO DE JAVALIS?