Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
0 comments 
Case Involving Supermarket Employee in Arizona Began When Customer Requested 85 Lottery Tickets, Paid Only 60 and Left 25 Without Owner; One of Them Ended Up Winning US$ 12.8 Million, Generating Judicial Dispute Over Who Has the Right to the Value
Winning a lot of money from games of chance is a common desire, but a case involving a supermarket employee in Arizona, in the United States, placed a prize of US$ 12.8 million at the center of a judicial dispute after an unsold ticket was identified as a winner.
Purchase of 85 Tickets Gave Rise to Situation Involving Supermarket Employee
According to a report published by the Daily Mail, the incident began when a customer entered a supermarket and requested the issuance of 85 lottery tickets. All were printed normally in the store’s system.
However, the customer decided to pay for only part of them. Out of the 85 tickets issued, he purchased 60, leaving 25 tickets without an owner after the transaction at the establishment.
-
Attracting around 250,000 people a year, a lighthouse 200 meters from the sea, on a 60-meter high cliff, on the North Sea coast in Denmark, becomes one of the most impressive examples of how nature can threaten historical buildings.
-
The narrowest house in the world is only 63 centimeters wide, but inside it can accommodate a bathroom, kitchen, bedroom, office, and even two staircases.
-
In the middle of the sea, these enormous concrete and steel structures, built by the British Navy to protect strategic maritime routes, look like they came straight out of a Star Wars movie.
-
For years, no one could cross a neighborhood in Tokyo because of the tracks, but an impressive solution changed mobility and completely transformed the local routine.
These tickets remained on the premises without anyone purchasing them before the draw took place. They had been printed but had not been paid for or resold to another customer.
Unsold Ticket Becomes Winner of US$ 12.8 Million Prize
On the night of the draw, the event occurred that would turn the remaining tickets into a subject of dispute. One of the tickets that had not been purchased ended up being the winner of the lottery’s grand prize.
The total value of the prize reached US$ 12.8 million, an amount equivalent to just over € 11 million according to the report cited by the British outlet.
The morning after the draw, the information that the winning ticket had been issued at that supermarket began to circulate. It was at that moment that a supermarket employee found the winning ticket.
Company Claims Supermarket Employee Tried to Buy the Tickets After Discovering Prize
According to the management of the company responsible for the supermarket, a supermarket employee took action after realizing that one of the remaining tickets was the winning one.
The company claims that the worker scanned the remaining tickets one by one. Upon identifying that one of them corresponded to the grand prize, he reportedly purchased all the tickets for US$ 10 each.
According to the administration, the purchase was made to avoid raising suspicions about the procedure carried out. Even so, the action ended up being discovered later by the company.
Signature on the Ticket Did Not Guarantee Right to the Prize
After acquiring the tickets, the supermarket employee signed the back of the winning ticket. The gesture was an attempt to officially claim the million-dollar prize.
Despite this, the worker was unable to receive the amount. The dispute over who has the legitimate right to the prize ended up being taken to court.
Courts Will Decide Who Is the True Winner
The case is now being legally examined in the United States. The courts will need to determine who the true winner of the US$ 12.8 million prize is.
According to the report published by the Daily Mail, the final decision will clarify whether the ticket belongs to the supermarket employee or if the company has any rights over the prize obtained in the lottery.
While the judicial decision is not defined, the episode continues to serve as an example of how unexpected situations involving unsold tickets can generate complex disputes over who really has the right to the grand prize.
Seja o primeiro a reagir!