Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
2 comments 
President Lula Confronts Mark Zuckerberg in a Public Statement Addressing Issues Related to Social Networks. Understand the Details of This Speech and Its Possible Implications.
The president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) criticized Meta, the company that controls Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, during a speech at the Palácio do Planalto this Thursday (9). In response to the company’s decision to end its fact-checking program, Lula sent a direct message to CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
“As if a citizen could be punished for actions in real life and not be punished for the same actions in the digital world. What we actually want is for each country to have its sovereignty safeguarded. Citizens, two citizens, three citizens cannot think they can violate the sovereignty of a nation“, he added.
The president’s statement occurs amid strategic changes in the company’s digital communication and the tensions between large tech platforms and governments of different countries.
-
Maritime geopolitics: China and the USA compete for strategic ports in Peru.
-
Iran shoots down two US aircraft: F-15 fighter crashes in mountainous area, one crew member is rescued and another is still missing; second crash in the Persian Gulf exposes still active air defense, says US intelligence.
-
USA and China compete for Brazil over resources that could be worth trillions — rare earths put the country at the center of a global dispute
-
Global summit with over 40 countries pressures Iran for a blockade in the Strait of Hormuz and warns of direct impact on oil, food, and the global economy.
Mark Zuckerberg announced on Tuesday (7) the end of Meta’s fact-checking model, signaling a shift in its approach to content moderation.
Meta’s Decision: A Global Break
Meta stated that, from now on, users will have greater autonomy to correct and comment on potentially false posts, similar to what happens on X (formerly Twitter), owned by Elon Musk.
During the announcement, Mark Zuckerberg criticized what he called “secret courts” in Latin America, referring to judicial decisions that, according to him, remove content arbitrarily. Although he did not directly mention Brazil, the statement was interpreted as a reference to the Federal Supreme Court (STF).
The decision also gained prominence due to its political connection in the United States. The CEO of Meta revealed that he will work in partnership with elected President Donald Trump to resist governments that, according to him, “pressure American companies for more censorship“.
Lula and the Context of Digital Communication in Brazil
Lula stated that Meta’s decision is serious. “I will have a meeting today to discuss the issue with Meta. I think it’s extremely serious for people to want digital communication to not have the same responsibility as a person who commits a crime in the media“, the president stated.
In addition, the Brazilian government is undergoing restructuring in the communications area. Paulo Pimenta will be replaced by Sidonio Palmeira in the Secretariat of Social Communication (Secom).
STF Reacts to Mark’s Speech
Minister Alexandre de Moraes, of the STF, also spoke out against Mark Zuckerberg’s recent statements.
During an event at the Supreme Court, Moraes stated that big techs cannot be used as tools for hate speech or collaborations with extremist groups. “In Brazil, they will only continue to operate if they respect Brazilian legislation, regardless of big tech executives’ bravado“, the judge stated.
Conflict Between Meta and the Civil Internet Framework
The Federal Supreme Court is currently involved in a critical trial concerning the Civil Internet Framework, which defines the responsibilities of digital platforms regarding content published by third parties.
Meta, in turn, has advocated for a “balanced solution” that avoids regulatory excesses.
Regulation of Networks and the New Global Policy
Meta’s decision to end fact-checking reflects a more aggressive stance against global regulations. Zuckerberg justified the measure as a defense of freedom of expression.
This new positioning fits into a scenario of increasing challenges for large tech companies, which face stricter regulations in countries like Brazil, the European Union, and India.
Meanwhile, in the United States, Trump’s support reinforces the polarized political environment in which these companies operate.
Meta and Its Influence in Brazil
Although it positioned itself as an ally during critical periods, such as Brazilian elections, Meta now faces greater scrutiny.
The change in its fact-checking policy and the criticisms of the STF demonstrate a break from the collaboration model adopted until now.
This tension may directly impact how the platform is perceived by the public and the government.
estou começando a achar que esse desespero todo deles em relação a redes sociais é pra esconder alguma sujeira deles porque do nada a preocupação deles se fechou nas redes sociais.
eu uso a internet desde 2003 mais ou menos mas só ali no começo do facebook, orkut a galera já fazia criticas e ninguém se importava, a galera ja espalhava mentiras e verdades e ninguém se importava, ai agora esses caras querem controlar o que pode ou não dizer.
concordo que espalhar odio, ou difamar uma pessoa não é algo bom, porem eles não estão preocupados se alguém fala mal de mim ou espalha mentiras ao meu respeito, eles estão fazendo isso pra evitar que pessoas façam criticas a eles.
O Lula precisa se aposentar urgente! O Brasil está correndo um enorme risco com um idoso que às vezes não fala coisa com coisa. Para piorar, sua esposa xingou ‘Musk’, en uma situação **** e fora de contexto. Parece que estava sob efeito de álcool.