Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
0 comments 
FGTS Improperly Held Generates Compensation: Court Orders Release of Balance and Has Set Compensation of Up to R$ 7,000 for Moral Damages Against Banks and Employers.
The Fundo de Garantia do Tempo de Serviço (FGTS) was created by Law No. 8.036/1990 as a mandatory savings fund intended to protect workers in specific situations, such as dismissal without just cause, retirement, or serious illness. As it is a fund of a food nature, the balance of FGTS is considered exempt from seizure (Article 2, §2 of the law), except for very limited exceptions, such as for the payment of alimony.
In practice, this means that banks, employers, and even the Courts cannot withhold or block FGTS outside the legal hypotheses. When this occurs, it opens the door for requests for immediate release of the amounts and, in some cases, even for compensation for moral damages.
When the Blocking or Withholding of FGTS is Illegal
Improper blocking or withholding occurs in various situations:
-
Government enacts new law: paternity leave increases from 5 to 20 days with gradual increases until 2029, and Social Security pays the paternity salary; companies no longer bear the absence cost, estimated at R$ 5.4 billion.
-
End of the 1-hour lunch break in the CLT? Current labor law maintains the break, allows for negotiated reductions, and defines rules for working hours and home office in Brazil.
-
Employee Fired After Accumulating 114 Days of Medical Leave in One Year, Labor Court Upholds Company’s Decision
-
Employee Fired While Treating Depression Wins in Court and Vale Is Required to Rehire Him Following Decision Based on the CLT and INSS Benefits
- Financial institutions that do not release the amount after an authorized withdrawal by Caixa Econômica;
- Banks that use FGTS to offset clients’ debts without authorization;
- Administrative failures that prevent withdrawals in cases of dismissal, serious illness, or retirement;
- Error in transfer by the employer, who does not make the deposit correctly in the linked account.
In all these scenarios, the courts have ruled that the omission or abuse by the bank or employer generates not only the obligation to release the amounts but also to compensate the worker.
What the Courts Say
In 2022, the TJDFT condemned a bank for withholding FGTS amounts from a consumer for more than 40 days without justification. The decision ordered the immediate release of the balance and set compensation for moral damages in the amount of R$ 7,000.
The TJSP ruled in favor of a worker who, after being dismissed without just cause, could not access his FGTS due to an administrative error by the bank. In addition to the monetary correction, the institution was ordered to pay R$ 5,000 in moral damages.
These precedents reinforce the position of the STJ, which has already consolidated its understanding regarding the strict liability of financial institutions in cases of service failure (Summary 479).
What Compensations Can Be Awarded
Compensations vary according to the case, but the courts have recognized:
- Material damages: amounts that the worker failed to use and must be returned with correction;
- Moral damages: compensation for frustration, embarrassment, and financial difficulties caused by improper retention;
- Fines and interest: in some cases, added when there is unjustified resistance from the bank or excessive delay.
The amounts for moral damages usually range between R$ 3,000 and R$ 7,000, but in cases of greater severity — such as when a worker needs the money for health treatment — they can exceed this ceiling.
How the Worker Should Act
Those facing improperanddelays in FGTS should:
- File a report at the bank or Caixa Econômica Federal;
- Gather documents that prove the right to withdraw (termination records, work card, medical reports, court decisions, etc.);
- Keep records of customer service protocols or formal denials;
- Seek a lawyer or Public Defender to file a lawsuit requesting release and compensation.
The action can be filed in the Special Civil Courts when the amount does not exceed 40 minimum wages, which speeds up the process and reduces costs.
A Right That Cannot Be Violated
The message from the courts is clear: FGTS belongs to the worker and cannot be improperly withheld. Any blocking without legal support should be contested in Court, which not only orders the release of the amounts but can also set compensations of up to R$ 7,000 for moral damages.
More than just remedying an individual injustice, these decisions have a pedagogical effect: they remind banks and employers that respect for FGTS is a matter of dignity and financial security for millions of Brazilians.
Seja o primeiro a reagir!