Petrobras is under a bit more pressure after state finance secretaries, with the acquiescence of their governors, approved last week the unfreezing of fuel prices, those on which ICMS is levied, for the purpose of increasing revenue.
Since the beginning of the pandemic, these prices have already increased by more than 30% and are now set to rise even further. It’s worth noting that some states, such as São Paulo, have also raised rates under the current governments, and RJ maintains record rates for gasoline and ethanol.
The increase, contrary to the promise to keep them fixed until the end of January, seems to have been a retaliation due to Petrobras’ recent price hike.
-
Inflation in March reaches 0.88% according to IBGE and pressures the Brazilian economy, impacting family budgets and requiring more strategic decisions to maintain financial control.
-
In Paraná, distributor Pacto connects 100% of the load in Coronel Vivida to batteries: a BES of 10 MW and 20 MWh costs just over R$ 30 million and lowers the local tariff now.
-
With a dependence of up to 80% on gas imported from the United States, Mexico is responding with a robust energy strategy, betting on shale gas, creating a scientific committee, and preparing to expand natural gas production to reduce vulnerability and strengthen its energy security in the coming years.
-
The United States proposes to Brazil a critical minerals agreement with a minimum price to combat Chinese dumping and priority for investment, but the Planalto is blocking the signing out of fear of upsetting China and due to electoral calculations in a year of competition.
Since the FHC government, Petrobras is no longer a state-owned company, as more than 70% of its shares are in the hands of private investors, whether Brazilian or foreign. Many were even purchased by Brazilian workers using FGTS.
The Brazilian government, along with some state banks, holds just over 50% of its common shares, those that allow voting, thus having control.
Nevertheless, Petrobras and its executives are not free from being sued in court for a reckless action, which is failing to fulfill the mission of providing the best possible return on capital for its investors, paying hefty fines, as the company almost had to do. It is worth remembering that during Dilma’s government, the company was sued in American courts, and in the end reached an agreement that cost it billions of Reais and even prevented its executives from being imprisoned.
Of course, the governors are aware of this, but used the increase as a pretext; after all, a fatter treasury in an election year always helps to elect the “friendly group”.
And thus, we approach a record revenue collection, and whether federal or state, public services remain precarious, but electoral funds, salaries of the upper echelons of the public pyramid, including the judiciary and legislative, continue to be paid on time.

Seja o primeiro a reagir!