Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
0 comments 
Changes in Recipes for Chocolates, Cookies, Mayonnaise, and Even Cleaning Products Show That Companies Change Product Formulas Without Clearly Informing What Was Altered, Frustrating Consumers and Raising Doubts About Transparency
Have you ever noticed that the flavor, smell, or texture of a product you’ve been buying for years seems different? That’s right. A series of recent cases shows that companies change product formulas without clearly communicating what has been altered. The practice is legal when it follows Anvisa’s rules, but in real life, the notification does not always reach the consumer as it should.
In many cases, it is the buyers themselves who notice the difference, perceiving the chocolate as less creamy, the mayonnaise as having a changed taste, or the fabric softener as having a weakened fragrance. The feeling of deception and loss of quality has generated complaints and even spontaneous campaigns on social media, where consumers report the frustration of discovering changes only after purchase.
Anvisa Rules Require Visible Notice About New Formula
According to the regulations of the National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa), when companies change product formulas, they must make this clear on the packaging.
-
Petrobras signed a contract worth R$ 11 billion with the Norwegian company DOF to build four subsea support vessels at the Navship shipyard in Navegantes. The vessels will have hybrid propulsion with batteries and electric motors, and the project is expected to generate 7,000 direct and indirect jobs in Santa Catarina.
-
Small city in Rio Grande do Sul receives Havan megastore with 11,000 m², four cinemas, and a food court, in a unit that will be the 192nd of the chain and reinforces the expansion plan for all Brazilian states.
-
Government wants to end wooden bridges: plan aims to replace 700 federal structures using artificial intelligence, sensors, and satellite images after tragedies, risk of collapse, and city isolation; DNIT will have only 45 days to act
-
New world power is a country often overlooked by most, but it has 4.5 trillion m³ of natural gas, controls 90% of exports with oil, and has already replaced part of the Russian supply to Europe.
The notice must contain expressions such as “new recipe”, “new formula”, or “new composition”, be in uppercase letters, and contrast with the packaging background.
Furthermore, this information must remain visible for at least 90 days to ensure that the consumer notices the change.
Even so, the text does not need to detail what has been modified, only indicate that something has changed.
Details must be accessible through digital means like website, chat, WhatsApp, or QR Code, directing the customer to more complete information.
Investigation Reveals That Transparency Is Still an Exception
A recent report tested the clarity of this information in well-known brands.
For a week, the reporter contacted companies like Coca-Cola, Sadia, Italac, Colgate, and Lacta to understand what had changed in their products.
The result was disappointing: most did not respond or did not explain which ingredients had been altered.
Italac, for example, denied changes in its cocoa powder, despite the notice of new formula on the packaging.
In another case, the traditional Tortinhas cookie displays the word “original,” but discreetly brings a notice of new composition.
The deodorant Rexona Bamboo and the Maguary apple juice use QR Codes so hidden that the consumer hardly finds them without help.
Not Every Change Is Negative, but Lack of Notice Creates Distrust
Experts explain that not all changes signify a decrease in quality.
Sometimes, companies change product formulas to comply with new health regulations, adjust colorings and preservatives, change flavors, extend shelf life, or adjust production costs.
There are even cases where the product improves in stability or texture.
The problem lies in the lack of transparency.
When brands do not clearly inform the reason and nature of the change, consumers feel deceived and lose trust.
The loyalty relationship between customer and brand depends on clarity in communication, especially in products of regular use and habitual flavor.
Consumers Demand More Clarity and Promise to Boycott Brands That Hide Changes
On social media, it is increasingly common to see reports from people who noticed differences in everyday products and felt they were “deceived.”
Many state that they no longer buy certain brands precisely due to the lack of explanation. The topic has become a symbol of a trust crisis between companies and the public.
While some companies are already reviewing their labels to comply with transparency requirements, others continue to ignore the notice or hide the warning in discreet locations on the packaging.
For the consumer, the message is clear: trust is built on details and lost with a trick.
Have you noticed that a product you always bought changed in taste, smell, or texture? Share in the comments what disappointed you the most.
Be the first to react!