Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
0 comments 
Although We Have Lived Decades Without a Direct Nuclear Confrontation, the World Remains on the Brink of Abyss — Sustained by a Dangerous Logic That Makes Destruction a Promise of Stability.
Since the explosion of the first nuclear bombs in 1945, the world has never been the same. The end of World War II did not bring only the defeat of the Axis, but inaugurated the era of armed peace, a concept where peace between nations is not the result of diplomacy, but of mutual fear of annihilation.
This logic, which strengthened throughout the Cold War, gave rise to what is called nuclear deterrence — a strategy based on the certainty that any attack with nuclear weapons will be met with equal or greater force, leading to mutually assured destruction.
This doctrine, nicknamed MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction), turned the planet into a gigantic macabre chessboard. Countries like the United States and Russia maintain nuclear arsenals on high alert, with armed submarines hidden in the oceans, missiles on constant alert, and automated systems ready to respond to any provocation. The objective is not to win a war, but to ensure that no one dares to start one.
-
Four Turkish students use ultrafiltration tubes, charcoal, and washing machines to create a device that reuses up to 90% of laundry water and wins a global prize of $100,000.
-
In Brazil, students from IFRN create a mini-plant that crushes construction debris, transforms construction waste into cement blocks, and wins an international prize from Samsung with a sustainable solution in the interior of Rio Grande do Norte.
-
Scientists mixed hydrocarbons with a gold leaf, subjected them to pressure greater than that of the Earth’s mantle and heat above 1,900 °C, and ended up accidentally discovering a new compound of gold and hydrogen.
-
Scientists discover a giant crocodile that lived millions of years ago, measuring over 8 meters, which reigned in the rivers of ancient Kenya and could hunt early humans near the water.
As contradictory as it may seem, this game of threats worked during the Cold War. No superpower fired first, precisely because it knew there would not be a second shot. However, the effectiveness of nuclear deterrence depends on an unstable ingredient: the confidence that the other side will act rationally even under extreme pressure.
And this confidence is increasingly fragile in a world marked by regional tensions, unpredictable leaders, and technological advancements that reduce response time from minutes to seconds.
Moreover, the strategy of peace through fear assumes that systems will never fail. But there have been documented cases of near-nuclear accidents caused by technical errors, misinterpretations of radar, or human failures. In a scenario of military escalation, a single missile interpreted as a real attack can be the spark for a total war, calling into question the entire logic of deterrence.
Another aspect ignored in the debate about nuclear security is the lack of preparation for the post-war. Governments invest trillions in maintaining and modernizing their arsenals, but little is discussed about how to save the survivors of an attack.
Infrastructure, medical services, food chains — everything would be destroyed in a matter of minutes. What would remain is a world in collapse, where survival would depend more on luck than on strategy.
Today, nine countries possess nuclear weapons and at least five are involved in active military tensions. Despite apparent global stability, we live in a balance built on quicksand. The generation that will inherit the command of these weapons has grown distant from the terror that marked the 50s to 80s. And perhaps for that reason, it underestimates the risk. Armed peace, after all, may not be peace — just the silent truce of those living with their finger on the trigger.
-
-
3 people reacted to this.