Project Proposes Lower Minimum Age and Full Benefit for Professionals Exposed to Daily Risks
The Complementary Bill 42/2023 is rapidly progressing in the Chamber of Deputies and promises to significantly change the rules of Social Security in Brazil.
Authored by Deputy Alberto Fraga (PL-DF), the text lowers the minimum retirement age and guarantees full payment for categories that work in unhealthy and dangerous environments.
Last Wednesday (27), the proposal was approved by the Committee on Social Security, Social Assistance, Childhood, Adolescence, and Family.
-
Worker used company excavator to save colleagues trapped during flood in RS, was fired for just cause, but the Court reversed the punishment and ordered the company to pay R$ 20 thousand for moral damages.
-
INSS maximum retirement in 2026 pays R$ 8,475 per month, but only 2.1 million Brazilians out of 40 million manage to reach this amount…
-
For the first time in history, millions of Brazilians will receive the 13th salary of 2026 without any Income Tax deductions — and the amount can arrive in full in their accounts.
-
Millions of Brazilians will have to work more in 2026: the score to retire has risen to 93 and 103, the minimum age has increased, and those who planned to retire this year may be in for a surprise.
The rapporteur, Deputy Geovania de Sá (PSDB-SC), defined that the minimum ages may drop to 40, 45, and 48 years, depending on the role.
Currently, the calculation guarantees only 60% of the average contribution, with increases of 2% for each additional year of contribution. The change will allow these professionals to receive 100% of the benefit.
Mining, Security, and Electricians: See Who Can Retire Earlier with 100% of the Benefit
The text covers professions that face elevated risks every day, including:
- Exposure to hazardous agents defined in Executive regulations;
- Underground mining;
- Exposure to asbestos;
- Metallurgy involving harmful chemical agents;
- High-power electrical systems, such as generators and transmission lines;
- Security activities, with or without firearms.
Deputy Geovania de Sá emphasized the importance of the measure:
“It is a fair issue that corrects this distortion after the constitutional amendment of the Social Security Reform. It will certainly value workers who put their health at risk every day. No matter how modern and adequate the equipment and PPE are, it is not feasible for someone to go down a coal mine after their 50s, for example.”
Even with modern PPE and technologies, unhealthy conditions remain a reality for thousands of professionals.
The Path to Final Voting Promises Confrontation Between Workers’ Defense and Impact on Public Accounts
Despite the initial approval, the proposal still needs to progress through other important stages.
The project will be analyzed by the Committee on Finance and Taxation (CFT) and then by the Committee on Constitution and Justice (CCJ).
Only after these phases can it be voted on the floor.
The debate is expected to be intense: on one side, the need to protect workers who risk their health; on the other, the challenge of maintaining the financial balance of Social Security.
If approved, the project will represent more than a technical adjustment. It will be a gesture of valuation and social recognition for essential, yet often invisible, categories.
Do you think that full retirement at 40 years is a fair achievement for those who risk their lives every day or could generate negative impact on Social Security?

Be the first to react!