Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
4 min of reading 
17 comments 
New Rule of September 8 Creates Exemptions for Products Without Domestic Supply, but the Legal Dispute Over Tariff Powers Goes to Trial on November 5 in the Supreme Court. Impacts Affect Farmers, Food Industry, and Retail.
The combination of reciprocal tariffs and retaliations from trading partners has created a cost and uncertainty environment for the entire food chain in the United States. On September 8, an Executive Order adjusted the list of exempt products, covering items that cannot be grown, mined, or produced in the country in sufficient volume. The measure alleviates pressures on some inputs but does not resolve the underlying instability.
The legal dispute gained a new chapter when, on August 29, 2025, the Federal Circuit Court ruled 7 to 4 that much of the global tariffs from the Trump administration are illegal. The case was taken to the Supreme Court, which scheduled November 5 to hear arguments, keeping businesses, farms, and supermarkets in a state of suspense.
On one side, the White House is trying to calibrate specific reliefs. On the other, Canada and China announced retaliatory tariffs affecting food and agricultural inputs, directly impacting consumer prices and company margins.
-
More than 40 million Brazilians are sinking into credit card debt, and indebtedness now affects 80.4% of Brazilian families.
-
Labor shortage becomes a new shock in Brazil’s jobs market and salaries soar in the services sector.
-
From seasoning to mayonnaise, a new giant worth $66 billion is born, expanding its presence in Latin America and Asia, attracting consumers who cook at home and want to spend less.
-
The company with 2 employees, founded with $20,000 in 2024, now generates nearly $2 billion in sales with the help of AI.
What Changed on September 8
The new order updated Annex II of reciprocal tariffs to broaden exemptions for strategic items, such as critical minerals and some pharmaceutical inputs, in addition to signaling exclusions for products impossible to supply domestically. The logic is to preserve essential supply chains without stimulating bottlenecks.
Industries and food sectors relying on imported inputs gain partial relief. Trade and logistics entities detail that changes came into effect at 12:01 AM on September 8, affecting warehouse entries and removals from that time onwards.
Analysts note, however, that there was also a removal of exemptions for other tariff codes, bringing some products back under the umbrella of tariffs. In other words, selective reliefs coexist with new pressure points within the same rule.
The Legal Battle and the Calendar of Uncertainty
The 7 to 4 decision in the Federal Circuit raised alarms about the legal limits for broad tariffs under the IEEPA. The government argues that overturning the measures harms sensitive negotiations, while the plaintiffs claim severe economic damages. The Supreme Court included the topic in its calendar and will hear the case on November 5.
Until then, businesses operate with scenario planning. Many contracts and price adjustments are conditional on the outcome or new executive orders. In perishable markets, weeks make a difference in final cost and availability.
For the food retail sector, legal uncertainty adds risk to the mix of private labels and regional suppliers, a strategy used to dilute price shocks. Buyers negotiate timelines and stocks to avoid losing assortment in sensitive categories.
Agriculture in the Crossfire, Inputs and Retaliations
American agriculture heavily depends on imported fertilizers. In the case of potash, about 79 to 80% of imports come from Canada, a link that becomes more expensive and uncertain in an environment of tariffs and retaliations. Higher costs in this area pressure margins in grain planting.
On the external front, China announced tariffs of 10% to 15% on US agricultural products, and Canada targeted 25% on over US$ 20 billion in American imports. For producers reliant on exports, this affects price, volume, and destination of sales.
The situation arises at a time of agricultural trade deficit and record food imports. In 2024, agricultural imports reached US$ 213 billion, driven by high-value items such as fruits, vegetables, and beverages. Greater external dependence amplifies the transmission of tariff shocks to consumers.
Impact of Tariffs on Restaurants and Food Industry
Typical restaurants operate with margins of 3% to 5%, a narrow buffer to absorb jumps in ingredient costs. The sector association has been reporting input pressures and limited transfers, leading some chains to reduce portions or adjust menus.
On the manufacturers’ side, multinationals like PepsiCo and Nestlé indicate caution with volatility and consumer sensitivity after years of adjustments. Signs of portfolio reshaping and focus on essential products emerge as a response to the tariff environment and more elastic demand.
In supermarkets, some key prices remain high. In August 2025, ground beef averaged US$ 6.32/lb in American cities, indicating that food inflation still weighs on wallets and complicates price formation for food service.
Impact on Consumers and Food Retail
The exemption for items without domestic production reduces the risk of shortages in categories like spices, cocoa, and coffee, but the re-establishment of supply chains depends on bilateral negotiations and adjustment time. Stores should strengthen private labels and prioritize regional sourcing wherever possible.
With the Supreme Court’s calendar and the possibility of new changes to the list of exemptions, retailers tend to shorten contracts, protect critical stocks, and redesign planograms to reduce exposure to more volatile items. Coordination with local suppliers gains importance.
For consumers, the effect goes beyond price: there may be a temporary decrease in variety and substitutions in processed products that depend on imported ingredients. In contrast, successful chains may use the moment to simplify assortment and highlight domestic products.
Do you think tariffs should protect American industry even with price increases and retaliations from partners, or do the costs to consumers and agriculture not outweigh the benefits? Leave your comment.
A nova Coreia do Norte não iniciou colapsando e em decadência..
Os americanos apenas estão a colher o que semearam ao votarem no seu maior inimigo, o MAGA. Ele vai destruir a economia americana e se puder a de todo o mundo.
Trump é um louco ou um genio? A historia vai mostrar, mas na minha sincera opnião esta muito mais para um louco e vai encolher a economia americana e o poder aquisitivo dos americanos com aumento de inflação e rescesssao economica