Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
0 comments 
In A Controversial Episode, The Pentagon Chief Was Caught Sharing Military Plans In A Chat Group. The Case Gained Even More Repercussion After An Earlier Statement Of His Came To Light, Claiming That Those Who Commit This Type Of Leak Should Be Fired.
A group of national security advisers from the United States, including the Pentagon chief, was caught discussing military plans confidential in a chat group on Signal, a common messaging app.
The revelation shocked many due to the involvement of high-ranking officials and exposed a direct contradiction from the current Defense Secretary, Pete Hegseth.
Hegseth Criticized What He Now Did
Before taking office, Hegseth was one of the harshest critics of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for using a private email server for official matters.
-
Armed ships, uncrewed and operating in dangerous locations: how the US ghost ship fleet transforms commercial vessels into autonomous machines of up to 2,000 tons for dangerous missions without putting crews on the front line.
-
Canada’s richest province challenges the federal government, advances with a separatist movement, and could hold a historic vote for independence.
-
United States intercepts six Iranian vessels in the Strait of Hormuz and April ceasefire is once again threatened
-
A rare earths mine in Goiás, sold to the US for US$ 2.8 billion, never belonged to Brazil, but has now become a central piece in the global dispute between mineral sovereignty, geopolitical influence, strategic industry, and the global race for critical minerals dominated by China.
In statements aired by Fox News, he claimed that “people went to jail for 1 percent of what Hillary Clinton did” and that she was “a corrupt politician.”
These statements occurred around 2016, when the chant “lock her up!” became popular at Donald Trump’s campaign events.
Hegseth, then a frequent commentator on conservative channels, reinforced the idea that Clinton’s actions were a serious violation. In 2017, he stated that she “reinforced that narrative through her reckless actions.”
However, years later, Hegseth himself was included in a group where high officials discussed potential attacks on Yemen using an unencrypted app and outside authorized channels.
One of the participants mistakenly added to the group was Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, who revealed the content of the conversation.
Experts See Legal Risks Of Revealing Military Plans
According to experts consulted by The Atlantic, those involved might try to justify the conversation by claiming that the military attack plans were declassified.
But the explanation, according to legal scholars, does not hold up, as the matters were dealt with in an environment lacking official protection — and in front of a journalist, which could constitute a leak.
The use of commercial apps to handle national security information is considered highly inappropriate. In many cases, it may violate the Espionage Act, legislation that deals with the handling of state secrets.
Nevertheless, none of those involved in the group seem to have raised concerns at the time of the conversations. This included National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, who created the group, and other high-ranking members.
Criticisms And Ironies
Waltz, by the way, has also harshly criticized Hillary Clinton for her use of private emails. In 2023, he claimed on X (formerly Twitter) that Jake Sullivan, current national security adviser for the Biden administration, had sent sensitive messages to Clinton’s account. “And what did the DOJ do about it? Nothing,” he wrote.
The statement was considered incorrect. Clinton was investigated by the FBI and, days before the 2016 election, the then director of the agency, James Comey, announced the reopening of the case, which many see as a decisive factor for her defeat.
In light of the new controversy involving the Signal group, Clinton reacted briefly and directly. On her official account, she posted: “You must be kidding me.”
Will There Be Punishment?
The situation exposes a direct contradiction between rhetoric and practice. Hegseth, who previously called for exemplary punishment for digital misconduct, now appears involved in a similar — and possibly more serious — practice.
So far, there are no signs that those involved will be held accountable. But the public exposure of the case raises questions about double standards and unequal treatment depending on the political context.
Be the first to react!