Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
0 comments 
American Producers Advocate for Total Suspension of Imports, While Importers Warn of Risk to Hamburger Supply
A new trade tension between Brazil and the United States gained strength in August 2024. This is because the increase in import tariffs on Brazilian beef raised the charge from 26.4% to 76.4%. The measure was applied after an additional tax of 50 percentage points was imposed by the U.S. government.
Association Pushes for Stricter Measures
The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA), which represents U.S. cattle ranchers, believes that the tariffs are still insufficient to curb the flow of beef from Brazil. Kent Bacus, the organization’s director, sent a letter on September 3, 2024, to the United States Trade Representative (USTR), linked to the White House. In it, he reinforced that only a total suspension of imports could be effective.
Moreover, Bacus argued that the favorable exchange rate for Brazil and lower production costs allow the country to absorb the tariffs and continue exporting. Therefore, even with higher taxes, Brazilian beef remains competitive. He also highlighted that the new rates end up discouraging imports from traditional partners like Ireland, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
-
The labor shortage has changed its face in Brazil: companies hire 80% more, but workers stay only 6.8 months in the job, the service market becomes a “revolving door,” and businesses spend increasingly more to train teams that soon leave.
-
Chinese giant chooses SC to set up its first factory in Brazil, investing R$ 250 million and producing MRI machines costing R$ 10 million each, with 100 direct jobs and 5% of revenue allocated to research.
-
After selling a unit for R$ 115 million to pay off debts, a traditional factory in SC founded in 1932 has a new R$ 64.8 million plan denied by the court and retains about 690 workers in Joinville.
-
Use of slimming pens skyrockets in Brazil, surpasses the global average, and causes unexpected changes in consumption habits, diet, beauty, and the wellness market.
Sanitary Debate and Consumer Confidence
For Bacus, however, the tariffs do not address sanitary concerns. The NCBA accuses Brazil of not meeting international food safety and animal health standards. In addition, the organization claims that Brazil complicates access for American beef to the Brazilian market.
For this reason, he stated that the worry is not losing market share to Brazil. In reality, the concern lies in the possibility that failures in sanitary controls might compromise American consumers’ confidence in beef.
Thus, at the USTR hearing scheduled for September 3, 2024, the NCBA officially requested the suspension of Brazilian imports until sanitary equivalences are proven.
Brazilian Exports at Risk
In Brazil, however, the reaction was immediate. The Brazilian Association of Exporting Industries of Meat (Abiec) estimates that the measure could lead to billion-dollar losses. According to Roberto Perosa, the entity’s president, in an interview with the magazine Exame in August 2024, the tariff makes exportation unfeasible. He estimated that the loss could reach US$ 1 billion per year.
Therefore, even with cost advantages, Brazilian competitiveness ends up being threatened by increasingly stringent trade barriers. In addition, the impacts affect not only exporters but also the national production chain.
Hamburger Meat Depends on Brazil
Not all American sectors, however, support the restrictions. The Meat Import Council of America (Mica), which represents importers, defended in a letter sent in August 2024 the importance of Brazilian meat for the domestic market.
Michael Skahill, Mica’s director, stated that the U.S. has a structural deficit in the production of lean beef trim. This input is essential for producing ground beef and hamburgers. Since the American herd is focused on prime cuts, there is not enough supply.
Therefore, without Brazilian supply, the American industry would struggle to meet domestic demand.
Hamburger Consumption at Risk
Mica reminded that Brazilian trimmings are fundamental for mixing with local production, which is rich in fat. This combination ensures the adequate supply of ground beef. According to the entity, the United States consumes about 50 billion hamburgers per year.
Thus, restrictions on Brazilian imports would jeopardize national supply. Furthermore, the council warned that a potential suspension would result in higher prices. This situation would harm consumers, pressure the food industry, and could affect thousands of jobs.
Therefore, the trade dispute exposes contrasting interests: on one side, American ranchers advocate for the total suspension of Brazilian imports. They claim unfair competition and sanitary failures. On the other side, importers request the maintenance of imports to ensure supply and control prices of ground beef and hamburgers.
Now, in light of this dispute, the final decision of the American government will be crucial in determining the next steps. What do you think should prevail: the protection of American ranchers or the guarantee of accessible meat supply for consumers?
Be the first to react!