Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
4 min of reading 
0 comments 
Lula’s Government Is About to Make Deep Changes to the Health and Education Floors. With Budget Cuts, Controversial Measures May Directly Affect Access and Quality of These Fundamental Services.
The measure may change the way the federal government handles essential spending, impacting vital areas like Health and Education.
Experts warn of the risks of this restructuring, which could affect millions of Brazilians.
The proposed change, which is still under debate, aims to control the increase in expenses drastically, restricting one of the largest budgets in the country.
-
For the economist José Kobori, the USA gained a trump card to “blackmail” Brazil and undermine China’s influence by classifying the PCC and Comando Vermelho as terrorists, increasing the power to pressure companies, banks, and even Pix.
-
The labor shortage has changed its face in Brazil: companies hire 80% more, but workers stay only 6.8 months in the job, the service market becomes a “revolving door,” and businesses spend increasingly more to train teams that soon leave.
-
Chinese giant chooses SC to set up its first factory in Brazil, investing R$ 250 million and producing MRI machines costing R$ 10 million each, with 100 direct jobs and 5% of revenue allocated to research.
-
After selling a unit for R$ 115 million to pay off debts, a traditional factory in SC founded in 1932 has a new R$ 64.8 million plan denied by the court and retains about 690 workers in Joinville.
The federal government is discussing significant changes to how the health and education floors are calculated.
The proposal being analyzed by the Ministry of Finance, led by Fernando Haddad, suggests that the health and education floors stop being linked to revenue and become tied to the spending limits of the fiscal framework.
If approved, the change will limit spending growth in the health and education areas to 2.5% above inflation, as stipulated by the new fiscal rules.
This revision could have serious repercussions.
The government intends to cut costs while simultaneously preserving essential resources, such as those allocated to health and education, sectors fundamental to the well-being of the population.
In a meeting at the Palácio do Planalto, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva discussed the measure with Health Minister Nisia Trindade and Education Minister Camilo Santana.
The proposed measure aims to ensure fiscal sustainability, but according to the president’s own advisors, this change could generate significant strain with allies and even within the Workers’ Party (PT) itself, complicating the implementation of the change.
Impact on the Federal Budget
According to the Constitution, spending on Health and Education must represent, respectively, 15% and 18% of the federal government’s net revenue.
However, the new fiscal framework model has imposed stricter limits on government spending, making this link between revenue and spending a challenge.
The measure to unlink the health and education floors from the net current revenue and place them under the fiscal ceiling may pose a risk of reducing investments in these areas.
Furthermore, if the measure is confirmed, spending on health and education may not grow more than 2.5% above inflation, a margin considered low given the increasing investment needs in infrastructure, salaries, and resources for both sectors.
The restriction may compromise the quality of services provided to the population, especially at a time of economic recovery post-pandemic.
Political Reaction and Challenges for the Government
The Ministry of Finance’s proposal has generated controversy, especially in the political landscape.
PT President Gleisi Hoffmann has already spoken out against the proposal, stating that unlinking the floors from revenue would not be a fair option and could harm essential areas like Health and Education.
For the PT, the measure represents a setback and a way to pursue fiscal solutions that harm the most vulnerable population.
This division within the government and among its political allies calls into question support for the proposed change. The debate remains heated, and the evaluation of the measure’s impact will continue to be discussed in the coming weeks.
Alternatives Under Discussion
One alternative being discussed by the economic team is to include parliamentary amendments within the health and education floors, a measure that can help mitigate the impact of budget limitations.
However, this change must also be formalized through a Proposed Amendment to the Constitution (PEC), which requires a long legislative process in Congress.
The government has not yet announced an official date for the changes, but according to information from the Ministry of Finance, discussions are in the final stretch, and details should be presented soon.
Within the Planalto, there is an expectation that the country’s fiscal situation will improve, especially with the recent drop in the dollar value and future interest rates.
However, these changes may not be enough to convince critics of the proposal.
The Future of the Continuous Payment Benefit (BPC)
Another sensitive issue in the discussions of budget cuts is the Continuous Payment Benefit (BPC), which has seen a considerable increase in recent months.
The government is seeking ways to reformulate access and maintenance for people in the program, trying to block improper payments and adjust the rules to ensure that resources are directed to those who truly need them.
However, one crucial measure has already been ruled out: unlinking the BPC from the minimum wage, a proposal that would generate even more controversy and negative repercussions.
How will the federal government handle the future of Health, Education, and social programs in Brazil? Stay tuned for upcoming updates to see how these measures may impact your pocket and the quality of essential services.
Be the first to react!