Portuguese 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
0 comments 
Discover The Impacts Of War In Sudan, The International Intervention, And The Fight For Survival Of The Sudanese People!
On April 15, 2025, Sudan marks two years mired in one of the most brutal and neglected wars of our time. With over 61,000 dead just between Darfur and Khartoum, the armed conflict is not just a local dispute: it is a strategic war financed by external powers, especially the United Arab Emirates (UAE), who act behind the scenes as promoters and beneficiaries of a humanitarian crisis of catastrophic proportions.
The war in Sudan, fueled by geopolitical and economic interests, has become a symbol of a silent genocide in the face of international complicity.
The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) advanced on Khartoum, retaking the presidential palace and strategic points in the Sudanese capital. But behind the direct confrontation between military factions, a network of external support keeps this war alive.
-
Israel finds Hezbollah militarized tunnel over 200 meters long under village, with 4 missile launch shafts, 12 chambers, anti-tank missiles, drones, and weapons depots at a depth of 25 meters.
-
Ukraine launches largest drone attack on Moscow since 2022, Russia claims to have intercepted nearly 200 aircraft near the capital, Kapotnya refinery targeted again, and offensive reignites alert about war reaching the Russian energy heart just a few kilometers from the Kremlin.
-
Truck drivers, freight, and fines from 2022 take center stage in politics: Chamber approves MP with amnesty, mandatory tracking by CIOT, million-dollar penalties, and new minimum wage for those who spend more than 24 hours on the road.
-
China off the radar: US plans mega $30 million weapons depot in Australia, out of reach of most Chinese missiles, with full capacity expected by 2028
The Sudanese government formally denounced the United Arab Emirates at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), accusing them of complicity in the genocide of the Masalit people, an indigenous ethnicity from the Darfur region.
The accusation is based on the alleged delivery of weapons and financing to RSF militias, who would be using hunger, rape, and mass executions as instruments of domination. According to the Sudan Research Group at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, by November 2024, over 61,000 people lost their lives. Since then, the situation has only worsened.
The deaths occur both in direct confrontations and as a consequence of preventable diseases, food shortages, and forced displacements.
Sudan has become a symbol of modern war fueled by imperialist interests, where human suffering is a bargaining chip for geopolitical influence. The UAE, seeking to establish itself as a regional power in Africa, utilizes Sudanese territory as a strategic point.
With vast reserves of gold, diamonds, fertile land, and access to the Red Sea, Sudan becomes a key piece for Abu Dhabi’s expansionist plans. This movement follows the same logic as U.S. military alliances with Israel in the Middle East, where Gulf monarchies operate as intermediaries for Western interests.
The UAE’s involvement in the Yemen war, alongside Saudi Arabia, had already highlighted this stance: over 150,000 dead in a decade, according to official estimates. A UN report in 2021 warned that this number could exceed 1.3 million by 2030 if conflicts continue.
The tactic is similar: economic blockade, systematic attacks, and the use of food as a weapon of war. In Sudan, this strategy is replicated with the approval of foreign capital.
Selective Silence And Global Complicity
While Gaza receives timid and politically shaped coverage, Sudan is barely mentioned in the highlights of international diplomacy.
In 2024, during a special UN session dedicated to genocide victims, there was no mention of the Sudanese humanitarian crisis.
This absence of recognition reveals the pattern of selectivity in international condemnations, which rarely confront the interests of major powers or their wealthy allies.
The war in Sudan, much like the massacre in Gaza, is being conducted with the complacency of international institutions, which avoid confronting the countries involved in the name of trade alliances, defense agreements, and strategic investments.
War As An Instrument Of Looting
The presence of the United Arab Emirates in the Sudanese landscape is part of a long-standing strategy. Companies linked to the monarchy exploit gold mines in the country and maintain contracts with mercenaries and local militias.
The war thus transforms into a highly lucrative business model, under the guise of regional stabilization.
Meanwhile, millions of Sudanese face hunger, displacement, and the total loss of their homes and families.
International organizations, major Western powers, and multinational corporations share responsibility for the catastrophe by ignoring warnings about the worsening situation.
The war in Sudan is not just an armed clash — it is a looting operation conducted with geopolitical precision.
Be the first to react!