Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
2 min of reading 
0 comments 
A recent labor court decision has caused controversy in the delivery sector. The company Rappi was forced to hire all its deliverers under CLT (Consolidation of Labor Laws), under penalty of a fine of R$ 1,000 per worker who does not have the contract properly regularized.
This measure is part of a continuous chapter in the labor court’s struggle to maintain its relevance. The Supreme Federal Court (STF) has already established that this type of hiring is legitimate, questioning the decision of the São Paulo court.
Why Is CLT Under Discussion?
The issue goes beyond Rappi’s case. Worldwide, the CLT model is losing ground. Many argue that this happens because it is bad for workers, making the labor court increasingly irrelevant. In other words, if no one wants to hire under CLT anymore, what is the purpose of this entity?
The action was filed by the Public Prosecutor’s Office of Labor in São Paulo, which alleges irregularities in the hiring of Rappi’s deliverers. According to the agency, even though it is app-based work, it should be governed by CLT.
-
More than 3,900 Brazilian municipalities are unable to pay their own bills, and yet two city halls located just 700 meters apart continue to operate separately, each with a full structure.
-
Lula joins Mexico and Spain to defend Cuba after Trump threatens the island and says that the world cannot sleep and wake up every day with a president of the Republic threatening to go to war.
-
The report shows that the center of the global economy is shifting to the South, with BRICS and emerging markets growing above the global average while Europe barely reaches 1% and the United States spends trillions on wars.
-
BRICS countries lead the world ranking in hours worked, with India, China, Russia, and Brazil at the top of the list, while Germans work nearly a thousand hours less per year and earn much more.
What Does CLT Say?
Article 3 of the CLT defines what an employee is, considering four criteria: personal nature, non-temporary nature, subordination, and payment. In the case of Rappi, the last two criteria are the subject of intense discussion. While some argue that the relationship is temporary and without direct subordination, others claim otherwise.
The Supreme Court already has an established understanding on the matter, which puts pressure on regional courts that rule differently. The expectation is that if the issue reaches the STF, the decision of the São Paulo court will be overturned.
The Human Side of the Story
Finally, it is worth noting that many workers rely on delivery apps as an essential source of income, especially in times of high unemployment. Therefore, the labor court’s decision affects not only companies but also the lives of thousands of people who depend on this type of work to survive.
Seja o primeiro a reagir!