Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
2 min of reading 
0 comments 
A recent labor court decision has caused controversy in the delivery sector. The company Rappi was forced to hire all its deliverers under CLT (Consolidation of Labor Laws), under penalty of a fine of R$ 1,000 per worker who does not have the contract properly regularized.
This measure is part of a continuous chapter in the labor court’s struggle to maintain its relevance. The Supreme Federal Court (STF) has already established that this type of hiring is legitimate, questioning the decision of the São Paulo court.
Why Is CLT Under Discussion?
The issue goes beyond Rappi’s case. Worldwide, the CLT model is losing ground. Many argue that this happens because it is bad for workers, making the labor court increasingly irrelevant. In other words, if no one wants to hire under CLT anymore, what is the purpose of this entity?
The action was filed by the Public Prosecutor’s Office of Labor in São Paulo, which alleges irregularities in the hiring of Rappi’s deliverers. According to the agency, even though it is app-based work, it should be governed by CLT.
-
Gasoline prices surge in the US, pushing families to credit cards as squeezed incomes turn “buy now, pay later” into an emergency option.
-
US$38.9 trillion debt: Elon Musk supports Warren Buffett’s radical plan that promises to end the US deficit in 5 minutes
-
Tight budget in Brazil: see practical strategies to get out of financial distress, avoid debt, and regain control of your life even with high inflation and compromised income
-
The IMF shows Brazil’s reality in the coming years and projects the country back into the top 10 largest economies in the world by 2030, with a GDP of US$ 3.20 trillion and a jump of US$ 560 billion in five years.
What Does CLT Say?
Article 3 of the CLT defines what an employee is, considering four criteria: personal nature, non-temporary nature, subordination, and payment. In the case of Rappi, the last two criteria are the subject of intense discussion. While some argue that the relationship is temporary and without direct subordination, others claim otherwise.
The Supreme Court already has an established understanding on the matter, which puts pressure on regional courts that rule differently. The expectation is that if the issue reaches the STF, the decision of the São Paulo court will be overturned.
The Human Side of the Story
Finally, it is worth noting that many workers rely on delivery apps as an essential source of income, especially in times of high unemployment. Therefore, the labor court’s decision affects not only companies but also the lives of thousands of people who depend on this type of work to survive.
Be the first to react!