A recent labor court decision has caused controversy in the delivery sector. The company Rappi was forced to hire all its deliverers under CLT (Consolidation of Labor Laws), under penalty of a fine of R$ 1,000 per worker who does not have the contract properly regularized.
This measure is part of a continuous chapter in the labor court’s struggle to maintain its relevance. The Supreme Federal Court (STF) has already established that this type of hiring is legitimate, questioning the decision of the São Paulo court.
Why Is CLT Under Discussion?
The issue goes beyond Rappi’s case. Worldwide, the CLT model is losing ground. Many argue that this happens because it is bad for workers, making the labor court increasingly irrelevant. In other words, if no one wants to hire under CLT anymore, what is the purpose of this entity?
The action was filed by the Public Prosecutor’s Office of Labor in São Paulo, which alleges irregularities in the hiring of Rappi’s deliverers. According to the agency, even though it is app-based work, it should be governed by CLT.
-
Petrobras and Engeko’s New Investment Plan Promises Billions and Thousands of Jobs, Capturing Market Attention
-
JBS Halts Beef Production for China as Brazil Exceeds 50% of 1.106 Million-Ton Quota; Tariff May Rise from 12% to 67%, Raising Concerns Over Cattle Prices.
-
Brazil’s Social Security Alters Biometric Rules for Pensions and Benefits, Sets 30-Day Deadline, Expands Requirements, and Clarifies Who Is Exempt from Immediate Update
-
Major Brazilian Supermarkets, Including Carrefour and Assaí, May Close Earlier to Prevent Price Increases
What Does CLT Say?
Article 3 of the CLT defines what an employee is, considering four criteria: personal nature, non-temporary nature, subordination, and payment. In the case of Rappi, the last two criteria are the subject of intense discussion. While some argue that the relationship is temporary and without direct subordination, others claim otherwise.
The Supreme Court already has an established understanding on the matter, which puts pressure on regional courts that rule differently. The expectation is that if the issue reaches the STF, the decision of the São Paulo court will be overturned.
The Human Side of the Story
Finally, it is worth noting that many workers rely on delivery apps as an essential source of income, especially in times of high unemployment. Therefore, the labor court’s decision affects not only companies but also the lives of thousands of people who depend on this type of work to survive.


Be the first to react!